With your... unique way to reply me, I'll color code the sentences so anyone following will be able to understand easier. Red is me and blue is you.
Let me answer your questions:
Can you please point us out to where this asked and suggested from your community happened? I asked because I raked through your TG and find no discussion about change in reward allocation at all.- We have asked our top holders community in Discord, not in Telegram.
Congratulation, you're the first project that successfully made me use discord to broaden my DD. As I am rather new to discord and probably will still have to familiarize myself with the UI, please send us screenshot of this discussion, or point me out to the date where this conversation happened so I can read them myself. Why I'm so privy about this issues? Two things:
1. The difference between the old tokenomy and the new ones lies on the staking program, which was not on the first tokenomy, and you claimed that the change were made by discussion with your community, that is not on tg but on discord, while jumping to earliest day of your discord creation informed me that one day after its creation (with no visible chat of said discussion in between) you announced the staking program, I think it's justified if people wondered where and who exactly pushed this decision.
2. Let's assume you do follow your (as per your words) community advise, these "community" are your top holders? It might be wise to inform people that at the point, you're doing a sale through whitelist and (disregarding if they're real user or just a shill accounts) many users from the community regretted that they're didn't get whitelisted and unable to hold. This means your top holders are the ones that managed to be whitelisted, which was chosen randomly. How are they represent the "community"? Does this means you didn't consider the opinion of those unlucky that they can't participate on whitelist and therefore unable to be a "top holders", and also, you didn't involve "other" part of the community (the small holders and those not lucky enough to be whitelisted)? How about those on tg? Their opinion didn't count toward the consideration? Because if they are, then the discussion should happen on as many channel as you have instead of just discord, and limited to the "top holders". Or, you can say that your decision to change the tokenomy is not based on your community interest, but rather limited to your top holders, but of course then it'll made us questions the legitimacy and accuracy of your past and future statements
Ok, now where on earth do you get fund for manual buyback from? You're not selling or getting involved in any activity that generates income to perform a manual buyback. - We have a marketing wallet that is funded by each sell and we have decided to use part of the money for manual buybacks. We have also used some of the funds from the public sale to buy some MBF tokens that have been added to our staking pool.
Oh lord, I really hope you didn't say this. Amuse me, how many percentage of token sold were allocated for "marketing wallet" and how much currently available on this wallet? Oh, this reminds me that I wanted to ask, where is your token sale allocation information? I can only see the tokenomy, but not the token allocation. Were this indisclosible? If you're confused, I'm referring to the section that inform readers this percentage of token is used for what and that percentage is for that,
Again, can you shows the newest token allocation? You don't even need to be fancy with graph etc. Simple numbers and percentage typed on this thread is sufficient to help me better understand your situation. - There is no new token allocation at the moment, only the one that you see on the website and the current thread because the staking platform is not live yet. The changes in tokenomics will be in place when we launch the platform.
Just to be sure, again, the difference between the old tokenomy were the allocation of token gathered from sell-fee, the staking program, and the reflection? And you're currently don't have a number for your newest tokenomy? So there is a third tokenomy after these two? Or you're just simply forgot that you had them all this time on your litepaper?
Well, it's true being reviewed by crypto youtube influencer, it's good to see the video and getting a good reaction from the audience so far.
Already viewed by 29k user and also get 1.3K likes, freaking good to me..
What I can think is, that must have cost a lot of money to hire him to do this with the best of his ability, quite enough to make the response that this project is well funded.
Well I didn't watch the video, but if you have and you're impressed with what you saw so much that you think it is freaking good, then let's hope I was wrong and he did a small DD before accepting any project instead of just accepting and promoting and shilling whoever pay him, because from what I currently get, it's not good.