Topic: [ANN][JPC]MAKE JACKPOTCOIN GREAT AGAIN! - page 328. (Read 470275 times)

So.. is there a chance to win jackpot when you mining on pool ?

Haha! Thought it might be you! I'm getting ~8.5 w/ 2x 660 FTW's and 1x 750Ti SC

I thought after Block 6000 its not that big anymore. My 7970 are hashing with 2,4MH/s ?!

I am having 65 MHash/s with a few nVidia cards. My co author Chris84 is around 35 MHash/s

Wow - someone jumped in at Cloudminers w/ over 60Mh/s. Sure knocked my take down a bit... lol!

HashHarder now Runs JackpotCoin

http://www.hashharder.com/jha/jackpotcoin






No Registration | Payout Direct to Wallet on Maturity

Cloudminers are not - I've got a payment from them few minutes ago

Another strange thing I realized:

Yesterday I've mined a block. While solo mining, QT assigns that income to new address for security reasons.
Today I've created new incoming address for a pool. And vualia - in transactions I see that address assigned to the mined block! Is that normal? No other QT does that! Correct me if I'm wrong. Especially waiting for DEV's comment.

cool the pool transfer details were updated i think.. testing it out now.

it says on all the pages a message on the top (never seen it on a pool before)


hey Chris why are you creating more pool accounts to spread your hash out ?
you were on top with 33/mh roughly then it was clearly split between anon plus Chris lol
only reason i can think of why someone would do that is to hide their activity... but ....i seen you
and i also guarantee that is Mr Kepler himself using ccminer lol

are all the pools on the wrong blockchain maybe?

IM IN!

hey what do you think people should use for scan-time on your pool ? i asked earlier but it got buried fast
i also thanked you for putting the pool up
firing up another machine to join in too..

edit:
almost forgot..


it says that on the pool.. can we up that ?

[2014-05-01 13:06:40] thread 0: 20971521 hashes, 4247 khash/s

Is it normal for gtx 680 ?

going to ignore me by replying back to me and then your going to report me for being arrogant ?

your hilarious kid LOL

not arrogant i have provided support for his program for a year to people and never gotten thanks.. (nothing but random bouts of snotty attitude from him)
i have reported bugs and he called me a liar rudely and then released a failed fix for it later
he has been a massive dick to me since day one.

who the hell are you buddy ?
i have wrote a ton of code and made a ton of mods on cudaminer and shared them with prob 100+ people in this scene over the last year

and report yourself prick..
i think you were posting this nvidia bragging here to piss me off and antagonize me then run your mouth when i replied.. you baited me ya little prick.

680. Thanks

Sorry, your using a 660 wasnt it? Its ccminer30.exe you need. Compute 3.0

Unforunately ccminer35 dont work too.



After it starts - stays like this. Not moveing.

You wonder why people ignore you. Your an ignorant person and you will be getting reported

http://acceleware.com/blog/keplers-shuffle-instruction

last paragraph is interesting

and by the way chubby i told you almost a year ago YES 64bit does make a difference and it's easy to prove too..
one is faster and one is slower.. i tested it back when i was the only guy and first to make a 64bit mod of your cudaminer before.

oh and why in gods name make another nvidia miner and have them both on the same page and have them both use the same original code based ?
seems to be ccminer is utterly pointless.. why not just update cudaminer itself rather than confusing the hell out of people with a second program
introduced to an already 500+ page topic ? lol

anyway you can shuffle this guy (guess what finger i'm holding up)  ahhaha

was it worth it screwing Fermi guys like me ? read that link ? get a good gain at making over complicated code for Kepler ?

ahh well fuck em.. maybe i'll do it up ? (Fermi compatible miner) and maybe i won't lol

edit:
it's hilarious you went out of your way to fuck over Fermi guys to use that shuffle function for a mediocre speed gain
which is precisely what 64bit does.. it pushed my Fermi card from about 80 to 84.5 simply compiling the same code for 64bit.

LOL i think your an idiot and i your still wrong when i told you that almost a year ago..
oh and did you fix those bugs like the program freezing that you called me a liar about for 2 months then announced a fix for ? (that failed still) lol
Remember that dumbass bullshit ? i could go on and on but all i will say is a VERY well known cgminer original dev said you were an asshole
and i said to him on chat like 7 months ago "I KNOW" i said i found that out the hard way too hahha and i didn't bring up the matter the other guy did lol

So yeah, i do think you fucked over Fermi guys as a fuck you to me *partly knowing full well i mod your code sometimes such as on this coin a few pages back..
once again. pretty assholish man but not surprising.