Wonder how all of you feel about azure taking away rights from bloackchain devs:
http://bitcoinist.net/microsoft-bullies-open-source-is-the-blockchain-their-next-target/
NEM decided not to do it and not to sell out:
http://blog.nem.io/status-on-the-azure-project/
Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 1927. (Read 3074324 times)
March 29, 2016, 08:01:20 AM
March 29, 2016, 07:59:34 AM
11th April here we come 
250k satosh
250k satoshEverything below would be a waste to sell really, it can get 1/10th of ethereum there cap.
March 29, 2016, 07:52:08 AM
11th April here we come 250k satosh
250k satosh 
March 29, 2016, 07:39:38 AM
Hey been out sick for past few days so I have missed a lot. So, validating the passphrase is just a step to make sure we have the correct ones saved?
Exactly. The validation is not mandatory but recommended.
Trying to look back over the tons of the comments. Does anyone know if April 11th is still the rough estimate for launching LISK on the exchanges?
Yes it is at least right now. Devs can come up with a fixed or delayed date anytime.
March 29, 2016, 07:23:45 AM
Hey been out sick for past few days so I have missed a lot. So, validating the passphrase is just a step to make sure we have the correct ones saved?
Exactly. The validation is not mandatory but recommended.
Trying to look back over the tons of the comments. Does anyone know if April 11th is still the rough estimate for launching LISK on the exchanges?
March 29, 2016, 07:10:29 AM
So... 150k SAT at opening?
yes, it's truehttps://twitter.com/FastCryptoTrade/status/711807227015913472
That Twitter account managed to be wrong on all its previous predictions.
Its not easy to fail them all, even a broken clock gives the right time 2x/day.
Now would be a good time to be right though.
it's lie, not all predictions was execute, but I can x1.74 my deposit for this prognosis
March 29, 2016, 06:51:46 AM
Hey been out sick for past few days so I have missed a lot. So, validating the passphrase is just a step to make sure we have the correct ones saved?
Exactly. The validation is not mandatory but recommended.
March 29, 2016, 06:39:06 AM
Hey been out sick for past few days so I have missed a lot. So, validating the passphrase is just a step to make sure we have the correct ones saved?
March 29, 2016, 06:23:18 AM
Since i had a hard time finding it myself and I think it isn't really mentioned anywhere, here is the Link to the login-page where you can GENERATE YOUR KEYS:
https://ico.lisk.io/users/sign_in
https://ico.lisk.io/users/sign_in
I hope our guide clears it up more.
I will update the OP later today. https://medium.com/lisk-academy/lisk-guide-to-verifying-your-ico-generated-keys-c11a5df1089f
Hi guys.
You must have a minimum server configuration to be a delegate?.
Thanks in advance.
You must have a minimum server configuration to be a delegate?.
Thanks in advance.
Normal VPS, 1GB RAM is good.
Do i have to validate my keys?
I generated and backed them up before the ico ended. Now i need to validate?
I generated and backed them up before the ico ended. Now i need to validate?
We urgently heavily recommended to validate them. Else you might have saved the wrong passphrase.
Guide for Verifying your Keys
We are encouraging everyone to validate their keys, so I have created a very simple guide you can follow for verifying the keys.
By validating your passphrases you will contribute in making the launch of Lisk smoother.
We suggest everyone to verify their generated keys, the more we have verified, the better.
Thanks!
Joel
We are encouraging everyone to validate their keys, so I have created a very simple guide you can follow for verifying the keys.
By validating your passphrases you will contribute in making the launch of Lisk smoother.
We suggest everyone to verify their generated keys, the more we have verified, the better.
Thanks!
Joel
What happens if we don't? I'm comfortable with my keys stored offline.
You might have stored the wrong keys and your LISK will be lost. You won't have a 100% guarantee.
March 29, 2016, 05:55:38 AM
Validated both of my keys successfully. Thanks
Guide for Verifying your Keys
We are encouraging everyone to validate their keys, so I have created a very simple guide you can follow for verifying the keys.
By validating your passphrases you will contribute in making the launch of Lisk smoother.
We suggest everyone to verify their generated keys, the more we have verified, the better.
Thanks!
Joel
We are encouraging everyone to validate their keys, so I have created a very simple guide you can follow for verifying the keys.
By validating your passphrases you will contribute in making the launch of Lisk smoother.
We suggest everyone to verify their generated keys, the more we have verified, the better.
Thanks!
Joel
March 29, 2016, 05:46:20 AM
Hi guys.
You must have a minimum server configuration to be a delegate?.
Thanks in advance.
You must have a minimum server configuration to be a delegate?.
Thanks in advance.
March 29, 2016, 05:23:59 AM
So... 150k SAT at opening?
yes, it's truehttps://twitter.com/FastCryptoTrade/status/711807227015913472
That Twitter account managed to be wrong on all its previous predictions.
Its not easy to fail them all, even a broken clock gives the right time 2x/day.
Now would be a good time to be right though.
March 29, 2016, 05:21:50 AM
@Wolf Rainer @paett, send message to support as @Grumlin says: https://lisk.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
March 29, 2016, 05:17:45 AM
I have had the same problem that one key could not be validated.
It did not work when I copied the key from the txt file.
However it did work when typing it in by hand.
Have you tried that already?
Hope I could help
March 29, 2016, 05:17:03 AM
p.s. try this one, if not, see above
I have had the same problem that one key could not be validated.
It did not work when I copied the key from the txt file.
However it did work when typing it in by hand.
Have you tried that already?
Hope I could help
It did not work when I copied the key from the txt file.
However it did work when typing it in by hand.
Have you tried that already?
Hope I could help
March 29, 2016, 05:08:23 AM
What are the voting intervalls?
Voting is continuous and never stops. Anybody can be voted up or down at any time. This is why it is so important to have hot-swap Standby Delegate nodes (at zero reward) ready to go continuously to take the place of a $300K-per-year Active Delegate node that is suddenly voted down.
What could possibly go wrong?
I think, Lisk makes sense, how it is. Crypti with no forging reward was a miss-contruction.
The only point is to have alot Apps after start and getting more and more at the plattform.
March 29, 2016, 04:51:07 AM
Something to vote: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1415320
Voted. These are the results right now:
[UPDATED]
Question: Do you think that LISK is BIGGEST SCAM?
Yes -------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 (19.1%)
No -------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 (40.4%)
I am investor of Lisk, but I think that LISK is SCAM ------------ 4 (8.5%)
I am investor of Lisk and I think that LISK isn't SCAM --------- 15 (31.9%)
Seems that unanimity is the agreement that Lisk is not a scam.
March 29, 2016, 04:47:59 AM
March 29, 2016, 04:38:26 AM
Yes, I do understand all of this, but it's not really relevant to my main concern, which is about the way delegates claim their position. However, if the delegate pool was to be made substantially larger, wouldn't any centralisation claims be easier to fend off?
Here's an interesting little thing about predicting voters turnouts... at least, I find it interesting:
There is an (admittedly disputed) formulae for this:
PB + D > C,
P is the probability that an individual's vote will affect the outcome of an election,
B is the perceived benefit that would be received if that person's favored political party or candidate were elected,
D originally stood for democracy or civic duty, but today represents any social or personal gratification an individual gets from voting, and
C is the time, effort, and financial cost involved in voting.
For an average Lisk voter, we can already see that both P and B are essentially zero and I can't imagine D would be very high. C would likely be quite/very high due to the effort of reading about delegates and especially paying to vote.
Now look at it from a (selfish) large Lisk holders/group point of view:
P would be high, because a high Lisk holder or group can put a lot of Lisk into voting and quite possibly affect the outcome. B would be astronomical because he's hoping to get a delegate out of it. We'll leave D as before because we can afford to, and C would be possibly quite high due to cost, but not as high as B, because B is where the profit is.
Ah ok i see clearer now , I would have to agree to be honest , it was one of the things i was thinking about when i was reading and investing and looking at the economical incentives, a doubling of delegates would lower voting power and increase decentralization , althou i am not too certain on the negatives that could be made with such a jump in delegates, i mean financially , people are still earning a very tidy sum for running a delegate . But not sure of attack vectors or possible manipulations of the system were it to be expanded like such, there could be non lol, but could become worse off . Like possibly voting being worth even less to the smaller people would they be less inclined to actually vote. The percentage of power distribution against the loss of actual delegate voting would need to be figured out without reliable figures.
I would be interested in this being talked about more , especially if the coin grows in value very quickly , would a increase of delegates not help the system better? surely , spreading the wealth instead of accumulation from the 101. is there any plan to perhaps experiment on test net or debate about it with developers.
100% agreed. The 101 model is not scalable and does not take into account the market value of Lisk as a potential threat. Now we are talking about pools of master nodes and people still think this will be a decentralized system. Your concerns are valid and very well thought, though I don't see any Lisk dev following them up.
March 29, 2016, 04:32:49 AM
Something to vote: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1415320
Jump to: