Pages:
Author

Topic: 🔥🔥[ANN][MINTME]🌎MintMe.com Coin⚡️CPU mining⚡️DApps via Websites🚀No ICO/ASIC - page 33. (Read 84960 times)

jr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 1
List of known Webchain pools (WEB) :

https://miningpoolstats.stream/webchain

Live hashrate distribution, pool fees & minimum payment comparison.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Fork happened as planned, here is new wallet that you should use after the fork (old one will cause errors during transactions), https://github.com/webchain-network/webchain-wallet/releases/tag/v1.2.1

We also remind to update your miner that we released 2 weeks ago, https://github.com/webchain-network/webchain-miner/releases

I've updated my miner on all my machines. I"m getting about 50% of the original hashrate. According to the network hashrate that appears to be widespread. Is this expected?
jr. member
Activity: 96
Merit: 1
Fork happened as planned, here is new wallet that you should use after the fork (old one will cause errors during transactions), https://github.com/webchain-network/webchain-wallet/releases/tag/v1.2.1

We also remind to update your miner that we released 2 weeks ago, https://github.com/webchain-network/webchain-miner/releases
member
Activity: 404
Merit: 10
Take a look at the progress of development here:
http://webchain.network/news/webchain-development-update-march-2019

Regards,
Pavel
It's nice to see that the project is developing no matter what. Web payments look very interesting. I will follow the updates.
newbie
Activity: 88
Merit: 0
Hi to all. Please read an update on our website regarding Coinroom http://webchain.network/news/coinroom-is-closing.

Regards,
Pavel
jr. member
Activity: 96
Merit: 1
we remind you about upcoming fork on 8th April. If you just send and receive WEB, you will just have to download new wallet on 8th April after the fork (new wallet will show up only after fork happened). If you are miner - download new miner, it will automatically switch to new protocol if you are mining on a pool that was updated. If you are pool operator - please update, you have all new sources on our github. And if you have WEB on exchange, you don't have to do anything. CPUs should see hashrate jump after the fork.
newbie
Activity: 88
Merit: 0
Have you ever wanted to install own Webchain pool, but couldn't do it because didn't know certain details? It's not a problem anymore because we made a detailed guide about it. Check more here: https://webchain.network/news/detailed-guide-about-webchain-pool-installation

Regards,
Pavel
newbie
Activity: 88
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 88
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Krunzy.com Webchain (WEB) Mining Pool Shocked

Pool:                   Krunzy Webchain Pool    
Website:              http://webchain.pool.krunzy.com
Location:             USA
Pool Fee:              0.4%
Min Payout: 1 WEB every 60 minutes
Features:
  • Individual worker statistics
  • Pool Blocks History with luck and linked blockchain explorer
  • Payment History
Pool difficulty:   
                       1000-100000 VariDiff webchain.mine.krunzy.com:1111
                       10000-100000 VariDiff webchain.mine.krunzy.com:2222
                       25000 StaticDiff webchain.mine.krunzy.com:3333
                       75000 StaticDiff webchain.mine.krunzy.com:4444
                       150000 StaticDiff webchain.mine.krunzy.com:5555

Getting Started/ Miner Software: http://webchain.pool.krunzy.com/#/help
More here: http://krunzy.com/webchain-mining-pool/

Good luck!

http://krunzy.com
member
Activity: 211
Merit: 10
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 509
I see price is going up and buy orders as well for webchain  Wink
It was expected: Buy the news before the release and sell after the release. Easy money:

we have released new wallet, although give it few days to mature if you are cautious Smiley We tested it but we could have missed something. https://github.com/webchain-network/webchain-wallet/releases. It should improve performance on busy wallets + many random errors. Also introduces webchain:// addresses in browser. full changelog on github
jr. member
Activity: 96
Merit: 1
we have released new wallet, although give it few days to mature if you are cautious Smiley We tested it but we could have missed something. https://github.com/webchain-network/webchain-wallet/releases. It should improve performance on busy wallets + many random errors. Also introduces webchain:// addresses in browser. full changelog on github
sr. member
Activity: 521
Merit: 256
Anyone willing to share their hash-rate?

I'm currently getting around 500 h/s on a 2950x. Can't seem to push it any higher than that using the cryptonight-webchain miner. Is that a good speed?


{
    "algo": "cryptonight-webchain",
    "av": 0,                // algorithm variation, 0 auto select
    "background": false,    // true to run the miner in the background
    "colors": true,         // false to disable colored output
    "cpu-affinity": null,   // set process affinity to CPU core(s), mask "0x3" for cores 0 and 1
    "cpu-priority": null,   // set process priority (0 idle, 2 normal to 5 highest)
    "donate-level": 5,      // donate level, mininum 1%
    "huge-pages": true,
    "hw-aes": null,
    "log-file": null,       // log all output to a file, example: "c:/some/path/webchain-miner.log"
    "max-cpu-usage": 75,    // maximum CPU usage for automatic mode, usually limiting factor is CPU cache not this option.
    "print-time": 60,       // print hashrate report every N seconds
    "retries": 5,           // number of times to retry before switch to backup server
    "retry-pause": 5,       // time to pause between retries
    "safe": false,          // true to safe adjust threads and av settings for current CPU
    "threads": 16,        // number of miner threads
    "user-agent": null,
    "watch": false,


I think you should be getting double that.

Here are some tips:

1. If you're using Windows, make sure you're running the miner as admin, otherwise it will not allow for huge pages.
2. Setting cpu affinity helps. Instead of "threads": 16, use this to affine the threads each to a physical core:

"threads": [
        {"low_power_mode": false, "affine_to_cpu": 0 },
        {"low_power_mode": false, "affine_to_cpu": 2 },
        {"low_power_mode": false, "affine_to_cpu": 4 },
        etc. until 16 threads...
        {"low_power_mode": false, "affine_to_cpu": 30 }
],

I've spent several hours trying to figure out why I can't get a better hashrate.  I seem to be getting the best hashrate when using 8 threads (which maxes out around 700). After doing a TON of googling and reading through forums I realized that my solution was much simpler... I have 8 slots on my motherboard from RAM.  I placed my ram sticks on one side of the motherboard (which means that the CPU couldn't use all 16 cores to their full potential) I moved one stick over to the other side and I can get a max of 1400 h/s on 16 threads.  Although, i've got this tuned to 12 cores to try and keep the temp down.  (I'm still getting 1050 h/s which seems reasonable enough)

If you want to keep your temp and power consumption down, consider running 8 dual threads instead of 16 normal. Just change low_power_mode": false to low_power_mode": true in all (now 8 ) threads. You'll be running half the number of threads, but al of them will use double cache. You should be getting around 1100 H instead of 1400, but with 25% CPU usage instead of 50%.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
I see price is going up and buy orders as well for webchain  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
Nice, what a cool looking motherboard. I guess that is specific for your 2950x. Never seen such a thing and i build mining and gaming rigs for the last 10 years lol. But never really looked deep into that CPU and board. Impressive!! thanks for sharing.  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Thats an awesome hash rate now  Smiley

Not sure if what your referring to is this, but ram slots determine whether or not you will see true DDR from it. I just fixed my sons gaming rig, and his step brother had moved the ram around on it and had lost its Dual MODE DDR. Once the ram sticks were configured back, the motherboard bios stated ram was in DDR Dual Mode (and not single) anymore. It wasn't before. And his gaming has improved now. ok, was just wondering if that had maybe the impact on your CPU? lol... but glad to hear you got it straight. Thats fast!!

PS: I am getting 363 hashes on AMD 8350 8 core   Roll Eyes

My motherboard is very similar to this one:

https://c1.neweggimages.com/NeweggImage/ProductImage/13-157-784-V06.jpg

I've seen on dual CPU motherboards that each section of 4 ram slots is dedicated to 1 CPU.  If you put 2 CPUs in and only use 1 section of ram slots then only 1 CPU will actually work.  (Not sure if that is universal for all motherboards). I placed all of my ram onto the right side of the motherboard & could max out my hashing on 8/16 cores. So my assumption is that my OS can see all 16 cores in the CPU, but can only utilize 8 to their full potential.  Moving a ram stick from the right side onto the left instantly fixed my problem and let me use up to 16/16 cores. 
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
Thats an awesome hash rate now  Smiley

Not sure if what your referring to is this, but ram slots determine whether or not you will see true DDR from it. I just fixed my sons gaming rig, and his step brother had moved the ram around on it and had lost its Dual MODE DDR. Once the ram sticks were configured back, the motherboard bios stated ram was in DDR Dual Mode (and not single) anymore. It wasn't before. And his gaming has improved now. ok, was just wondering if that had maybe the impact on your CPU? lol... but glad to hear you got it straight. Thats fast!!

PS: I am getting 363 hashes on AMD 8350 8 core   Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Anyone willing to share their hash-rate?

I'm currently getting around 500 h/s on a 2950x. Can't seem to push it any higher than that using the cryptonight-webchain miner. Is that a good speed?


{
    "algo": "cryptonight-webchain",
    "av": 0,                // algorithm variation, 0 auto select
    "background": false,    // true to run the miner in the background
    "colors": true,         // false to disable colored output
    "cpu-affinity": null,   // set process affinity to CPU core(s), mask "0x3" for cores 0 and 1
    "cpu-priority": null,   // set process priority (0 idle, 2 normal to 5 highest)
    "donate-level": 5,      // donate level, mininum 1%
    "huge-pages": true,
    "hw-aes": null,
    "log-file": null,       // log all output to a file, example: "c:/some/path/webchain-miner.log"
    "max-cpu-usage": 75,    // maximum CPU usage for automatic mode, usually limiting factor is CPU cache not this option.
    "print-time": 60,       // print hashrate report every N seconds
    "retries": 5,           // number of times to retry before switch to backup server
    "retry-pause": 5,       // time to pause between retries
    "safe": false,          // true to safe adjust threads and av settings for current CPU
    "threads": 16,        // number of miner threads
    "user-agent": null,
    "watch": false,


I think you should be getting double that.

Here are some tips:

1. If you're using Windows, make sure you're running the miner as admin, otherwise it will not allow for huge pages.
2. Setting cpu affinity helps. Instead of "threads": 16, use this to affine the threads each to a physical core:

"threads": [
        {"low_power_mode": false, "affine_to_cpu": 0 },
        {"low_power_mode": false, "affine_to_cpu": 2 },
        {"low_power_mode": false, "affine_to_cpu": 4 },
        etc. until 16 threads...
        {"low_power_mode": false, "affine_to_cpu": 30 }
],

I've spent several hours trying to figure out why I can't get a better hashrate.  I seem to be getting the best hashrate when using 8 threads (which maxes out around 700). After doing a TON of googling and reading through forums I realized that my solution was much simpler... I have 8 slots on my motherboard from RAM.  I placed my ram sticks on one side of the motherboard (which means that the CPU couldn't use all 16 cores to their full potential) I moved one stick over to the other side and I can get a max of 1400 h/s on 16 threads.  Although, i've got this tuned to 12 cores to try and keep the temp down.  (I'm still getting 1050 h/s which seems reasonable enough)
Pages:
Jump to: