Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][LOC]UPDATE V1.4.5 OUT!! LOCO|Quark|PoW/PoS|HiPos|Masternodes|Tor[LOC][ANN] - page 44. (Read 88723 times)

legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
the wallet for me does not close in a regular way it remain there hanging for no reason

also i'm received block from pos, which are in another fork, i did already synched all the chain again
hero member
Activity: 1316
Merit: 504
Forked again it seems

My wallet reports back as it should and so too does the block explorer Wink, Have you tried just closing the wallet then re-opening mate.
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 250

getblockhash 39266 - 906e7469a524da203ff361be0774c75865ffa87ce6c814b9448a6db8d8ebb304

"blocks" : 39267,
"currentblocksize" : 1229,
version" : "v1.3.0.0-Alpha
"moneysupply" : 1843923

Next Network Blockat suprnova   39,269    (Current: 39,268)
Explorer also ok

Great my personal wallet have the same chain that the explorer and i can confirm a successful deposit on NOVA
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1036

i'm curious how you can force yr client to remain on the smaller chain at this point.

choose a shitnode and sync to it in closed mode:

connect=shitnode
listen=0


yeh. that's the only way i can get it to stay on taht chain :p
i'm wondering what they're connecting to, each other probably lol

legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1000
www.cryptodesign.cc

getblockhash 39266 - 906e7469a524da203ff361be0774c75865ffa87ce6c814b9448a6db8d8ebb304

"blocks" : 39267,
"currentblocksize" : 1229,
version" : "v1.3.0.0-Alpha
"moneysupply" : 1843923

Next Network Blockat suprnova   39,269    (Current: 39,268)
Explorer also ok
member
Activity: 119
Merit: 11

i'm curious how you can force yr client to remain on the smaller chain at this point.


choose a shitnode and sync to it in closed mode:

connect=shitnode
listen=0

this last fork is insignificant and will soon resolve, vast majority of nodes on the same chain,
but several bloody nodes produce orphans and it's no good, the same killed AMS

connect=node03.novaexchange.com:8057
listen=0

:-)
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 250
Novaexchange has taken LOCO into maintenance mode until this is sorted out, please pm me when it is time.

loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockhash 38289
6ea591f22faf6b84db8e52a415aa380c70a75cb491007f9cd9af926beca731b7

loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockhash 38431
080691109117a6313facc4291672a3690efd850374aa33b2f9d200dd26cc66a4

I guess those people that were on wrong chain once updated to 1.3 never did a clean index of the wallet with the correct peers, so the invalid fork is still ghosting around. I had my wallet offline the whole afternoon yesterday, and still picked up Bumbacoins chain.

I am at height when this is posted:
loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockcount
39216

coind getblockhash 39216
5b6f941effc391832e22171d646317e444ce0e3e2161bde4854ffecf26848dd8

Please keep me posted.

I have the same hashes for block 38289 - 38431 - 39216 in the block explorer and in my personal wallet but a like an hour ago I tried to send 100 loc to test nova so generate a new address in the page send the coins and the transaction got rejected, now the transaction show as aproved on the block explorer so it seem that we are in the same chain
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1036
it certainly seems the code has decided which chain it does prefer Smiley

 loco getblockhash 39216
5b6f941effc391832e22171d646317e444ce0e3e2161bde4854ffecf26848dd8





i'm curious how you can force yr client to remain on the smaller chain at this point.

i cant get one to stick with it, keeps reorganising and joining the more popular chain
 (purely wondering for educational purposes ofc) Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
Novaexchange has taken LOCO into maintenance mode until this is sorted out, please pm me when it is time.

loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockhash 38289
6ea591f22faf6b84db8e52a415aa380c70a75cb491007f9cd9af926beca731b7

loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockhash 38431
080691109117a6313facc4291672a3690efd850374aa33b2f9d200dd26cc66a4

I guess those people that were on wrong chain once updated to 1.3 never did a clean index of the wallet with the correct peers, so the invalid fork is still ghosting around. I had my wallet offline the whole afternoon yesterday, and still picked up Bumbacoins chain.

I am at height when this is posted:
loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockcount
39216

coind getblockhash 39216
5b6f941effc391832e22171d646317e444ce0e3e2161bde4854ffecf26848dd8

Please keep me posted.


Same height and blockhash on suprnova here

Does that mean youre on the same height and blockhash as Novaexchange aswell, or the same height as suprnova only?


Loco/src/locod getblockhash 39216
5b6f941effc391832e22171d646317e444ce0e3e2161bde4854ffecf26848dd8
member
Activity: 119
Merit: 11
Novaexchange has taken LOCO into maintenance mode until this is sorted out, please pm me when it is time.

loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockhash 38289
6ea591f22faf6b84db8e52a415aa380c70a75cb491007f9cd9af926beca731b7

loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockhash 38431
080691109117a6313facc4291672a3690efd850374aa33b2f9d200dd26cc66a4

I guess those people that were on wrong chain once updated to 1.3 never did a clean index of the wallet with the correct peers, so the invalid fork is still ghosting around. I had my wallet offline the whole afternoon yesterday, and still picked up Bumbacoins chain.

I am at height when this is posted:
loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockcount
39216

coind getblockhash 39216
5b6f941effc391832e22171d646317e444ce0e3e2161bde4854ffecf26848dd8

Please keep me posted.


Same height and blockhash on suprnova here

Does that mean youre on the same height and blockhash as Novaexchange aswell, or the same height as suprnova only?

Edit, had to read it twice to actually see what you wrote, ignore. :-)
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
Novaexchange has taken LOCO into maintenance mode until this is sorted out, please pm me when it is time.

loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockhash 38289
6ea591f22faf6b84db8e52a415aa380c70a75cb491007f9cd9af926beca731b7

loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockhash 38431
080691109117a6313facc4291672a3690efd850374aa33b2f9d200dd26cc66a4

I guess those people that were on wrong chain once updated to 1.3 never did a clean index of the wallet with the correct peers, so the invalid fork is still ghosting around. I had my wallet offline the whole afternoon yesterday, and still picked up Bumbacoins chain.

I am at height when this is posted:
loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockcount
39216

coind getblockhash 39216
5b6f941effc391832e22171d646317e444ce0e3e2161bde4854ffecf26848dd8

Please keep me posted.


Same height and blockhash on suprnova here
member
Activity: 119
Merit: 11
Novaexchange has taken LOCO into maintenance mode until this is sorted out, please pm me when it is time.

loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockhash 38289
6ea591f22faf6b84db8e52a415aa380c70a75cb491007f9cd9af926beca731b7

loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockhash 38431
080691109117a6313facc4291672a3690efd850374aa33b2f9d200dd26cc66a4

I guess those people that were on wrong chain once updated to 1.3 never did a clean index of the wallet with the correct peers, so the invalid fork is still ghosting around. I had my wallet offline the whole afternoon yesterday, and still picked up Bumbacoins chain.

I am at height when this is posted:
loco@ws03:~$ coind getblockcount
39216

coind getblockhash 39216
5b6f941effc391832e22171d646317e444ce0e3e2161bde4854ffecf26848dd8

Please keep me posted.
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1036
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1036
        "addr" : "188.33.82.204:57424",
        "startingheight" : 2123,
        "addr" : "104.207.133.150:44170",
        "startingheight" : 39060,
       "addr" : "196.210.72.59:55389",
        "startingheight" : 38897,

        "addr" : "151.77.195.64:61885",
        "startingheight" : 39060,
        "addr" : "93.86.119.180:50418",
        "startingheight" : 38746,
        "addr" : "46.233.42.249:34575",
        "startingheight" : 39060,
        "addr" : "176.36.240.68:34575",
        "startingheight" : 27159,
        "addr" : "198.50.229.39:34575",
        "startingheight" : 39060,
        "addr" : "77.28.58.168:53447",
        "startingheight" : 39060,
        "addr" : "[2001:41d0:8:656c::]:46556",
        "startingheight" : 39060,
       "addr" : "212.85.91.20:34575",
        "startingheight" : 38897,

        "addr" : "46.236.161.66:34575",
        "startingheight" : 10968,
        "addr" : "88.206.187.247:33767",
        "startingheight" : 39061,
        "addr" : "46.37.194.32:49782",
        "startingheight" : 39061,
        "addr" : "197.89.176.121:59469",
        "startingheight" : 39061,
        "addr" : "68.185.188.91:62738",
        "startingheight" : 20109,
        "addr" : "[2601:47:4202:5d50:753a:cea3:69f7:3695]:65050",
        "startingheight" : 39061,
        "addr" : "37.59.18.108:40030",
        "startingheight" : 39061,
        "addr" : "45.63.1.27:55274",
        "startingheight" : 39061,
        "addr" : "50.191.30.64:65056",
        "startingheight" : 39061,
        "addr" : "92.233.105.50:56414",
        "startingheight" : 39061,
        "addr" : "77.251.63.42:34575",
        "startingheight" : 7319,
        "addr" : "[2001:19f0:0:208c:7090:b8d0:7489:1b67]:57344",
        "startingheight" : 39061,
        "addr" : "213.202.214.140:34575",
        "startingheight" : 39061,
        "addr" : "[2a01:e35:2423:7280:a0f9:6e66:89b5:acda]:50235",
        "startingheight" : 39063,
        "addr" : "84.234.52.190:45476",
        "startingheight" : 39064,
       "addr" : "79.69.39.40:63872",
        "startingheight" : 38897,

        "addr" : "[2607:5300:60:5e6e::3c5:64b2]:34575",
        "startingheight" : 39066,
        "addr" : "[2002:b024:f044::b024:f044]:54265",
        "startingheight" : 27318,
       "addr" : "81.162.199.253:2257",
        "startingheight" : 38897,

        "addr" : "180.216.71.145:49775",
        "startingheight" : 39074,
        "addr" : "203.91.244.188:52552",
        "startingheight" : 39077,
        "addr" : "190.44.37.242:6099",
        "startingheight" : 23459,
        "addr" : "82.66.55.40:50588",
        "startingheight" : 39082,


it certainly seems that the vast majority of my peers are in agreeance with the xplorer.

root@vps:~/.loco# loco getblockhash 38289
6ea591f22faf6b84db8e52a415aa380c70a75cb491007f9cd9af926beca731b7
root@vps:~/.loco# loco getblockhash 38431
080691109117a6313facc4291672a3690efd850374aa33b2f9d200dd26cc66a4


only 4 or so seem on the fork featuring the hashes as featured by other users featured in bold Cheesy


loco getblockhash 38289
768182444286b91967de161bb35cbe396651547c55341bb08065f583d3066df5

loco getblockhash 38431
056c84dd712b96c46f50c61563cc0fdea33c902e61070be7bf32b0317d3264d2


--
i have synced twice to the other chain, and both times it's re-organised.
i'm curious as to who was on the other chain and has also reorganised
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 250
looks like it forked at #38166

REORGANIZE: Disconnect 720 blocks; 648d9ec26a94cd40bda5ab76e99fed40370a637da978ffbae0240c0526361720..eec3e771a5646 1990eeac9df4d179f68ccd98126aefedf581271c$
REORGANIZE: Connect 160 blocks; 648d9ec26a94cd40bda5ab76e99fed40370a637da978ffbae0240c0526361720..15295e0c39511 c7acb2250aa2c0fb4bdee55b4e201a0c77a4c6dc319$

http://198.50.229.39:3001/block/648d9ec26a94cd40bda5ab76e99fed40370a637da978ffbae0240c0526361720



-- the right chain ??

i give up Cheesy
no idea.

it does seem that nightz posted the different hash for..

ensure links on API page are valid
  "api": {
    "blockindex": 38289,
    "blockhash": "768182444286b91967de161bb35cbe396651547c55341bb08065f583d3066df5",
    "txhash": "31d1d24f3efd2a610e26f39a15daf787b091d6d56bb785160474ce3c42e458d9",
    "address": "68dmHTnpsrhCRACZ6MUFMymSho9G9PWjqU"


i've got other stuff to do so i'll come back later and see what other thoughts are.

maybe we will go multichain, LoL anyway those number were posted by me, I will recalculate and resync later maybe there are more ideas here by then
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1036
looks like it forked at #38166

REORGANIZE: Disconnect 720 blocks; 648d9ec26a94cd40bda5ab76e99fed40370a637da978ffbae0240c0526361720..eec3e771a5646 1990eeac9df4d179f68ccd98126aefedf581271c$
REORGANIZE: Connect 160 blocks; 648d9ec26a94cd40bda5ab76e99fed40370a637da978ffbae0240c0526361720..15295e0c39511 c7acb2250aa2c0fb4bdee55b4e201a0c77a4c6dc319$

http://198.50.229.39:3001/block/648d9ec26a94cd40bda5ab76e99fed40370a637da978ffbae0240c0526361720



-- the right chain ??

i give up Cheesy
no idea.

it does seem that nightz posted the different hash for..
edit (ok. maybe he just agreed with the hash.. it's not entirely clear tbh)

ensure links on API page are valid
  "api": {
    "blockindex": 38289,
    "blockhash": "768182444286b91967de161bb35cbe396651547c55341bb08065f583d3066df5",
    "txhash": "31d1d24f3efd2a610e26f39a15daf787b091d6d56bb785160474ce3c42e458d9",
    "address": "68dmHTnpsrhCRACZ6MUFMymSho9G9PWjqU"


i've got other stuff to do so i'll come back later and see what other thoughts are.
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 250
FURTHER TO THE ABOVE POST

ok. that hash actually looks correct.
i've just passed that block and share the same hashes

loco getblockhash 38289
768182444286b91967de161bb35cbe396651547c55341bb08065f583d3066df5

loco getblockhash 38431
056c84dd712b96c46f50c61563cc0fdea33c902e61070be7bf32b0317d3264d2

omg and stuff

those above, i used
connect=212.85.91.20

then i removed that restarted. and looks like the wallet "fixed itself"

now i get..

root@vps:~/.loco# loco getblockhash 38289
6ea591f22faf6b84db8e52a415aa380c70a75cb491007f9cd9af926beca731b7
root@vps:~/.loco# loco getblockhash 38431
080691109117a6313facc4291672a3690efd850374aa33b2f9d200dd26cc66a4

lmao

So we can say that we are on the right chain?
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1036
FURTHER TO THE ABOVE POST

ok. that hash actually looks correct.
i've just passed that block and share the same hashes

loco getblockhash 38289
768182444286b91967de161bb35cbe396651547c55341bb08065f583d3066df5

loco getblockhash 38431
056c84dd712b96c46f50c61563cc0fdea33c902e61070be7bf32b0317d3264d2

omg and stuff

those above, i used
connect=212.85.91.20

then i removed that restarted. and looks like the wallet "fixed itself"

now i get..

root@vps:~/.loco# loco getblockhash 38289
6ea591f22faf6b84db8e52a415aa380c70a75cb491007f9cd9af926beca731b7
root@vps:~/.loco# loco getblockhash 38431
080691109117a6313facc4291672a3690efd850374aa33b2f9d200dd26cc66a4

lmao
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 250
FURTHER TO THE ABOVE POST

ok. that hash actually looks correct.
i've just passed that block and share the same hashes

loco getblockhash 38289
768182444286b91967de161bb35cbe396651547c55341bb08065f583d3066df5

loco getblockhash 38431
056c84dd712b96c46f50c61563cc0fdea33c902e61070be7bf32b0317d3264d2

Code:
22:44:31

getblockhash 38289


22:44:31

6ea591f22faf6b84db8e52a415aa380c70a75cb491007f9cd9af926beca731b7


22:48:21

getblockhash 38431


22:48:21

080691109117a6313facc4291672a3690efd850374aa33b2f9d200dd26cc66a4



it seems like my wallets forked
Pages:
Jump to: