Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 2022. (Read 3074324 times)

The first day bonus is 200,000 LISK.

The 200,000 LISK is a share of the total of 1,200,000 LISK set aside for the "Bounty Campaign".

First day bonus - 200,000 LISK
Newsletter Subscribers — 200,000 LISK
Facebook Likes — 100,000 LISK
Twitter Followers — 200,000 LISK
Signature Campaign — 200,000 LISK
Translations — 300,000 LISK

Is there a single person from the now massive Lisk community of bagholders that can respond to the below statements?

From the post:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethtrader/comments/4af4ni/ethereums_advantages_for_bitcoin_highlight_how/


What About Lisk?
It's basically trying to be Ethereum, but using javascript (rather than Ethereum's clients which make a hell of a lot more sense, such as Go, C++, Python, Rust, Java, Ruby, .net). A Javascript Ethereum is a terrible idea, and even if it wasn't, why devote a whole new blockchain to it. Seems pointless, leading to some to suggest this may be an elaborate scam. I doubt it's a scam, but it does seem poorly thought out.
As noted by /u/Itsaconspiracy and /u/Nevermindthequestion :
The javascript is sandboxed but unrestricted. They have half a dozen rules you're supposed to follow in contracts, to avoid breaking consensus. Nothing's stopping you from putting a call to math.random() in your contract and then nobody gets the same results. Every contract runs in its own sidechain so at least you're not breaking global consensus, but contracts can call each other so it's not totally isolates easier for bugs to sneak in. For example, if someone passes the string "1" into a parameter where you're expectd either.
Javascript numbers are all floating-point, so you can get rounding errors in your contracts. (It's possible that they provide a bignum library, but I don't think so, their rules for contract writers don't say "please use our bignum library.")
Javascript has weak dynamic typing, so it'ing a number, and you haven't written explicit code to convert it to a number, then you can end up with the wrong answer. ("1" + 2) / 3 = 4 in Javascript. (Try it yourself online).
Not to mention that the LISK contracts will be stored in plaintext, which means they'll be vastly more expensive to publish.
OK, so Bitcoin focused smart contracts and LISK are bad ideas, but sometimes bad ideas win, after all, bla bla "network effect"

WTS ~2800 LISK, .001 / LISK. Will definitely accept counter offers

PM me if you'd like more info. Escrow will be used, I will pay for the fees associated with such a trade

WTS 1000 LISK for 2,4 BTC - you can buy up to 18850 LISK. Using escrow!

Pm if you are interested!

Correction, but the first day bonus is 1,000,000 Lisks for which Dev added an extra 200,000 to it making the total 1,200,000 and as far as I am concerned there were 790 BTC's invested on the first day, so 1,200,000 / 790 = 1518.987341772152 per BTC invested. 

the 790 BTC figure might not be entirely correct, I remember seeing 790 BTC when the 1st day was over, and then someone else mentioning 801 BTC a few days later making 801 BTC the worst case scenario which would be 1,200,000 Lisks / 801 BTC = 1,498.12734082397 Lisks per 1 BTC ɪ̶̷̲̅ɴ̶̷̲̅ᴠ̶̷̲̅ᴇ̶̷̲̅s̶̷̲̅ᴛ̶̷̲̅ᴇ̶̷̲̅ᴅ̶̷̲̅ donated

I would have invested yesterday but I saw some anomalies. Taking a look at ther son ticker, I discovered that the invested BTC amount increases permanently without the number of participants or exchanges changing at all.

I have observed this pattern multiple times and to me it looked like a flawed BTC counter just counting up randomly forgetting to adjust the other values.
Just my feeling, so I stayed away. I hope I was just wrong.

https://i.imgur.com/UFsqD0J.png

https://i.imgur.com/Dmjlezt.png

https://i.imgur.com/WDex04p.png

BTER  coins to the fire!

For that we need to know how much BTC came in between 22 Feb 2016 05:52 UTC and 23 Feb 2016 05:51 UTC.

Let's assume 200BTC, then your first day bonus would be YOUR CONTRIBUTION * 200000 / 200

So if 200BTC total came in, and you contributed 1BTC, you would get 1000 LISK.

Coming soon,

Local List Coins  http://LocalLiskCoins.com

Escrow Trading of Lisk for BTC to accommodate so much demand for pre-exchange release of LISK.

sale is over now, there can't be much change now any more...

WTS 1000 LISK for 2,5 BTC - you can buy up to 72000 LISK.

send me a pm if you are interested!

well i think current estimate will go up, because imho LISKHQ will suspend payment from bter...

Wtf if an ico ends it means the coins should be stable NOT DECLINING any further ..  

WTS some LISK:

a) 1314 LISK* for 4,5 BTC

b) 2247 LISK* for 7,7 BTC

*current estimate
if number of LISK will be biger than a estimate it is my present for you, if it will be smaller, escrow will
return the overpayment to you (proportionally).
I will pay escorw fee

**please see why i have negative trust (some problems with member - KWH we honored each other )

Time to post this again.

the wrote that they will contact you directly. i think they will ask for your address. and then send the coins.

How can I claim my social media rewards?

There's over 1000+ account that have not created their keys.

what do you mean created their key and pass? we have those from the website already, we need to do soemthing else with those key and pass that i'm not aware of?

19 % Blockchain is loading...  it's very long !