Magnet is PoS/PoW mining with a 1 in 2 chance occurrence of either. So masternodes receiving 50% of mining rewards also have a 1 in 2 chance of receiving either a PoS or a PoW reward.
PoW = 200 Mag so masternodes receive 100 Mag when they win PoW.
PoS = coin-day * 7% / 365 so masternodes receive X Mag depending on the staking amount.
The screen above shows that your masternode received 5 rewards. 4 of which are PoS and one is PoW. Now this is like flipping a coin, eventually you will end up with around 50% PoS and 50% PoW.
One more important thing, verify that you have disabled staking (staking=0) in your configuration file as this could potentially reset your rank and you would lose a chance at an actual PoW reward whenever your coin stake wins the block. PoS rewards are typically small as the network supply is still small too but we can easily see a day where staking rewards will outperform PoW rewards.
mnrank.com shows wrong data for Magnet. The reward is much lower (about half of what is listed there).
No wonder why the MAG price is sinking..
As I told you many times on Slack, we are not controlling what MNRANK shows on their website. Stop spreading lies about us, again we are not controlling what MNRANK decides to display.
I wrote the listing script here
http://magnetwork.io/checkmn and I made sure that the calculation displays correct average - it has always done so. You just did not bother to check it yourself. Now I understand you are frustrated because you got the wrong information from a 3rd party website, however there is a major difference between frustration and
spreading lies for not checking our official pages.
Again, we have nothing to do with numbers displayed on MNRanks, I have no idea how they calculate their estimate and our official MN page shows an average that is not inflated (feel free to check the script!) hence the major difference between the 2 numbers.
Again here is it:
90 seconds per block = 960 blocks daily in average.
50% PoW, 50% PoS means 48000 MAG through PoW + INSIGNIFICANT_AMOUNT through PoS (my script
entirely ignores this amount, how more fair can you be?).
You take this and divide by the number of masternodes and there you go, it gives you an average of earnings per masternodes.
YET, things to consider.
1) A very high standard deviation because the rewards vary from ~0 to 100 MAG. So you may see masternodes earning 400 MAG and others less than 1 MAG with yet an average of 200 MAG, we have been explicit about this - always.
2) The network conditions being constantly on the move, the
arithmetic mean would not pretend to hold long enough to be practically observed.
Hope this ends the lies my friend.