[ANN][ICO] SmartValley – decentralized expert community for ICO projects - page 33.

tera1004

newbie

Activity: 54

Merit: 0

Quote from: Boristhecat on November 16, 2017, 03:22:41 AM

Quote from: blogerator on November 15, 2017, 07:51:51 AM

We are building a system for cumulative assessment of input from each particular expert:

it will be a combination of platform administrators votes, ICO team votes as well as votes of the colleague-experts. Artificial intelligence (AI) is going to contribute here as well. AI is to monitor dynamics of experts’ effectiveness, for example, adding scores for posting regularly or for posting a series of really hot words of advice, etc.

It means to get some valid data it will be necessary to wait for a certain period in order to understand how who is working. Is there a beta test of the system or will this be clarified in the process?

Will test this system in the PTA? I would like to start to participate in it

tera1004

newbie

Activity: 54

Merit: 0

How much interest will be allocated to facebook and twitter? Very interesting. I would like to take part in the bounty

parasite

member

Activity: 126

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

Where is your team from?

As far as i know, they have Russian roots, but company was registered and operates worldwide from Switzerland.

Sartrute

full member

Activity: 522

Merit: 101

Quote from: blogerator on November 14, 2017, 08:51:20 AM

Please don't discuss offtopic in our campaign thread. Thank you!

Hi!
Are you a community project manager? What time zone are you in? It is not very convenient to communicate with such delays in the answers.

blogerator

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: lichnikkk on November 15, 2017, 07:45:04 AM

Would you say you're a classic, stereotypical Millennial? Wink

Would you please keep any off-topic discussions out of this thread.

Thank you!

Boristhecat

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 629

Quote from: KTChampions on November 14, 2017, 10:56:46 AM

I hope you do not consider option as selling the project to a large investor? Do you have or will be provided the investment restrictions? As for example the Сindiсator had tiers for investors to prevent owning a large part of the project by one person.

Dont you think that selling to one or several large investors contradicts the stated tasks? In the priority is decentralization, and therefore participants must be a lot and they should be practically equal.

blogerator

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: Sartrute on November 15, 2017, 07:16:59 AM

Then the question about the rank is eliminated. By January I will already be full member.

Your forum rank is ok for bounty. You are welcomed to join us!

KTChampions

legendary

Activity: 2478

Merit: 1951

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: blogerator on November 14, 2017, 08:48:34 AM

Boris, all current agreements are of a private nature at this phase of the project. As soon as ICO starts our respected partners will be revealed to public.

I hope you do not consider option as selling the project to a large investor? Do you have or will be provided the investment restrictions? As for example the Сindiсator had tiers for investors to prevent owning a large part of the project by one person.

blogerator

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: ninjaskip on November 15, 2017, 06:59:03 AM

You say that expert's recommendations could lead to the potential receipt of shares in an ICO. But who judges whether a recommendation is a valuable contribution or not? And when it's decided that it is valuable, then how valuable is it? Is that up to the teams running the ICOs or is there another independent jury? How will that work out?

We are building a system for cumulative assessment of input from each particular expert:

it will be a combination of platform administrators votes, ICO team votes as well as votes of the colleague-experts. Artificial intelligence (AI) is going to contribute here as well. AI is to monitor dynamics of experts’ effectiveness, for example, adding scores for posting regularly or for posting a series of really hot words of advice, etc.

Boristhecat

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 629

Quote from: blogerator on November 14, 2017, 08:48:34 AM

Boris, all current agreements are of a private nature at this phase of the project. As soon as ICO starts our respected partners will be revealed to public.

Thanks for the answer, I will follow the news. I will perfectly present the difficulties of agreeing a partnership. Judging by the list of information partners, you will please us with something interesting and weighty.

lichnikkk

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: Boristhecat on November 15, 2017, 07:05:27 AM

I will wait for video bloggers - I do not like to study the WP carefully Cheesy

Would you say you're a classic, stereotypical Millennial? Wink

Sartrute

full member

Activity: 522

Merit: 101

Quote from: blogerator on November 14, 2017, 08:47:33 AM

Anyway, we’ll have a decision on our bounty program in first half of December. It will be announced in advance, please follow the updates on this thread.

It turns out that the ICO will be in the last days of December? Usually the bounty begins much earlier than ICO. It is interesting to me cause I would like to take part in the signature campaign.
Will it be open to the Members?

ninjaskip

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

You say that expert's recommendations could lead to the potential receipt of shares in an ICO. But who judges whether a recommendation is a valuable contribution or not? And when it's decided that it is valuable, then how valuable is it? Is that up to the teams running the ICOs or is there another independent jury? How will that work out?

blogerator

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: KTChampions on November 15, 2017, 06:44:36 AM

Quote from: Boristhecat on November 14, 2017, 02:19:28 PM

Dont you think that selling to one or several large investors contradicts the stated tasks? In the priority is decentralization, and therefore participants must be a lot and they should be practically equal.

No. It does not matter who owns the project. The main thing is that it had the necessary number of experts. According to WP they have a material interest. So they will be in the project.

+1

SmartValley - decentralized platform for developing blockchain projects and launching legal ICOs, which stands for open community of independent & freelance experts.

blogerator

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: tera1004 on November 14, 2017, 03:07:39 PM

Interesting project. I hope you can implement it

Thank you for interest! We hope we will get our goals and even more.

blogerator

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: Sartrute on November 14, 2017, 02:28:51 PM

Quote from: blogerator on November 14, 2017, 08:51:20 AM

Please don't discuss offtopic in our campaign thread. Thank you!

Hi!
Are you a community project manager? What time zone are you in? It is not very convenient to communicate with such delays in the answers.

Yes for first. And for second -

We are sorry for not being able to immediately answer all your questions due to a large amount of work and intensive development phase of our project. Towards pre-ICO and ICO we’ll better guide and inform the public to raise knowledge about the project.

blogerator

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: Boristhecat on November 14, 2017, 02:19:28 PM

Quote from: KTChampions on November 14, 2017, 10:56:46 AM

I hope you do not consider option as selling the project to a large investor? Do you have or will be provided the investment restrictions? As for example the Cindicator had tiers for investors to prevent owning a large part of the project by one person.

Dont you think that selling to one or several large investors contradicts the stated tasks? In the priority is decentralization, and therefore participants must be a lot and they should be practically equal.

See post below for similar question's answer.

KTChampions

legendary

Activity: 2478

Merit: 1951

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: blogerator on November 13, 2017, 09:26:33 AM

Yes, we'll have the bounty campaign in near future, but is not running just now. We'll announce the exact numbers of bounty tokens and terms of the campaign in the coming weeks.

Have you already decided how many percent of the bounty pool will be allocated to the signature campaign? I'm surprised that many projects now underestimate this type of advertising in favor of spam in social networks.

blogerator

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: KTChampions on November 14, 2017, 10:56:46 AM

Quote from: blogerator on November 14, 2017, 08:48:34 AM

Boris, all current agreements are of a private nature at this phase of the project. As soon as ICO starts our respected partners will be revealed to public.

I hope you do not consider option as selling the project to a large investor? Do you have or will be provided the investment restrictions? As for example the Cindicator had tiers for investors to prevent owning a large part of the project by one person.

We don’t have any limitations on the max size of investment or consolidations, for example there was invested over a million usd in a single transaction into one of the projects on our ICO platform (see here for details). Nevertheless, we do have a process for minor background check of all of our major investors + a simple KYC procedure for all the rest.

Sartrute

full member

Activity: 522

Merit: 101

Quote from: blogerator on November 13, 2017, 10:10:29 AM

Yes, we have. We update our WP after all important decisions or changes.

Nice to hear. Many projects do not follow their "integrity of information". And in one document, one thing is written in another document another info, that's why everyone needs to clarify in order to act for sure.

Topic: [ANN][ICO] SmartValley – decentralized expert community for ICO projects - page 33. (Read 10174 times)