Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers - page 2106. (Read 3074324 times)

ideally the corporate and legal identity and structure and status ought to be in place and published before an ICO goes ahead. thanks for replying.  

Register it where>? In what country?

do it when you have in same time opened crypty wallet and lisk ico site

Yes, I just got my office 2 weeks ago and the domain was registered in January. As you can see above there are always some people who just want to damage good effort, and who knows what they might do in the future. Therefore, we hid our private addresses in the domain.

We are in the process to incorporate Lisk as a non-profit company (fingers crossed it will be acknowledged). As soon as this is done we will insert the correct address in the domain registrar.

i didn't follow too much this good project, but how much bitcoin has been rised since now? can we assume a 10k satoshi before the end of the ico as a final value?

the incorporated entity identity and its postal address should be published. that would not weaken protection against spam, phishing, et.c. it's an act of good faith.

the whole ICO process needs to be a little more transparent. not just for Lisk, but for any and all new coins. some basic protocols would help to separate the good from the not so good actors in the space.

I did read up as you said.

Thanks for pointing me to page 11/12, indeed a good read up.

The only thing I want is that this platform goes live and it works properly, without all the drama.

The XCR guys have a perfect opportunity to get into Lisk so they shouldnt be complaining either.

I think Namecheap has a free whois protection service. If I register a domain, I also take advantage of it. At least it protects against spam, fraudster, phishing, etc. I don't see where the problem is.

like PRISM, this coin's website domain name registrant is hidden behind WHOISGUARD INC. in Panama.
Why the need to do this?
 
Information
Domain Handle :   DOM-360701
Domain Name :   lisk.io ... (Check lisk.ac) ... (Check lisk.sh)
Domain Status :   Live
First Registered :   2016-01-07
Last Updated :   2016-01-07
Expiry :   2017-01-07 ... Redemption Grace Period Ends, 2017-04-08 00:30
Back-order :   Available ... Purchase a Back-Order ... (What is a back-order?)
Domain Owner
User ID :   NIC-1059419
Contact Name :   WhoisGuard Protected
Organization Name :   WhoisGuard, Inc.
Street :   P.O. Box 0823-03411
City :   Panama
State :   Panama
Postal Code :   00000
Country:   PA
Admin Contact
User ID :   NIC-1059417
Contact Name :   WhoisGuard Protected
Organization Name :   WhoisGuard, Inc.
Street :   P.O. Box 0823-03411
City :   Panama
State :   Panama
Postal Code :   00000
Country:   PA
Technical Contact
User ID :   NIC-1059420
Contact Name :   WhoisGuard Protected
Organization Name :   WhoisGuard, Inc.
Street :   P.O. Box 0823-03411
City :   Panama
State :   Panama
Postal Code :   00000
Country:   PA
Billing Contact
User ID :   NIC-1059418
Contact Name :   WhoisGuard Protected
Organization Name :   WhoisGuard, Inc.
Street :   P.O. Box 0823-03411
City :   Panama
State :   Panama
Postal Code :   00000
Country:   PA
Registrar
User ID :   NIC-1205
Organization Name :   Namecheap, Inc
Street :   11400 W Olympic Blvd, Suite 200
City :   Los Angeles
State :   CA
Postal Code :   90064
Country:   US
Primary Nameserver
Name Server:   dns1.registrar-servers.com
Name Server:   dns2.registrar-servers.com
Name Server:   dns3.registrar-servers.com
Name Server:   dns4.registrar-servers.com
Name Server:   dns5.registrar-servers.com

I wasn't talking about you, but the original poster of the quote. I named him.
And you shouldn't read all the thread, but I don't think it's that much to ask to read a page or two before and after a linked post that you are asking about.

It is nescessary, and you dont expect me to read +100 pages.

Stuff like this can happen and could easily be posted somehwere more easier to be found.

And im not provoking I want to know what happens when I invest money into something.

Strange...

Maybe send a PM to LiskHQ or contact support on lisk.io

Still have 5 days so no problem.

i do but have the same error

Fill in a Crypti wallet address, not the address on the exchange.

Im trying to do a exchange in the IPO with CRYPTI and It has an error

1 error prohibited your exchange from being started:

Return address is not a valid Crypti address

And the Crypti address is correct

They don't respond, because it's unnecessary. It's a quote from page 11, so it's a reasonable assumption that anyone who quotes it has read the few previous and next pages around that, so they are just provoking (telling username,  LISKisSCAM).
Why should they respond every time when someone brings it up again and again? It was answered, responded to and their position cleared way back then. Anyone interested should go back and read what happened. Don't just read the linked post but the whole conversation.

Im all against FUD but I know Litoshi was close with the XCR team.

If this is false true or whatever I do like to hear an explanation about this from the Lisk team.

Why would someone create bad services one by another? Vultr virtual server only costs $5 a month. It's simply easier to provide a stable service.

But don't forget, that until he fails he can offer this sharing. So he has until this case this advantage to more stable delegates. And after his fail, he just start the service with a new name and again offer a nice share. For me risk and reward are not balanced.

I see your logic. But on the other hand if a delegate fail to create a block he won't receive 5 Lisk and won't have anything to share with his voters. So it would only make sense to vote for stable delegates with 90-100% uptime.