[ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 1345.

Black Mamba

hero member

Activity: 656

Merit: 500

Don't Trust Words

Quote from: sluppy on May 24, 2016, 10:44:06 AM

Quote from: CryptoMrM on May 24, 2016, 10:31:38 AM

Quote from: mirrorcrax on May 24, 2016, 10:30:56 AM

If Polo & Kraken don't offer Lisk on launch,are you guys still gonna go for Yo Bit and Bloombit?

100% not Bloombit. YoBit maybe.

Chances that Kraken will list it on launch are 0.
Having 10btc or even 1btc on yobit is only for the brave/stupid.
Hopefully Bittrex and Poloniex will list it from launch but that's up to the devs if they reached out to them or they could spend some of the ICO to get us on at least one "trustworthy" exchange.(bittrex lists for money)

Personally id be very hesitant to send anything of real value to Yobit or Bloombit.

No problem

More cheap coins on yobit and c-cex for me Cool

ibrahim11

hero member

Activity: 777

Merit: 500

Quote from: joe 90 on May 24, 2016, 10:41:28 AM

Quote from: pugilist555 on May 24, 2016, 10:35:17 AM

Quote from: Calabi–Yau Manifold on May 24, 2016, 10:33:27 AM

Quote from: mirrorcrax on May 24, 2016, 10:30:56 AM

If Polo & Kraken don't offer Lisk on launch,are you guys still gonna go for Yo Bit and Bloombit?

No we're going to bittrex and btc-e Cheesy

Is bittrex adding it tonight?

We don't know, all we know for sure is yobit and c-cex are adding it tonight. IMO bittrex will add it tonight, there's money to be made from trading fees and bittrex won't want to let yobit cut into its profits.

I've transferred my btc to bittrex but then should I transfer some to C-cex??

LiskHQ

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 509

Decentralized Application Platform

Quote from: michaelwang33 on May 24, 2016, 09:38:38 AM

This means you "invest" into the sidechain. In this example legally the LSK on the app owner account belongs to him. There are more solutions. Additionally, the blockchain industry and our team consists of extremely intelligent individuals who will find even more solutions. We are releasing now to see exactly how Lisk sidechains should be structured, we want to build our product around the user.

sluppy

legendary

Activity: 2020

Merit: 1041

Quote from: CryptoMrM on May 24, 2016, 10:31:38 AM

Quote from: mirrorcrax on May 24, 2016, 10:30:56 AM

If Polo & Kraken don't offer Lisk on launch,are you guys still gonna go for Yo Bit and Bloombit?

100% not Bloombit. YoBit maybe.

Chances that Kraken will list it on launch are 0.
Having 10btc or even 1btc on yobit is only for the brave/stupid.
Hopefully Bittrex and Poloniex will list it from launch but that's up to the devs if they reached out to them or they could spend some of the ICO to get us on at least one "trustworthy" exchange.(bittrex lists for money)

Personally id be very hesitant to send anything of real value to Yobit or Bloombit.

michaelwang33

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Quote from: tempus on May 24, 2016, 10:36:29 AM

Quote from: michaelwang33 on May 24, 2016, 10:23:35 AM

Quote from: tempus on May 24, 2016, 10:05:03 AM

Quote from: michaelwang33 on May 24, 2016, 09:38:38 AM

You won't find a project in Crypto that is already finished and big business. All big projects are work in progress and about future potential. Or do you believe Ethereum is already worth it's marketcap for real? Or Factom, my favorite, also not the system yet it will be after the release of the full protocol.

The question is not, if a system is perfect at launch. No project ever was, and Ethereum was pretty scary btw. (and still is in my opinion). The question is, if a team has the ability to realize what is planned - and if they are able to work hard, if they are serious and legit. And of course it's also about the potential business-model.

The thing is: If you analyze all this in LISK, there may be weak points like everywhere. But what I'm totally sure about: The idea has a lot of potential. The team is legit and hard working and growing. And they have a plan.

Just for example: Many believe the marketing is just about the price. But it's not. It's out of the conclusion that a project needs attention, not just because of exchanges and trading, but even more to grow, to attract Devs to develop for LISK. And the combination of a lot of attention and financial incentive (not too cheap prices) is very promising.

If it will work out as planned, and if they are able to avoid mistakes that would be hard to solve, LISK has a lot of potential. In short- and even more in longterm.

indeed ive never once said ethereum should be where it is. if it is you thank whales. ive just pulled out a weak point something i noticed and have said they have money to close these flaws. others saying if they set it up wrong but shouldn't the funds be protected from the start why does lisk even give developers the option to "SET IT UP CORRECTLY". then they say dapps when the owner can run off with the funds. if they set it up correctly then it won't be misused but if it isn't bye bye user's funds.

max even said he is working on this to make it more trustless

Nothing wrong with it to point on possible weaknesses. I just wanted to say that it's always about good development, finding solutions and before all: avoiding steps that would lead into a direction with possibly unsolvable problems. I believe that is one of the highest risk in all projects, because the technology is very young. LISK has one big advantage in my opinion: the side-chain-concept on a stable base. That already has some value because it can grow into all kinds of use-cases.

indeed max spoke of blockstream facing the same issues which they have not resolved yet

a second thing i wanted to ask was the DPoS protocol for dApps differs in that the dApp creator PERSONALLY APPROVES who can "mine" the dapp-sidechain. if a value is associated with an appcoin in a sidechain, against LISK, or a decent buy-wall is built for it, dapp owners can adjust the DPOS list of active delegates and abuse the system to gain disproportionate mining rewards, short term. the validity checking for delegate voting on the main chain may be open enough to scrutiny, but dapp sidechains on LISK dont have that

MrWhiteBites

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 511

Im the One who Knocks.

Quote from: ?? on ??

~~Morgen~~ Today...

Quote from: thiel on May 23, 2016, 02:40:20 PM

Morgen ist es soweit

The Lisk rocket takes off!

Rocket just blew past the Ethereum rocket that falling back to earth with a BIG Crash! Vitalik Butterin Cashing out Ethereum to buy LISK!

DM0000

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: ensjovis on May 24, 2016, 09:18:58 AM

Buterin does NOT approve.

lol

joe 90

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

Quote from: pugilist555 on May 24, 2016, 10:35:17 AM

Quote from: Calabi–Yau Manifold on May 24, 2016, 10:33:27 AM

Quote from: mirrorcrax on May 24, 2016, 10:30:56 AM

If Polo & Kraken don't offer Lisk on launch,are you guys still gonna go for Yo Bit and Bloombit?

No we're going to bittrex and btc-e Cheesy

Is bittrex adding it tonight?

We don't know, all we know for sure is yobit and c-cex are adding it tonight. IMO bittrex will add it tonight, there's money to be made from trading fees and bittrex won't want to let yobit cut into its profits.

lisker

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

Quote from: andrew24p on May 24, 2016, 10:37:35 AM

what was the dollar price per lisk if you contributed to the crowdsale on day 1?

About 0.08 $

cannabanana

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 501

Quote from: andrew24p on May 24, 2016, 10:37:35 AM

what was the dollar price per lisk if you contributed to the crowdsale on day 1?

andrew24p

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

what was the dollar price per lisk if you contributed to the crowdsale on day 1?

tempus

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1128

Quote from: michaelwang33 on May 24, 2016, 10:23:35 AM

Quote from: tempus on May 24, 2016, 10:05:03 AM

Quote from: michaelwang33 on May 24, 2016, 09:38:38 AM

You won't find a project in Crypto that is already finished and big business. All big projects are work in progress and about future potential. Or do you believe Ethereum is already worth it's marketcap for real? Or Factom, my favorite, also not the system yet it will be after the release of the full protocol.

The question is not, if a system is perfect at launch. No project ever was, and Ethereum was pretty scary btw. (and still is in my opinion). The question is, if a team has the ability to realize what is planned - and if they are able to work hard, if they are serious and legit. And of course it's also about the potential business-model.

The thing is: If you analyze all this in LISK, there may be weak points like everywhere. But what I'm totally sure about: The idea has a lot of potential. The team is legit and hard working and growing. And they have a plan.

Just for example: Many believe the marketing is just about the price. But it's not. It's out of the conclusion that a project needs attention, not just because of exchanges and trading, but even more to grow, to attract Devs to develop for LISK. And the combination of a lot of attention and financial incentive (not too cheap prices) is very promising.

If it will work out as planned, and if they are able to avoid mistakes that would be hard to solve, LISK has a lot of potential. In short- and even more in longterm.

indeed ive never once said ethereum should be where it is. if it is you thank whales. ive just pulled out a weak point something i noticed and have said they have money to close these flaws. others saying if they set it up wrong but shouldn't the funds be protected from the start why does lisk even give developers the option to "SET IT UP CORRECTLY". then they say dapps when the owner can run off with the funds. if they set it up correctly then it won't be misused but if it isn't bye bye user's funds.

max even said he is working on this to make it more trustless

Nothing wrong with it to point on possible weaknesses. I just wanted to say that it's always about good development, finding solutions and before all: avoiding steps that would lead into a direction with possibly unsolvable problems. I believe that is one of the highest risk in all projects, because the technology is very young. LISK has one big advantage in my opinion: the side-chain-concept on a stable base. That already has some value because it can grow into all kinds of use-cases.

pugilist555

sr. member

Activity: 474

Merit: 261

GBM

Quote from: Calabi–Yau Manifold on May 24, 2016, 10:33:27 AM

Quote from: mirrorcrax on May 24, 2016, 10:30:56 AM

If Polo & Kraken don't offer Lisk on launch,are you guys still gonna go for Yo Bit and Bloombit?

No we're going to bittrex and btc-e Cheesy

Is bittrex adding it tonight?

cienki7

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: mirrorcrax on May 24, 2016, 10:30:56 AM

If Polo & Bittrex don't offer Lisk on launch,are you guys still gonna go for Yo Bit and Bloombit?

Yobit seams to be ok, I have some btc ready there for launch

Calabi–Yau Manifold

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: mirrorcrax on May 24, 2016, 10:30:56 AM

If Polo & Kraken don't offer Lisk on launch,are you guys still gonna go for Yo Bit and Bloombit?

No we're going to bittrex and btc-e Cheesy

crilleaz

full member

Activity: 236

Merit: 100

★ Always strive for the best ★

Quote from: mirrorcrax on May 24, 2016, 10:30:56 AM

If Polo & Kraken don't offer Lisk on launch,are you guys still gonna go for Yo Bit and Bloombit?

Bittrex is way better than those exchanges.

CryptoMrM

hero member

Activity: 722

Merit: 500

Quote from: mirrorcrax on May 24, 2016, 10:30:56 AM

If Polo & Kraken don't offer Lisk on launch,are you guys still gonna go for Yo Bit and Bloombit?

100% not Bloombit. YoBit maybe.

Calabi–Yau Manifold

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mr.Ease on May 24, 2016, 10:29:06 AM

In the upcoming chaos... Someone will be trampled by the Liskers and probably DIE

You mean ETH holders? Cool

mirrorcrax

member

Activity: 82

Merit: 10

If Polo & Bittrex don't offer Lisk on launch,are you guys still gonna go for Yo Bit and Bloombit?

tempus

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1128

Folks, just a little reminder:

FUD is not a bad sign because it's always with intention. What does it say between the lines?

Most important: Those who spread FUD are not invested.

What could their intentions be?

Sometimes they act out of psychological weaknesses, envy for example. But mostly they act out of competition with a project they are invested in, or/and because they want to buy cheap.

What they don't do: Writing posts with good arguments to underline negative claims.

Conclusion: FUD is a good sign.

Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 1345. (Read 3074324 times)