Topic: ⚡⚡[ANN]⚡⚡[ICO]⚡⚡SYNTHESTECH - Synthesis of Precious Metals⚡⚡ - page 12. (Read 25466 times)

Basically, you have already answered your own question. ICO is the most advanced and modern way for financing projects, already chosen by dozens of top companies.
It provides us with the ability to do work for yourselves instead of selling what we achieved for no price. Tokens provide investors with an ability to exit project at any stage.
We believe that at the moment we have the most promising project in the world. As 60% will be spent on values like buildings and equipment, while only 40% will be spent on the research.
There is an opportunity to make thousands of percents benefit while risk is only 40.

If you can create gold artificially shouldn't that drop to a massive decrease in gold's price as the scarcity argument will be undermined?

It seems you haven't read our WP, since it is written there that our project has nothing to do with alchemy. We carry out research in nuclear physics.
The rest of your post makes no sense at all, I guess you just make posts to pump up your account.

Finally a (pre-)ICO for the neo-alchemists of the crypto world. I only wonder once you can make gold from water, if the price of gold goes down to the price of water, or water goes up to the price of gold. Or maybe they'll meet in the middle.

Hi, you are trying to estimate his impact by the number of citations, but he is Russian speaker and have no articles in English. In the Russian citation system I have found 70 citations in recent years.



Unlike your brother, Krivitskyi is doing research in the most controversial and complicated field. His work might have impact on the understanding of entire physics.

“Case in point... would you care to critique this paper for me?  Summarise?  Give thoughts on?  I'd love to know what you think of it.”
https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.1148

What for? This issue is not what I’m interested in. If you try to draw parallels with Lugano report, too bad for you. I gave you simple and clear science paper against your empty accusation, all you could give me in exchange – some nonsense useless theoretical paper about gravity?
Once again, if you want to criticize LENR, go on, but if you don’t understand at least fundamentals of physics, your message is waste of letters.

“I'm seeing eight in December, last year, seven the month before, nine before that, and it seems on average that he gets about eight times as many on the average month than your guy.  Know why?  Results!”

About that Results. This makes me laugh, as you didn’t mention your brother's full name. I guess around 90% of scientists doing useless work payed by taxpayers, Let me check if your brother does the same. Let's check if he is doing something useful for humanity or he is just a “Grant Eater”.

In 70s scientist used to say it is 10 years ahead, in 80s they said it is 20 years ahead, since 2000 they are saying it is in 40 years…
Then why would people spend billion while solar power according to calculations is already more convenient and cheap?
If you add the research spendings for thermonuclear fusion, it will clearly be the most useless and expensive source of energy. Read this: http://www.debatingeurope.eu/2011/08/31/is-nuclear-fusion-a-dead-end/#.WmCvxd9l-Uk
The main problem of Tokamak concept is that it is a dead end. It is obvious, but I see one believer…

"Why do not you ask for money for the project in Skolkovo or Chubais? They finance all kinds of garbage, and you have a project of global importance.

This project sounds like it is in anime movie, where people can transform an object into another object.
Interestingly enough the concept, If later on it would have been many investors who liked this project.
Good luck with the project.

Why?  Why would I duplicate the efforts of so many much more knowledgeable than I?  You'll find all those in the links I provided, and many many more if you can figure out this google thing.  You might want to add up both sides of that reaction equation and tell us all how the difference did not become gamma radiation.  Following that I'd love an explanation of how you change the binding energy in an atom.  See, that's your job... this right here, this is YOUR job.  Mine is elsewhere and I'm a busy man.


Convenient isn't it, to be able to put words in a dead man's mouth.  Thermonuclear fusion has been making steady progress for the last 60 years and is a challenge so difficult that nobody with a realistic understanding of the problem expects it to be solved in the next forty.  It is also irrelevant in this context.

Yes, I know how to find information.  That's where I got the "One citation" number from.  I have to agree that he is outstanding in the level of attention he has received since his first paper in the 80's.  For an academic to be cited in only one other person's research in his entire career is truly remarkable!  Meanwhile just yesterday my brother was cited in this paper...

THE REVIEW OF OBSERVER-CONTROLLED FACTORS ENSURING THE QUALITY OF RADAROMETRIC IMAGES TAKEN IN GBInSAR TECHNOLOGY AND THE METHODS OF THEIR VERIFICATION

On the fourth of this month he was cited in...

Monitoring Inter- and Intra-Seasonal Dynamics of Rapidly Degrading Ice-Rich Permafrost Riverbanks in the Lena Delta with TerraSAR-X Time Series

On the second in an instruction manual on landslide dynamics...

"Satellite Remote Sensing Techniques for Landslides Detection and Mapping"

I'm seeing eight in December, last year, seven the month before, nine before that, and it seems on average that he gets about eight times as many on the average month than your guy.  Know why?  Results!  Of course your average layman will not be able to read and properly interpret a paper on nuclear reactions, and neither would my brother for that matter, way out of his field.  This allows you to hold up any sort of crap and claim it constitutes proof, evidence, results.  But it doesn't fool anyone who CAN, and it didn't!  That is why he has been completely ignored his entire life, because the people in his field looked it over, many times no doubt, and to the one declared, "What a load of bollocks!"

Case in point... would you care to critique this paper for me?  Summarise?  Give thoughts on?  I'd love to know what you think of it.

https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.1148

The Invariant Set Postulate: A New Geometric Framework for the Foundations of Quantum Theory and the Role Played by Gravity

"A new law of physics is proposed, defined on the cosmological scale but with significant implications for the microscale. Motivated by nonlinear dynamical systems theory and black-hole thermodynamics, the Invariant Set Postulate proposes that cosmological states of physical reality belong to a non-computable fractal state-space geometry I, invariant under the action of some subordinate deterministic causal dynamics. An exploratory analysis is made of a possible causal realistic framework for quantum physics, based on key properties of I. For example, sparseness is used to relate generic counterfactual states to points not lying on I, thus providing a geometric basis for the essential contextuality of quantum physics and the role of the abstract Hilbert Space in quantum theory. Also, self-similarity, described in a symbolic setting, provides a possible "realistic" perspective on the essential role of complex numbers and quaternions in quantum theory. A new interpretation is given to the standard "mysteries" of quantum theory: superposition, measurement, nonlocality, emergence of classicality and so on. It is proposed that heterogeneities in the fractal geometry of I are manifestations of the phenomenon of gravity. Since quantum theory is inherently blind to the existence of such state-space geometries, the analysis here suggests that attempts to formulate unified theories of physics within a conventional quantum-theoretic framework are misguided, and that a successful quantum theory of gravity should unify the causal non-Euclidean geometry of space time with the atemporal fractal geometry of state space."

So.... does he know his stuff or is he just blowing smoke?

ICO’s today is the most advanced method of funding. It is already chosen by top companies. We think that we will stick to one single investor at latter stage, when we came to production.
Our work has nothing to do with alchemy. Base for our work is nuclear science and the most recent findings in LENR. We never claimed to have the ability of production of precious metals. We have seen the phenomenon of transmutation into platinum group metals and have a plan to bring it to the level of technology.
Please read our WP
Best regards
Roman

This is total joke .. no science is behind this  ..
at least for now

Sorry for being kinda rude but prove your claims !

That's what I'm saying, if you are doing so well, you could find a private sponsor who would be happy to finance your campaign looking at your results. You solved the problem over which the alchemists fought for several millennia and ask for money on the ICO? Any state will buy your technology for good money .... but may be something is wrong, since you chose this way

You can take a look at Krivitski's publications here: https://istina.msu.ru/profile/KrivitskyVA/

Dear AtomicNixon,
What you have written has nothing to do with LENR or science. Scientists don’t care about the personality of Rossi, his previous deeds. There is no need to believe, as you can check for your own. As we did.
Check Parkhomov’s replications.
And check Lugano report:
https://synthestech.com/LuganoReport.pdf
Try to criticize these facts.
You are also forgetting, that it wasn't Rossi, who invented Ni+H reaction, it was Focardi. Try to criticize him.
I saw your links, there is nothing interesting there and too many facts are misquoted and made up.
About “One real proper demonstration”, Rossi had at least two: Lugano and 1 year Industrial Heat report.
About “Three generations”: Thermonuclear fusion technology has been developed for 60 years without any results, it already costs hundreds of billions. But there are still believers…

Hello, thank you for your questions. We offer 25% bonus for our investors, so hurry up until it's too late.

We don't aim at disposal of toxic and radioactive elements and turning them into a safer state. The purpose of our research and experiments is quite different.

Firstly, it is really dangerous and unsafe; secondly, it is unclear even when radioactivity decreases, to what side this change occurs... it is an uncontrolled process.

Quit shouting!  Numerous?  Looked a little sparse to me.  Where are all his citations?  My brother is also a geologist and he gets about one a week.  Doesn't look like anybody thinks his research is worth following up on.

"Number of citations of articles in journals according to the Web of Science: 1, Scopus: 0 "

Wow.  That is truly abysmal.  Would you care to comment?

Yes!  Or rather, NO!  Have a read to get you up to speed.  E-Cat is only his latest and most successful long-running scam.  In his first one he convinced people that he could convert toxic waste into oil (sound familiar?) 

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/Andrea-Rossi-Energy-Catalyzer-Investigation-Index.shtml

"More than 100 Italian newspaper articles have published the facts of Rossi's Italian financial and environmental criminal history. After Rossi was released from prison, he began another energy scam, this time convincing the U.S. Army that he could develop thermoelectric devices that had record-breaking efficiency. After the Army funded Rossi, to its dismay, it learned that the devices Rossi promised would provide an output of 800 Watts each produced only 1 Watt."

And hey, that's the New Energy Times which actually believes in "low energy nuclear reactions". 

https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/accumulated-evidence-that-rossi-e-cat-was-fraud.html

"Krivits indicates that Rossi’s first trick was simple: He dumped hot water down a hole in the wall. Through carefully conceived methods of distraction, obfuscation, and lies about power measurements, he convinced the four professors — who didn’t know the kind of man they were up against — to take him at his word that all the water had been turned into steam."

Again, this is coming from true believers.   Believers... Three generations of Tesla groupies still haven't made one contribution.  Here is why another three generations of cold fusion believers should quit now.  Oh I can hear the cookie-cutter responses now... No imagination, where would we be if..., they said XXX was wrong, brainwashed by the establishment, blah blah blah... but these are all just mouth-noises a scammer makes when he sees his livelihood threatened.  Nobody with access to this sort of technology, if it worked, would be dumpster-diving in a place like this.  One real proper demonstration, which should be trivial, and they'd have billions shoved down their throats.

https://youtu.be/568iDYn8pjc?t=3m59s

Hi Dev. Are bonuses offered for investors? And how about Transmutation of toxic and radioactive elements to a safer state?

looking into this maybe good or maybe bad