I am working with Urban Agriculture & IT experts, using forging rewards to explore Lisk DAPP creation & IoT hardware, a la Slock.it business model.
We aspire to launch an IoT intelligence platform for indoor/urban farms learning from startups & venture-backed companies such as Agrilyst, Edenworks, Farm One et al.
* Google Analytics For Greenhouses
* Indoor Farm Platform takes TechCrunch Disrupt Cup
* Sensor Enhanced Open Source Beehives
* A Massive Aquaponic Lettuce And Fish Farm Will Grow In Brooklyn
Please vote for our server, delegate DAO #18 https://forum.lisk.io/posting.php?mode=edit&f=6&p=1633
Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 1764. (Read 3074324 times)
April 10, 2016, 01:52:56 PM
April 10, 2016, 01:46:15 PM
It looks like LISK (IOU) price is gradually declining, although it could be a general thing currently in the market. It is a pity about the IOU because the IOU might just have taken the steam of the initial rise and decline usually seen with new coins. There is normally a quick rise and decline and then the price settles and then enters the development phase and is dependent on the development work. If development work is poor the price goes down further and if the development work is good then price will rise again. What is clear is that the IOU portion of the LISK money supply is insignificant to the total money supply and should not necessarily be seen as indicative of the price of the main supply of the real coin. This is because a small supply is very much sensitive to price movements especially in an environment where a lot of hype was created and people are impatient with anticipation. The real price could be much higher or much lower.
The next thing that will impact LISK is what will happen on launch day. If a significant portion of the 100m finds it way to the market without the corresponding demand the price will go down. If there is enough demand the ICO investors will exit at a profit and the new investors (and/or whales) will take over at the new floor and do their thing. Most people have a short term profit objective without necessarily worrying too much about what a coin is about as long as whatever the dev team and community does enhances the chances of their objective being met. The chances are therefore higher that a significant portion of the supply will go to market relatively quickly after launch because most holders with a short term profit objective will want to execute their strategy as quickly as possible at maximum profit. The ICO investor mix plays an important part. If the ICO mix were more big investors caring about the coin and future potential less coins will hit the market early on. If the mix were more day traders that would do anything to make a bitcoin or 2 they will exit as soon as they can make that 1 bitcoin and they will jump with joy. Chances are higher though based on statistics that the latter option is the case but not necessarily.
LISK holders must just hope that the wind was not taken out of its sails with the IOU thing and momentum negatively impacted so that that is not seen as the initial rise and decline of the coin. I hope for everyone that there will still be another one after the coin launches for real. However, imo, holding should be more long term for LISK and I hope there are many people with a long term objective in the ICO investor mix.
The next thing that will impact LISK is what will happen on launch day. If a significant portion of the 100m finds it way to the market without the corresponding demand the price will go down. If there is enough demand the ICO investors will exit at a profit and the new investors (and/or whales) will take over at the new floor and do their thing. Most people have a short term profit objective without necessarily worrying too much about what a coin is about as long as whatever the dev team and community does enhances the chances of their objective being met. The chances are therefore higher that a significant portion of the supply will go to market relatively quickly after launch because most holders with a short term profit objective will want to execute their strategy as quickly as possible at maximum profit. The ICO investor mix plays an important part. If the ICO mix were more big investors caring about the coin and future potential less coins will hit the market early on. If the mix were more day traders that would do anything to make a bitcoin or 2 they will exit as soon as they can make that 1 bitcoin and they will jump with joy. Chances are higher though based on statistics that the latter option is the case but not necessarily.
LISK holders must just hope that the wind was not taken out of its sails with the IOU thing and momentum negatively impacted so that that is not seen as the initial rise and decline of the coin. I hope for everyone that there will still be another one after the coin launches for real. However, imo, holding should be more long term for LISK and I hope there are many people with a long term objective in the ICO investor mix.
as i said elsewhere, wallet would better be launched as soon as ICO distribution is done. what is happening in cases like iota or lisk is: distribution ... hype gap ... ... eventually, wallet launch.
notice how the IOUs are being negotiated at iota, similarly (and, whenever I complain about it at iota's thread, my posts get deleted)
yobit's move was very smart, even though it's not at all good from the ICO buyer's perspective. (lisk and iota holder here)
Just take look here:
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/views/all/#BTC
All major altcoins going to minus red.
The reason is simple..... LISK
except that lisk is -43.34 % there, right now...That's hilarious. Alts aren't going down because of Lisk lol I'm an ICO holder, but come on give me a break haha And to the original poster... As I said a few pages back, if only there weren't so many retards in crypto who can't understand directions, tomorrow would be the mainnet launch. Now, the coin launch will be completely deflated because we have to wait 3 more weeks. By then, IOU price will be down 90%, and launch will be a non event.
Still trading at 012 on yobit and 008 on bloom. Demand is still there. But I don't know if we'll survive three weeks of delays, FUD, and market volatility.
April 10, 2016, 01:43:01 PM
Even if the lisk iou on yobit reaches 0.0001 btc per Lisk, i am not selling my lisk below 5 dollar. Instead i will buy a lot of more!!
April 10, 2016, 01:34:38 PM
It looks like LISK (IOU) price is gradually declining, although it could be a general thing currently in the market. It is a pity about the IOU because the IOU might just have taken the steam of the initial rise and decline usually seen with new coins. There is normally a quick rise and decline and then the price settles and then enters the development phase and is dependent on the development work. If development work is poor the price goes down further and if the development work is good then price will rise again. What is clear is that the IOU portion of the LISK money supply is insignificant to the total money supply and should not necessarily be seen as indicative of the price of the main supply of the real coin. This is because a small supply is very much sensitive to price movements especially in an environment where a lot of hype was created and people are impatient with anticipation. The real price could be much higher or much lower.
The next thing that will impact LISK is what will happen on launch day. If a significant portion of the 100m finds it way to the market without the corresponding demand the price will go down. If there is enough demand the ICO investors will exit at a profit and the new investors (and/or whales) will take over at the new floor and do their thing. Most people have a short term profit objective without necessarily worrying too much about what a coin is about as long as whatever the dev team and community does enhances the chances of their objective being met. The chances are therefore higher that a significant portion of the supply will go to market relatively quickly after launch because most holders with a short term profit objective will want to execute their strategy as quickly as possible at maximum profit. The ICO investor mix plays an important part. If the ICO mix were more big investors caring about the coin and future potential less coins will hit the market early on. If the mix were more day traders that would do anything to make a bitcoin or 2 they will exit as soon as they can make that 1 bitcoin and they will jump with joy. Chances are higher though based on statistics that the latter option is the case but not necessarily.
LISK holders must just hope that the wind was not taken out of its sails with the IOU thing and momentum negatively impacted so that that is not seen as the initial rise and decline of the coin. I hope for everyone that there will still be another one after the coin launches for real. However, imo, holding should be more long term for LISK and I hope there are many people with a long term objective in the ICO investor mix.
The next thing that will impact LISK is what will happen on launch day. If a significant portion of the 100m finds it way to the market without the corresponding demand the price will go down. If there is enough demand the ICO investors will exit at a profit and the new investors (and/or whales) will take over at the new floor and do their thing. Most people have a short term profit objective without necessarily worrying too much about what a coin is about as long as whatever the dev team and community does enhances the chances of their objective being met. The chances are therefore higher that a significant portion of the supply will go to market relatively quickly after launch because most holders with a short term profit objective will want to execute their strategy as quickly as possible at maximum profit. The ICO investor mix plays an important part. If the ICO mix were more big investors caring about the coin and future potential less coins will hit the market early on. If the mix were more day traders that would do anything to make a bitcoin or 2 they will exit as soon as they can make that 1 bitcoin and they will jump with joy. Chances are higher though based on statistics that the latter option is the case but not necessarily.
LISK holders must just hope that the wind was not taken out of its sails with the IOU thing and momentum negatively impacted so that that is not seen as the initial rise and decline of the coin. I hope for everyone that there will still be another one after the coin launches for real. However, imo, holding should be more long term for LISK and I hope there are many people with a long term objective in the ICO investor mix.
as i said elsewhere, wallet would better be launched as soon as ICO distribution is done. what is happening in cases like iota or lisk is: distribution ... hype gap ... ... eventually, wallet launch.
notice how the IOUs are being negotiated at iota, similarly (and, whenever I complain about it at iota's thread, my posts get deleted)
yobit's move was very smart, even though it's not at all good from the ICO buyer's perspective. (lisk and iota holder here)
Just take look here:
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/views/all/#BTC
All major altcoins going to minus red.
The reason is simple..... LISK
except that lisk is -43.34 % there, right now...That's hilarious. Alts aren't going down because of Lisk lol I'm an ICO holder, but come on give me a break haha And to the original poster... As I said a few pages back, if only there weren't so many retards in crypto who can't understand directions, tomorrow would be the mainnet launch. Now, the coin launch will be completely deflated because we have to wait 3 more weeks. By then, IOU price will be down 90%, and launch will be a non event.
Still trading at 012 on yobit and 008 on bloom. Demand is still there. But I don't know if we'll survive three weeks of delays, FUD, and market volatility.
April 10, 2016, 01:27:30 PM
Captain Vitalik, we have a Problem!!!- - - - -> LISK!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the Ethereum Investors left ETH to invest in LISK
I think LISK will replace ETH soon
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the Ethereum Investors left ETH to invest in LISK
I think LISK will replace ETH soon
April 10, 2016, 01:26:40 PM
It looks like LISK (IOU) price is gradually declining, although it could be a general thing currently in the market. It is a pity about the IOU because the IOU might just have taken the steam of the initial rise and decline usually seen with new coins. There is normally a quick rise and decline and then the price settles and then enters the development phase and is dependent on the development work. If development work is poor the price goes down further and if the development work is good then price will rise again. What is clear is that the IOU portion of the LISK money supply is insignificant to the total money supply and should not necessarily be seen as indicative of the price of the main supply of the real coin. This is because a small supply is very much sensitive to price movements especially in an environment where a lot of hype was created and people are impatient with anticipation. The real price could be much higher or much lower.
The next thing that will impact LISK is what will happen on launch day. If a significant portion of the 100m finds it way to the market without the corresponding demand the price will go down. If there is enough demand the ICO investors will exit at a profit and the new investors (and/or whales) will take over at the new floor and do their thing. Most people have a short term profit objective without necessarily worrying too much about what a coin is about as long as whatever the dev team and community does enhances the chances of their objective being met. The chances are therefore higher that a significant portion of the supply will go to market relatively quickly after launch because most holders with a short term profit objective will want to execute their strategy as quickly as possible at maximum profit. The ICO investor mix plays an important part. If the ICO mix were more big investors caring about the coin and future potential less coins will hit the market early on. If the mix were more day traders that would do anything to make a bitcoin or 2 they will exit as soon as they can make that 1 bitcoin and they will jump with joy. Chances are higher though based on statistics that the latter option is the case but not necessarily.
LISK holders must just hope that the wind was not taken out of its sails with the IOU thing and momentum negatively impacted so that that is not seen as the initial rise and decline of the coin. I hope for everyone that there will still be another one after the coin launches for real. However, imo, holding should be more long term for LISK and I hope there are many people with a long term objective in the ICO investor mix.
The next thing that will impact LISK is what will happen on launch day. If a significant portion of the 100m finds it way to the market without the corresponding demand the price will go down. If there is enough demand the ICO investors will exit at a profit and the new investors (and/or whales) will take over at the new floor and do their thing. Most people have a short term profit objective without necessarily worrying too much about what a coin is about as long as whatever the dev team and community does enhances the chances of their objective being met. The chances are therefore higher that a significant portion of the supply will go to market relatively quickly after launch because most holders with a short term profit objective will want to execute their strategy as quickly as possible at maximum profit. The ICO investor mix plays an important part. If the ICO mix were more big investors caring about the coin and future potential less coins will hit the market early on. If the mix were more day traders that would do anything to make a bitcoin or 2 they will exit as soon as they can make that 1 bitcoin and they will jump with joy. Chances are higher though based on statistics that the latter option is the case but not necessarily.
LISK holders must just hope that the wind was not taken out of its sails with the IOU thing and momentum negatively impacted so that that is not seen as the initial rise and decline of the coin. I hope for everyone that there will still be another one after the coin launches for real. However, imo, holding should be more long term for LISK and I hope there are many people with a long term objective in the ICO investor mix.
as i said elsewhere, wallet would better be launched as soon as ICO distribution is done. what is happening in cases like iota or lisk is: distribution ... hype gap ... ... eventually, wallet launch.
notice how the IOUs are being negotiated at iota, similarly (and, whenever I complain about it at iota's thread, my posts get deleted)
yobit's move was very smart, even though it's not at all good from the ICO buyer's perspective. (lisk and iota holder here)
Just take look here:
http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/views/all/#BTC
All major altcoins going to minus red.
The reason is simple..... LISK
except that lisk is -43.34 % there, right now...That's hilarious. Alts aren't going down because of Lisk lol I'm an ICO holder, but come on give me a break haha And to the original poster... As I said a few pages back, if only there weren't so many retards in crypto who can't understand directions, tomorrow would be the mainnet launch. Now, the coin launch will be completely deflated because we have to wait 3 more weeks. By then, IOU price will be down 90%, and launch will be a non event.
April 10, 2016, 01:25:02 PM
Does anyone know if the differences between Crypti and Ethereum as described below are still accurate (except now obviously I'm referring to LISK vs. Ethereum)? Specifically, this says (at least at the time) that Ethereum did not have "an in-built frontend or hosting solution". Whereas Crypti (and I assume LISK) does. Is this correct?
https://bitscan.com/articles/crypti-dapps-without-the-dollars
Q: On the surface of it, Crypti looks a lot like Ethereum - what are the differences?
Crypti is a decentralised application platform, while Ethereum is a smart contract platform. Now, you may find yourself asking, what does this actually mean?
At Ethereum, there is absolutely no doubt, developers get access to a great decentralised backend system. However, I feel this is at the cost of not having an in-built frontend or hosting solution right from the beginning. This forces decentralised application developers to rely on existing third-party centralised solutions, which in our view is far from optimal.
With Crypti, the situation is completely different. Developers have access to a full-stack decentralised ecosystem, providing concrete solutions for the frontend, backend and storage layers of a truly decentralized application. Plus, as an added bonus, each dapp is distributed through our very own Dapp Store, where users can install and launch dapps from an easy-to-use interface.
Developing dapps for Crypti is very easy. Crypti dapps are written in JavaScript and are powered by the increasingly popular Node.js runtime - both of which could arguably be described as the most popular tools used to build applications for the web today. Coupled with our simple-to-understand software development kit (SDK), I feel Crypti is the best choice of platform for developing decentralised applications on the blockchain.
https://bitscan.com/articles/crypti-dapps-without-the-dollars
Q: On the surface of it, Crypti looks a lot like Ethereum - what are the differences?
Crypti is a decentralised application platform, while Ethereum is a smart contract platform. Now, you may find yourself asking, what does this actually mean?
At Ethereum, there is absolutely no doubt, developers get access to a great decentralised backend system. However, I feel this is at the cost of not having an in-built frontend or hosting solution right from the beginning. This forces decentralised application developers to rely on existing third-party centralised solutions, which in our view is far from optimal.
With Crypti, the situation is completely different. Developers have access to a full-stack decentralised ecosystem, providing concrete solutions for the frontend, backend and storage layers of a truly decentralized application. Plus, as an added bonus, each dapp is distributed through our very own Dapp Store, where users can install and launch dapps from an easy-to-use interface.
Developing dapps for Crypti is very easy. Crypti dapps are written in JavaScript and are powered by the increasingly popular Node.js runtime - both of which could arguably be described as the most popular tools used to build applications for the web today. Coupled with our simple-to-understand software development kit (SDK), I feel Crypti is the best choice of platform for developing decentralised applications on the blockchain.
Crypti failed that's why they are rebranding it!
lolWhy quote my question if you're not going to answer it? Ya dumb ass!
April 10, 2016, 01:17:46 PM
Does anyone know if the differences between Crypti and Ethereum as described below are still accurate (except now obviously I'm referring to LISK vs. Ethereum)? Specifically, this says (at least at the time) that Ethereum did not have "an in-built frontend or hosting solution". Whereas Crypti (and I assume LISK) does. Is this correct?
https://bitscan.com/articles/crypti-dapps-without-the-dollars
Q: On the surface of it, Crypti looks a lot like Ethereum - what are the differences?
Crypti is a decentralised application platform, while Ethereum is a smart contract platform. Now, you may find yourself asking, what does this actually mean?
At Ethereum, there is absolutely no doubt, developers get access to a great decentralised backend system. However, I feel this is at the cost of not having an in-built frontend or hosting solution right from the beginning. This forces decentralised application developers to rely on existing third-party centralised solutions, which in our view is far from optimal.
With Crypti, the situation is completely different. Developers have access to a full-stack decentralised ecosystem, providing concrete solutions for the frontend, backend and storage layers of a truly decentralized application. Plus, as an added bonus, each dapp is distributed through our very own Dapp Store, where users can install and launch dapps from an easy-to-use interface.
Developing dapps for Crypti is very easy. Crypti dapps are written in JavaScript and are powered by the increasingly popular Node.js runtime - both of which could arguably be described as the most popular tools used to build applications for the web today. Coupled with our simple-to-understand software development kit (SDK), I feel Crypti is the best choice of platform for developing decentralised applications on the blockchain.
https://bitscan.com/articles/crypti-dapps-without-the-dollars
Q: On the surface of it, Crypti looks a lot like Ethereum - what are the differences?
Crypti is a decentralised application platform, while Ethereum is a smart contract platform. Now, you may find yourself asking, what does this actually mean?
At Ethereum, there is absolutely no doubt, developers get access to a great decentralised backend system. However, I feel this is at the cost of not having an in-built frontend or hosting solution right from the beginning. This forces decentralised application developers to rely on existing third-party centralised solutions, which in our view is far from optimal.
With Crypti, the situation is completely different. Developers have access to a full-stack decentralised ecosystem, providing concrete solutions for the frontend, backend and storage layers of a truly decentralized application. Plus, as an added bonus, each dapp is distributed through our very own Dapp Store, where users can install and launch dapps from an easy-to-use interface.
Developing dapps for Crypti is very easy. Crypti dapps are written in JavaScript and are powered by the increasingly popular Node.js runtime - both of which could arguably be described as the most popular tools used to build applications for the web today. Coupled with our simple-to-understand software development kit (SDK), I feel Crypti is the best choice of platform for developing decentralised applications on the blockchain.
Crypti failed that's why they are rebranding it!
lol
April 10, 2016, 01:14:16 PM
Does anyone know if the differences between Crypti and Ethereum as described below are still accurate (except now obviously I'm referring to LISK vs. Ethereum)? Specifically, this says (at least at the time) that Ethereum did not have "an in-built frontend or hosting solution". Whereas Crypti (and I assume LISK) does. Is this correct?
https://bitscan.com/articles/crypti-dapps-without-the-dollars
Q: On the surface of it, Crypti looks a lot like Ethereum - what are the differences?
Crypti is a decentralised application platform, while Ethereum is a smart contract platform. Now, you may find yourself asking, what does this actually mean?
At Ethereum, there is absolutely no doubt, developers get access to a great decentralised backend system. However, I feel this is at the cost of not having an in-built frontend or hosting solution right from the beginning. This forces decentralised application developers to rely on existing third-party centralised solutions, which in our view is far from optimal.
With Crypti, the situation is completely different. Developers have access to a full-stack decentralised ecosystem, providing concrete solutions for the frontend, backend and storage layers of a truly decentralized application. Plus, as an added bonus, each dapp is distributed through our very own Dapp Store, where users can install and launch dapps from an easy-to-use interface.
Developing dapps for Crypti is very easy. Crypti dapps are written in JavaScript and are powered by the increasingly popular Node.js runtime - both of which could arguably be described as the most popular tools used to build applications for the web today. Coupled with our simple-to-understand software development kit (SDK), I feel Crypti is the best choice of platform for developing decentralised applications on the blockchain.
https://bitscan.com/articles/crypti-dapps-without-the-dollars
Q: On the surface of it, Crypti looks a lot like Ethereum - what are the differences?
Crypti is a decentralised application platform, while Ethereum is a smart contract platform. Now, you may find yourself asking, what does this actually mean?
At Ethereum, there is absolutely no doubt, developers get access to a great decentralised backend system. However, I feel this is at the cost of not having an in-built frontend or hosting solution right from the beginning. This forces decentralised application developers to rely on existing third-party centralised solutions, which in our view is far from optimal.
With Crypti, the situation is completely different. Developers have access to a full-stack decentralised ecosystem, providing concrete solutions for the frontend, backend and storage layers of a truly decentralized application. Plus, as an added bonus, each dapp is distributed through our very own Dapp Store, where users can install and launch dapps from an easy-to-use interface.
Developing dapps for Crypti is very easy. Crypti dapps are written in JavaScript and are powered by the increasingly popular Node.js runtime - both of which could arguably be described as the most popular tools used to build applications for the web today. Coupled with our simple-to-understand software development kit (SDK), I feel Crypti is the best choice of platform for developing decentralised applications on the blockchain.
Crypti failed that's why they are rebranding it!
lol April 10, 2016, 01:08:51 PM
Does anyone know if the differences between Crypti and Ethereum as described below are still accurate (except now obviously I'm referring to LISK vs. Ethereum)? Specifically, this says (at least at the time) that Ethereum did not have "an in-built frontend or hosting solution". Whereas Crypti (and I assume LISK) does. Is this correct?
https://bitscan.com/articles/crypti-dapps-without-the-dollars
Q: On the surface of it, Crypti looks a lot like Ethereum - what are the differences?
Crypti is a decentralised application platform, while Ethereum is a smart contract platform. Now, you may find yourself asking, what does this actually mean?
At Ethereum, there is absolutely no doubt, developers get access to a great decentralised backend system. However, I feel this is at the cost of not having an in-built frontend or hosting solution right from the beginning. This forces decentralised application developers to rely on existing third-party centralised solutions, which in our view is far from optimal.
With Crypti, the situation is completely different. Developers have access to a full-stack decentralised ecosystem, providing concrete solutions for the frontend, backend and storage layers of a truly decentralized application. Plus, as an added bonus, each dapp is distributed through our very own Dapp Store, where users can install and launch dapps from an easy-to-use interface.
Developing dapps for Crypti is very easy. Crypti dapps are written in JavaScript and are powered by the increasingly popular Node.js runtime - both of which could arguably be described as the most popular tools used to build applications for the web today. Coupled with our simple-to-understand software development kit (SDK), I feel Crypti is the best choice of platform for developing decentralised applications on the blockchain.
https://bitscan.com/articles/crypti-dapps-without-the-dollars
Q: On the surface of it, Crypti looks a lot like Ethereum - what are the differences?
Crypti is a decentralised application platform, while Ethereum is a smart contract platform. Now, you may find yourself asking, what does this actually mean?
At Ethereum, there is absolutely no doubt, developers get access to a great decentralised backend system. However, I feel this is at the cost of not having an in-built frontend or hosting solution right from the beginning. This forces decentralised application developers to rely on existing third-party centralised solutions, which in our view is far from optimal.
With Crypti, the situation is completely different. Developers have access to a full-stack decentralised ecosystem, providing concrete solutions for the frontend, backend and storage layers of a truly decentralized application. Plus, as an added bonus, each dapp is distributed through our very own Dapp Store, where users can install and launch dapps from an easy-to-use interface.
Developing dapps for Crypti is very easy. Crypti dapps are written in JavaScript and are powered by the increasingly popular Node.js runtime - both of which could arguably be described as the most popular tools used to build applications for the web today. Coupled with our simple-to-understand software development kit (SDK), I feel Crypti is the best choice of platform for developing decentralised applications on the blockchain.
April 10, 2016, 01:01:15 PM
April 10, 2016, 12:59:13 PM
Woow
Vitalik assumed that LISK WILL KILL ETHEREUM!!
News worthy I'd say. I think I heard CNN talking about this one.
no, nothing right now. Just waiting for the bottom.
April 10, 2016, 12:58:15 PM
Woow
Vitalik assumed that LISK WILL KILL ETHEREUM!!
News worthy I'd say. I think I heard CNN talking about this one.
Im very happy!
He is very smart and if he is working now for LISK only good things can happen!!
Yeah
April 10, 2016, 12:57:31 PM
Woow
Vitalik assumed that LISK WILL KILL ETHEREUM!!
News worthy I'd say. I think I heard CNN talking about this one.
April 10, 2016, 12:55:41 PM
Woow
Vitalik assumed that LISK WILL KILL ETHEREUM!!
News worthy I'd say. I think I heard CNN talking about this one.
April 10, 2016, 12:49:54 PM
Woow
Vitalik assumed that LISK WILL KILL ETHEREUM!!
April 10, 2016, 12:32:19 PM
Please stop posting fake statements like this. It's not polite.
it's just a joke. Not everything has to be serious in life. Sorry you buy at the top of ETH?
It's just words with a quote around it, it doesn't even have his name on it lol.
Get a sense of humor.
No I didnt buy on top and my own investments have nothing to do with my comment about you posting such pics.
Most probably we have very different sense of humor.
guessing you have none
April 10, 2016, 12:31:54 PM
Please stop posting fake statements like this. It's not polite.
it's just a joke. Not everything has to be serious in life. Sorry you buy at the top of ETH?
It's just words with a quote around it, it doesn't even have his name on it lol.
Get a sense of humor.
No I didnt buy on top and my own investments have nothing to do with my comment about you posting such pics.
Most probably we have very different sense of humor.
April 10, 2016, 12:30:27 PM
you lose too much on eth?
it makes fun of the whole crypto community.
April 10, 2016, 12:29:09 PM
"Please don't buy any LISK in this forum. The owner can reset the passphrases by simply open a ticket on our support center and provide us with his email address and exchange ID. We check the data and if all is good, we will reset the passphrases."
Someone offered to sell me LISK. Does the above (from the OP) mean if I buy them he can reset the passphrase and then I won't have them? Is there a way to buy LISK from someone yet?
Someone offered to sell me LISK. Does the above (from the OP) mean if I buy them he can reset the passphrase and then I won't have them? Is there a way to buy LISK from someone yet?
How much 1 lisk today?
Given this high volatility, better check in real time:
https://yobit.net/en/trade/LISK/BTC
If it is possible to trade there or this is just a joke?
Official Statement regarding YoBit trading “IOU” LISK tokens
https://blog.lisk.io/official-statement-on-yobit-lisk-iou-token-trading-cca8e7e52a72#.cultr8yxa
Jump to: