With respect, it is not clear that you are far ahead of all existing scientific groups. You may be, but nothing on your site or in you patent documents proves this, moreover, clear things are redacted in your presentation material that make it impossible to be sure you understand the process. Though, as I said above, there are things you did say, that show you do have some understanding, but they were said a long time previously by Kenneth Radford Shoulders & S. V. Adamenko - the other thing you alluded to is clear to see in datasets from Le Claire, S. V. Adamenko and Suhas Ralkar amongst others.
It is certain that many groups have practical embodiments in the works and commercial ambitions, so your first statement is flat out wrong. An example of this is S. V. Adamenko's group who have not only synthesised nearly every element in the periodic table (and super heavy stable elements outside the periodic table), but have now moved to the US and are actively pursuing commercial objectives. Moreover, Adamenko published a detailed 700 page book describing their work in with no redactions.
There are some fora where you would be able to get away with this kind of messaging, but E-Cat World is not one of them, there are two many people that know too many things and you do your credibility a disservice by writing in this way.
Perhaps you are just a publicity person and have been mislead as to the uniqueness of your associates offering, in which case, you need to pass on this very small rebuttal to your sponsors and ask them to be more honest, since this is embarrassing.
Your technologists appear to be on the right track, as far as my understandings go and I wish you well.
It is certain that many groups have practical embodiments in the works and commercial ambitions, so your first statement is flat out wrong. An example of this is S. V. Adamenko's group who have not only synthesised nearly every element in the periodic table (and super heavy stable elements outside the periodic table), but have now moved to the US and are actively pursuing commercial objectives. Moreover, Adamenko published a detailed 700 page book describing their work in with no redactions.
There are some fora where you would be able to get away with this kind of messaging, but E-Cat World is not one of them, there are two many people that know too many things and you do your credibility a disservice by writing in this way.
Perhaps you are just a publicity person and have been mislead as to the uniqueness of your associates offering, in which case, you need to pass on this very small rebuttal to your sponsors and ask them to be more honest, since this is embarrassing.
Your technologists appear to be on the right track, as far as my understandings go and I wish you well.
Thank you for your Question,
1. About the claim, that we are ahead of everyone. You did compare our results with the ones of Adamenko. It seems that he has really obtained many elements including valuable ones. When you see his spectors, % of transmuted matter is high. But You are forgetting, that this XRF spectra is taken from micro spot that looked unusual. On other spots elemental composition is normal. That means the total amount of transmuted elements is critically low, these are just smallest spots after electroblast, that contain something. We conducted these experiments at the very beginning and concluded this to be a dead-end. Probably this was the reason why Adamenko has printed his work in so much details - it has no commercial perspectives.
2. Almost everyone, who carry out some research works in LENR, suffer from two things: Lack of funding and Complexities with calculations of efficiency. We had no problems with funding and didn't waste time on calculation. Only measurments of elemental composition before and after.
