Topic: [ANN][LOC]UPDATE V1.4.5 OUT!! LOCO|Quark|PoW/PoS|HiPos|Masternodes|Tor[LOC][ANN] - page 50. (Read 88708 times)

OK guys I really need some help here
Sintoms
- I take a random ID transaction from my wallet and put on the search bar of the explorer, and it show me the details of that transaction, perfect BUT sometimes it shows
"Error! : Search found no results for:xxxxxxxxxxxxxx".
Now I select a random hash from the  screen click it, got to address bar and paste my transaction ID after "http://198.50.229.39:3001/tx/PASTE_YOUR _ID_HERE"
It actually show the the details of the transaction
Now the weir thing is that if now I come back to block-explorer homepage and put my transaction ID in the search bar it also show me the details the the transaction and no more errors.

Really I don't know how to fix this, I was planning to wipe out the database of the explorer and erase the .loco folder (except the wallet and conf file) and build again from scratch but if any of you have any idea about this issue, I'll be much greatfull (I'm not asking a magic solution, just put me in the right way)

hmmm, and firefox gives me empty pages for all 3 links.

I test setup masternodes, but i dont have 30000 loco to start it. Any help my?  - masternodes adrress 5qwe73uAy8iBpuhX1Uwi5yRHEFsqM7T67h

Not quite get it (noob), but I'll look for a solution, I bet in the way I'll understand your answer    thanks for the feedback

for some strange reason the insight explorers put one of the block tx hashs on the main page , rather than using the block hash

it's kind of annoying , and disturbing at first cos it looks like the wrong chain until you realise how annoying it is


i've never looked at it enough to know whether its simply changeable or not,  i am quite interested to know though .


--

http://198.50.229.39:3001/tx/cf774b7ecbb2d9b01e5155d06ce890252c0fdb28235cc8a533400ec1f58ae268
http://198.50.229.39:3001/address/66vNgX7iTJGi2a9QycKntJ5xrGcvb5uPJi
http://198.50.229.39:3001/block/6c437ac2a8ebe6b1bdcc6100d4ceae27257b117a08563553bbc3ec0281425330

all work for me, they're all from block 100
if it's an incorrect hash it seems to take me to the main page.

CONGRATULATIONZ  

Lets make MERRY   so we can make MONEY          

i checked old and new blocks, ANY /block/ url gives me empty page.
so i guess it's not the second question, there are no records for block hashes at all.
i don't know how explorer obtains hashes but when i program rpc calls,
in getblock output tx data are at least one level deeper in json than mint and blockhash,
no chance to get it wrong

affirmative, BUT why txid instead of block hash ??
and it gives me empty page for any url like http://198.50.229.39:3001/block/***********

e.g. block 33113 wallet output (compare to explorer):

{
"hash" : "6f0ccf77b41c1e97347658a0aee3d6f6c03674331ba70f23848207737bdfead7",
"confirmations" : 1,
"size" : 446,
"height" : 33113,
"version" : 7,
"merkleroot" : "6a8dd5ab51e9a8ca8412c0846922513f2c38b82a9b342d9c5b47f38aa05fac20",
"mint" : 9.97282830,
"time" : 1461960704,
"nonce" : 0,
"bits" : "1b00ce32",
"difficulty" : 81364.41026030,
"blocktrust" : "13dd5a6dc7877",
"chaintrust" : "2b5a8d9ae8d9298a",
"previousblockhash" : "2b7c953d791cece92bde9a248c6aaaf67bc2b7517ab4b786b4af1cb080c66ca7",
"flags" : "proof-of-stake",
"proofhash" : "000b355744b9e432a87b6954e41adcc338fd28243cabcfd8324af5887c8063b0",
"entropybit" : 1,
"modifier" : "a58aef6fc49b734f",
"modifierv2" : "c5285d9219749b20626ab14a7192e721308009d2b2d500677ede08ac1cf1c9cc",
"tx" : [
{
"txid" : "699a49afaceece51cfd066467892d2b25d76a5266ffb3b4e4bc1581c71385b19",
"txid" : "699a49afaceece51cfd066467892d2b25d76a5266ffb3b4e4bc1581c71385b19",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1461960704,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"coinbase" : "03598100",
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 0.00000000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "",
"hex" : "",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
}
]
},
{
"txid" : "0b18bb200452d087eaefdbc0771838831353b98e7252bd81762eacbdc81e1837",
"txid" : "0b18bb200452d087eaefdbc0771838831353b98e7252bd81762eacbdc81e1837",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1461960704,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "f6a980f6c9ef1ebad5d7a51562136e4035c91fc534d469843e7cc7ef0dffb6b5",
"vout" : 1,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "304502210095bb65674936935c116416209771493472052e606c3937aff02084df6bc4d7da02206 f067fe5391125f31811dbac19ed4fb6c4e9b893f4c3039fa6490d41f4f2c17801",
"hex" : "48304502210095bb65674936935c116416209771493472052e606c3937aff02084df6bc4d7da022 06f067fe5391125f31811dbac19ed4fb6c4e9b893f4c3039fa6490d41f4f2c17801"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 0.00000000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "",
"hex" : "",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
},
{
"value" : 2072.73000000,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "029fb1e5e35fdc732a474c38a8b7582ef25146ef44067bb0b297398075556aad40 OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "21029fb1e5e35fdc732a474c38a8b7582ef25146ef44067bb0b297398075556aad40ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkey",
"addresses" : [
"5uRHLJgnsQUc6YM7rZBpPUds7k1dBVp1te"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 2072.73282830,
"n" : 2,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "029fb1e5e35fdc732a474c38a8b7582ef25146ef44067bb0b297398075556aad40 OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "21029fb1e5e35fdc732a474c38a8b7582ef25146ef44067bb0b297398075556aad40ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkey",
"addresses" : [
"5uRHLJgnsQUc6YM7rZBpPUds7k1dBVp1te"
]
}
}
]
}
],
"signature" : "3045022100a60b6738764927854f4b38f9fa2e07d9e4d5b3926dfbf9d66b85aecf9c379bed02204 a4b348fc16d644cc68df43414f83bf3f9df00bf845613704341503a81e8ee18"
}

So, when it will be online?

Novaexchange is running Go 1.2

Incompatiblity with current secp256k1 is one, i had to take measures to have two second versions on the system without them overwriting each other. Using custom commands in the build commands to link to the corresponding libraries. I run the wallets in docker images, so i could solve it that way to force the right libs into the container and run it. But if anyone is running more than one wallet on a machine using the same libs but different versions, than they will run into the same problem.

best=07bfb92040d6e78a5c35dd2d4bf77d0a8b1387248cc42e0fa09b41d5637f8af1  height=32101

it's the simplest way to tell ..


-
sent test coins to nova, they're on same chain it seems .. hmm, unless the transaction was valid on all forks etc etc .. lol