anyone mistaking this kind of HUMOR for reality needs to get their grape checked out.
Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 1612. (Read 3074324 times)
April 25, 2016, 04:45:46 PM
anyone mistaking this kind of HUMOR for reality needs to get their grape checked out.
April 25, 2016, 04:43:42 PM
they claimed to be the successor of ethereum but they never created the code to handle the amount of transactions a successor to eth would. did they not believe in their coin. amazing imagine if people knew this before this would be a whole different story. i predict more errors after launch code is unfinished and done quickly release it next year check it thoroughly
"They" never claimed such a thing. Quite the opposite. (or do you wanna provide some quotes?)
Others claimed all sort of things pro and con, but what can the devs any dev can do about community posts?
This is crypto ppl run their mouth out of ignorance, hidden agenda, for fun or just boredom.
April 25, 2016, 04:41:12 PM
The news has begun to spread. Be ready, in one month the full Lisk release will be here.
http://themerkle.com/lisk-launch-date-is-set-to-may-the-24th/
http://www.econotimes.com/Decentralized-Startup-Lisk%C2%A0To-Launch-Its-Platform-On-May-24-199778
http://themerkle.com/lisk-launch-date-is-set-to-may-the-24th/
http://www.econotimes.com/Decentralized-Startup-Lisk%C2%A0To-Launch-Its-Platform-On-May-24-199778
why not set the date at summer 2016?
LOL
April 25, 2016, 04:30:54 PM
I really hope they don't due another delay after May 24th. The information could of been explained openly but they didn't. They waited to the last 6 days of April. Bow they claim they won't do it again. It is getting hard to believe them. You don't need to wait to hire people after the coinbase funds are released. Plenty of developers would work and get paid afterwards. This is a big crowdfunding campaign. You must be transparent when it comes to crowdfunding. Not after the community was let down twice because of your poor communication skills. I do believe in the tech behind Lisk but as of now it ends there.
April 25, 2016, 04:28:07 PM
sell me your lisk i want it
April 25, 2016, 04:27:46 PM
I'm starting to lose faith in LISK.
I don't know why but it makes me feel like OP is delaying the announce for nothing, providing a security excuse which can easily be overcome by a week at most.
Its unnecessary to postpone by a month.
I don't know why but it makes me feel like OP is delaying the announce for nothing, providing a security excuse which can easily be overcome by a week at most.
Its unnecessary to postpone by a month.
Don't be surprised if they came with an early launch but they set on 24th to be sure that not delay it again.
April 25, 2016, 04:24:39 PM
I'm starting to lose faith in LISK.
I don't know why but it makes me feel like OP is delaying the announce for nothing, providing a security excuse which can easily be overcome by a week at most.
Its unnecessary to postpone by a month.
I don't know why but it makes me feel like OP is delaying the announce for nothing, providing a security excuse which can easily be overcome by a week at most.
Its unnecessary to postpone by a month.
go take a breather for a minute and come back. The world has not ended yet.
April 25, 2016, 04:23:30 PM
I'm starting to lose faith in LISK.
I don't know why but it makes me feel like OP is delaying the announce for nothing, providing a security excuse which can easily be overcome by a week at most.
Its unnecessary to postpone by a month.
I don't know why but it makes me feel like OP is delaying the announce for nothing, providing a security excuse which can easily be overcome by a week at most.
Its unnecessary to postpone by a month.
April 25, 2016, 04:23:17 PM
As a programmer i know that one month delay is still pretty good and i'm not even mad. It's really good that they find a hole and can fix it, because it will be terrible to find this after release. What i don't understand is why the hell they want to use SQLlite anyway ? It got terrible performance in higher number of inserts and updates. PostgreSQL will be much better choice.
Crypti was (is) using SQLite, as a fork Lisk is using it also, the code is result of a 2 year development. But it was never really stress tested, with little interest from the community. As the test net was set up for lisk and hundreds of potential delegates started running nodes, sending transactions, testing stuff, it turned out that the current code can't handle the amount of transactions Lisk can expect after launch, not even with the optimalization and bug fixes Oliver made to the original crypti code since the fork.they claimed to be the successor of ethereum but they never created the code to handle the amount of transactions a successor to eth would. did they not believe in their coin. amazing imagine if people knew this before this would be a whole different story. i predict more errors after launch code is unfinished and done quickly release it next year check it thoroughly
crypti had less than 750k to work with for 2 years. Eth blew 15 million in two years.
blew 22mil if u count loss on btc price cause they couldnt agree together to sell it ;
dont worry, lisk has to burn the 7 mil, look FOR second funding, wait a year and not have a proper wallet, to even be close to ETH
exactly, ETH has to pick up a second funding round for about 200 Million to come close to the ratio of crypti/lisk ico amounts.
and Lisk will use the funds wisely like the rocketchat instead of BURN on stupid stuff like $300 a month forum bill. They already show they want a good coin above money from this delay. They push back their own funding every time also.
April 25, 2016, 04:21:53 PM
where the hell is the dev/are the devs with some answers? Its the minimum they can do, to face us here because we feel really let down!
If they were here to be your punching bag then others would be slamming them for not working. They just released new info yesterday, it just wasn't what people wanted to hear.
April 25, 2016, 04:18:39 PM
As a programmer i know that one month delay is still pretty good and i'm not even mad. It's really good that they find a hole and can fix it, because it will be terrible to find this after release. What i don't understand is why the hell they want to use SQLlite anyway ? It got terrible performance in higher number of inserts and updates. PostgreSQL will be much better choice.
Crypti was (is) using SQLite, as a fork Lisk is using it also, the code is result of a 2 year development. But it was never really stress tested, with little interest from the community. As the test net was set up for lisk and hundreds of potential delegates started running nodes, sending transactions, testing stuff, it turned out that the current code can't handle the amount of transactions Lisk can expect after launch, not even with the optimalization and bug fixes Oliver made to the original crypti code since the fork.they claimed to be the successor of ethereum but they never created the code to handle the amount of transactions a successor to eth would. did they not believe in their coin. amazing imagine if people knew this before this would be a whole different story. i predict more errors after launch code is unfinished and done quickly release it next year check it thoroughly
crypti had less than 750k to work with for 2 years. Eth blew 15 million in two years.
blew 22mil if u count loss on btc price cause they couldnt agree together to sell it ;
dont worry, lisk has to burn the 7 mil, look FOR second funding, wait a year and not have a proper wallet, to even be close to ETH
April 25, 2016, 04:15:21 PM
As a programmer i know that one month delay is still pretty good and i'm not even mad. It's really good that they find a hole and can fix it, because it will be terrible to find this after release. What i don't understand is why the hell they want to use SQLlite anyway ? It got terrible performance in higher number of inserts and updates. PostgreSQL will be much better choice.
Crypti was (is) using SQLite, as a fork Lisk is using it also, the code is result of a 2 year development. But it was never really stress tested, with little interest from the community. As the test net was set up for lisk and hundreds of potential delegates started running nodes, sending transactions, testing stuff, it turned out that the current code can't handle the amount of transactions Lisk can expect after launch, not even with the optimalization and bug fixes Oliver made to the original crypti code since the fork.they claimed to be the successor of ethereum but they never created the code to handle the amount of transactions a successor to eth would. did they not believe in their coin. amazing imagine if people knew this before this would be a whole different story. i predict more errors after launch code is unfinished and done quickly release it next year check it thoroughly
crypti had less than 750k to work with for 2 years. Eth blew 15 million in two years.
April 25, 2016, 04:14:29 PM
Lisk: Release am 24. Mai 2016
April 25, 2016UncategorizedAltcoin, Axel Hellinger, Boris Povod, Crypti, Ether, Ethereum, ICO, Joel Fernández, Joel O. Fernández, Kanzlei Hellinger, Lisk, Max Kordek, Olivier Beddows, Sidechain, Smart Contracts, XCR
Lisk
Es gibt Neuigkeiten bei Lisk: Es gibt jetzt ein konkretes Release-Datum. Lisk wird am 24. Mai erscheinen. Das ist eine erneute Verzögerung um vier Wochen. Laut dem Blog von Lisk gibt es dafür mehrere Gründe. Zunächst einmal hatte sich das Netzwerk beim Testen als nicht stabil erwiesen, so das sein Transaktionslimit von 10 pro Block notwendig wurde. Dies wurde von CEO Max und Chef-Entwickler Oli als nicht effektiv angesehen, so dass Oli umfangreiche Änderungen im Code vornahm. So wurde die Blockchain-Database von SQLite zu PostgreSQL umgecoded. Zudem gab es umfangreiche Optimierungen bei Geschwindigkeit und Synchronisation. Max und Oli sind mit dem Ergebnis sehr zufrieden. Lisk sei dadurch stabiler und schneller geworden. Im Endeffekt ist Lisk jetzt die vielen Kinderkrankheiten von Crypti losgeworden, welche das Projekt seit 2014 begleitet hatten.
Fazit: Ich bin weiterhin der Meinung, dass Verzögerungen bis zu einem gewissen Grad ICO-Investoren helfen, da dadurch der Bekanntheitsgrad erhöht wird und es mehr interessierte Nutzer gibt, welche gerne investiert hätten aber nicht mehr zum Zuge gekommen sind. So wären Kursgewinne bei Lisk unmittelbar nach dem ICO wohl sehr dünn ausgefallen – das gilt übrigens auch für IOTA. Das dadurch auch eine weitere Optimierung von Lisk eingetreten ist, kann nur helfen. Lisk Investoren sollten sich also über die erneute Verzögerung nicht ärgern. Die Informationspolitik von Max, Oli und Joel ist vorbildlich und sucht bei Kryptos ihresgleichen. Ich lege mich jetzt schon fest und erwarte eine Marktkapitalisierung von über 10 Millionen Dollar von Lisk zum Start – sofern alles glattläuft.
Disclaimer – Hinweis auf Interessenskonflikt: Der Autor ist selbst in Lisk investiert.
https://altcoinspekulant.wordpress.com/
what the fuck?
April 25, 2016, 04:09:27 PM
As a programmer i know that one month delay is still pretty good and i'm not even mad. It's really good that they find a hole and can fix it, because it will be terrible to find this after release. What i don't understand is why the hell they want to use SQLlite anyway ? It got terrible performance in higher number of inserts and updates. PostgreSQL will be much better choice.
Crypti was (is) using SQLite, as a fork Lisk is using it also, the code is result of a 2 year development. But it was never really stress tested, with little interest from the community. As the test net was set up for lisk and hundreds of potential delegates started running nodes, sending transactions, testing stuff, it turned out that the current code can't handle the amount of transactions Lisk can expect after launch, not even with the optimalization and bug fixes Oliver made to the original crypti code since the fork.they claimed to be the successor of ethereum but they never created the code to handle the amount of transactions a successor to eth would. did they not believe in their coin. amazing imagine if people knew this before this would be a whole different story. i predict more errors after launch code is unfinished and done quickly release it next year check it thoroughly
April 25, 2016, 04:09:02 PM
Lisk: Release am 24. Mai 2016
April 25, 2016UncategorizedAltcoin, Axel Hellinger, Boris Povod, Crypti, Ether, Ethereum, ICO, Joel Fernández, Joel O. Fernández, Kanzlei Hellinger, Lisk, Max Kordek, Olivier Beddows, Sidechain, Smart Contracts, XCR
Lisk
Es gibt Neuigkeiten bei Lisk: Es gibt jetzt ein konkretes Release-Datum. Lisk wird am 24. Mai erscheinen. Das ist eine erneute Verzögerung um vier Wochen. Laut dem Blog von Lisk gibt es dafür mehrere Gründe. Zunächst einmal hatte sich das Netzwerk beim Testen als nicht stabil erwiesen, so das sein Transaktionslimit von 10 pro Block notwendig wurde. Dies wurde von CEO Max und Chef-Entwickler Oli als nicht effektiv angesehen, so dass Oli umfangreiche Änderungen im Code vornahm. So wurde die Blockchain-Database von SQLite zu PostgreSQL umgecoded. Zudem gab es umfangreiche Optimierungen bei Geschwindigkeit und Synchronisation. Max und Oli sind mit dem Ergebnis sehr zufrieden. Lisk sei dadurch stabiler und schneller geworden. Im Endeffekt ist Lisk jetzt die vielen Kinderkrankheiten von Crypti losgeworden, welche das Projekt seit 2014 begleitet hatten.
Fazit: Ich bin weiterhin der Meinung, dass Verzögerungen bis zu einem gewissen Grad ICO-Investoren helfen, da dadurch der Bekanntheitsgrad erhöht wird und es mehr interessierte Nutzer gibt, welche gerne investiert hätten aber nicht mehr zum Zuge gekommen sind. So wären Kursgewinne bei Lisk unmittelbar nach dem ICO wohl sehr dünn ausgefallen – das gilt übrigens auch für IOTA. Das dadurch auch eine weitere Optimierung von Lisk eingetreten ist, kann nur helfen. Lisk Investoren sollten sich also über die erneute Verzögerung nicht ärgern. Die Informationspolitik von Max, Oli und Joel ist vorbildlich und sucht bei Kryptos ihresgleichen. Ich lege mich jetzt schon fest und erwarte eine Marktkapitalisierung von über 10 Millionen Dollar von Lisk zum Start – sofern alles glattläuft.
Disclaimer – Hinweis auf Interessenskonflikt: Der Autor ist selbst in Lisk investiert.
https://altcoinspekulant.wordpress.com/
April 25, 2016, 04:04:11 PM
As the test net was set up for lisk and hundreds of potential delegates started running nodes, sending transactions, testing stuff, it turned out that the current code can't handle the amount of transactions Lisk can expect after launch, not even with the optimalization and bug fixes Oliver made to the original crypti code since the fork.
so let me get this straight you invested $5.9million into a coin that was broken lol
yeah, I'm feeling dumb too now :/
We invested $5.9M into this ... really frightening to say the least
how much of that 5.9 mil did you invest? $100? You should be scared.
10 BTC (this is 98% of my btc holdings).
why is that even important to you? regardless of how much is invested,
we invested 'into a coin that was broken lol'
of course I did not know I am investing in something that is broken at the time (or still).
This is not funny and very frightening in my opinion
April 25, 2016, 03:59:47 PM
one question, where the hell is the dev/are the devs with some answers? if i were an investor i wouldn't give two shits what all you "supporters" think (how do we know you aren't just shills??). the dev INFO to his community and "investors" (or in this case "donators" lulz) is what matters. assuming they are legit. with all the btc capital raised hopefully lisk (and even waves) come thru nicely in the end.
+1000
I am with you on this !
where the hell is the dev/are the devs with some answers? Its the minimum they can do, to face us here because we feel really let down!
April 25, 2016, 03:58:30 PM
one question, where the hell is the dev/are the devs with some answers?
what are the questions? April 25, 2016, 03:56:53 PM
yeah, I'm feeling dumb too now :/
We invested $5.9M into this ... really frightening to say the least
Much more was invested into much less on countless times in history. We invested $5.9M into this ... really frightening to say the least
Crypti code is solid, writing something like this would take at least a year. Its much quicker to improve upon it. The code is much better already after a few weeks and database change will be a major improvement, with various others coming. After the launch with more developers progress will be even faster.
This is the difference between a clone and a fork. Clone takes no time, but its basically worthless, a fork is thriving for something better.
Software development takes time. If they wouldve just cloned crypti and released it it couldve been out the day after the ICO ended.
Lets have some patients, we all be better off for it.
I'd prefer to wait a month and have a better product than have it launched now unpolished.. if i only had participated in the ICO
April 25, 2016, 03:56:40 PM
one question, where the hell is the dev/are the devs with some answers? if i were an investor i wouldn't give two shits what all you "supporters" think (how do we know you aren't just shills??). the dev INFO to his community and "investors" (or in this case "donators" lulz) is what matters. assuming they are legit. with all the btc capital raised hopefully lisk (and even waves) come thru nicely in the end.
Jump to: