Thank you I think! if English is not your native language I do speak others if its easier
Why isn't this ICO advertised in the Greek section of this forum ? You used to post there all the time.
well considering you have disabled the ability to search your threads in the last 5 mins in case I put more up its hard then. Your name has been linked to helping stevie777 extort money from BTCe exchange and for red trusting at random. The only reason you have DT is not that you earned it but because you were trusted for some reason by dooglas that gave you DT. Please don't take this to a personal level and try and hurt a company Don't hide behind an alias if you have a problem with me bring it to me in person, not via an entity I happen to freelance for.You name a time and place in the country your in (UK) and i will fly there no problem and we can sort it out face to face
There is no ability to disable thread searches and everything is indexed by google anyway. Important information is also available using archives and cache. Archives can be used to show changed or deleted content.
Making such claims is extremely suspect. You had me almost convinced earlier. Now I don't believe any of your claims. Your inability to use the forum functions (being Legendary) and (lack of) knowledge of forum protocols just astounds me.
Perhaps you are talking about this:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17648719Made by this user ?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=899157(Also unrelated (since there is no validity to the accusation) - Perhaps reading my article on Mt.Gox will give you some clues about BTCe. Hint: LOL @ scamming BTCe)
When people get busted for scams they make all sorts of ridiculous claims or set up alt accounts to make up claims. Of course they turn out to be extremely transparent. Apparently I'm a drug dealer because I wrote an article about silk road. Never mind the fact that my account is from 2016, I wasn't into crypto when silkroad was in existence and there are no verifiable facts offered. That is the difference between legitimate scam claims made and bogus scam claims made.
Legitimate claims include the offering of verifiable proof. Whether correct or incorrect a decent level of proof is offered accompanying the claim. This proof can then be checked and discussed by a variety of people. Others can use it to make an opinion.
Bogus claims either offer no proof, nonsense or strawmen to deflect accusations made towards themselves. If you utilize claims made by untrusted feedback then you really should verify the claims yourself - otherwise you are just repeating nonsense that is usually already proven to be false. Deliberately using false already disproven claims is something that scammers do all the time. It makes the person making the claims look like a scammer.
I can accept a noob making such a mistake but really would expect more form someone with a Legendary account.
Seeing how trustworthy someone is when they are asking for $20-30 million dollars is essential. Everyone involved with the project should expect to be scrutinized.
Their trustworthiness is a reflection on whether the project is to be trusted. Cryptodevil isn't offering an ICO. Yet his credibility and claims are far more transparent than yours.
Making provably bogus accusations against him won't help your case. He isn't advertising to get money. You are.
Lets see if I understand it so far:
You are advertising to get millions of dollars for tokens that the "investor" can use to pay for services on a platform that has 2500 subscribers.
The funds will be used to PAY to develop the platform but the investor doesn't get any OWNERSHIP in return.
So while the investors token funds are used to develop and market the platform the rewards are kept by the founders. The "investor" can use the tokens to pay for the services that it helped develop.
In the meantime a legendary account from someone suffering from cancer that has little understanding of the forum rules and doesn't know how to use some of the basic forum functions that is not getting paid to advertise the ICO and doing it completely voluntary out of the goodness of their heart is advertising the ICO.
The director of the company that owns the APP - Sanjay Sinha has nothing to do with the ICO.
Evil "cryptodevil" who is working for another competing ICO (no evidence given), who is blocking you from accessing forum functions (functions that cannot be blocked), who is scamming others (no evidence given) is asking horrible relevant questions. Anyone expressing a symilar viewpoint is automatically his sockpuppet alt account. (Hint to anyone planning to use this as "evidence of scamming by Cryptodevil" - I'm expressing sarcasm)
Instead we should listen to the clearly paid shills or bots that are posting such believable and creative nonsense that it either "spam bumping" the thread (breaking forum rules) or a creative attempt at a Haiku.
I suppose this business is very interesting and good.
Brilliant plan, absorbing business, cognitive activity.
Did I summarize it correctly ?
You name a time and place in the country your in (UK) and i will fly there no problem and we can sort it out face to face
Making aggressive statements like this also doesn't help. It is often used by scammers. How can anyone take something like that seriously ? You will fly anywhere in the world to meet someone who accuses the ICO which you are not getting paid for to advertise as a scam ? Wouldn't it be hard to get travel insurance with your condition ?
Bitcoin forum evolved from the Cypherpunks movement. Do you really think that early members are going to drop their OpSec and reveal their identity to someone they are accusing of being a scammer when they believe in anonymity, encryption and privacy ?
