Topic: ☀ANN☀【MWC】 MultiWalletCoin ◈ X11 POW◈POS ◈ Bittrex listed! ◈ Road map published! - page 20. (Read 58500 times)
August 10, 2014, 02:22:32 PM
crashed to nothing....
August 10, 2014, 02:20:23 PM
By the way, will it be open source?
yeah dont make it open source.
Its all good as long as you don't protect your code but don't stop people from copying the method otherwise
I think it's ok to have it closed source during beta, let the price rise, and then release open source final in a few weeks. That way even if a copy cat copies the technology, this coin will already be the dominant one with it. But for a new technology to be taken seriously it has to be open source. Nobody will trust closed source technology with their money.
actually I was going to update the source on github but you make a good point
Maybe its good to keep source closed for a while. Would like to hear more opinions regarding this matterLet's see this thing in action first, then we can decide if we'll open or close this beta
I'd say keep the source closed for as long as possible. Rather invite some skilled developers into private repo to make a great coin!
August 10, 2014, 02:14:22 PM
This is a mine and dump coin with fpga or whatever they are using to rape x11.
I would say it's more like bot with purpose to drop the price, I saw that more than few times.
someone dropped up to 5 million in one hour
August 10, 2014, 02:13:06 PM
This is a mine and dump coin with fpga or whatever they are using to rape x11.
I would say it's more like bot with purpose to drop the price, I saw that more than few times.
August 10, 2014, 02:07:05 PM
This is a mine and dump coin with fpga or whatever they are using to rape x11.
August 10, 2014, 02:05:51 PM
I hate X11 
August 10, 2014, 02:00:50 PM
MultiWalletCoin development update
First of all I'd like to thank everyone for your interest in MultiWalletCoin! This means a lot to me and makes development much more fun
Beta wallet is amost complete
Also I've sweetned up wallet design since default style isn't fun at all. Its hard to code when its not fun
I still have to rework scattering feature because sometimes it freezes the blockchain for a long time and I am still working on a solution to make sure it never happens. Even tho it may require more time then expected I am sure there will be no need for any mandatory wallet updates which is a good thing. Stay tuned! As soon as I'll find a solution I'll let you guys know and release beta wallet
First of all I'd like to thank everyone for your interest in MultiWalletCoin! This means a lot to me and makes development much more fun
Beta wallet is amost complete
Also I've sweetned up wallet design since default style isn't fun at all. Its hard to code when its not fun
I still have to rework scattering feature because sometimes it freezes the blockchain for a long time and I am still working on a solution to make sure it never happens. Even tho it may require more time then expected I am sure there will be no need for any mandatory wallet updates which is a good thing. Stay tuned! As soon as I'll find a solution I'll let you guys know and release beta wallet
Lookin good, awating the awesome release.
August 10, 2014, 01:58:59 PM
This is a mine and dump coin with fpga or whatever they are using to rape x11.
Like i said earlier:Change algo to Qubit, or Fresh, or limit hashrate to 20-25M. X11 is raped by huge farms/fpga.
Coin will be in control 3-7 hands ..
Coin will be in control 3-7 hands ..
X11 is unfair in POW distro.
August 10, 2014, 01:50:24 PM
By the way, will it be open source?
yeah dont make it open source.
Its all good as long as you don't protect your code but don't stop people from copying the method otherwise
I think it's ok to have it closed source during beta, let the price rise, and then release open source final in a few weeks. That way even if a copy cat copies the technology, this coin will already be the dominant one with it. But for a new technology to be taken seriously it has to be open source. Nobody will trust closed source technology with their money.
actually I was going to update the source on github but you make a good point
Maybe its good to keep source closed for a while. Would like to hear more opinions regarding this matterLet's see this thing in action first, then we can decide if we'll open or close this beta
August 10, 2014, 01:48:19 PM
1 there is a hidden pre mine and its being dumped in drips and drabs at any price OR
Something is wrong. The price shouldn't go this low.
August 10, 2014, 01:44:46 PM
o man.. these x11 farms/fpga totally raped this coin
August 10, 2014, 01:41:30 PM
By the way, will it be open source?
yeah dont make it open source.
Its all good as long as you don't protect your code but don't stop people from copying the method otherwise
I think it's ok to have it closed source during beta, let the price rise, and then release open source final in a few weeks. That way even if a copy cat copies the technology, this coin will already be the dominant one with it. But for a new technology to be taken seriously it has to be open source. Nobody will trust closed source technology with their money.
actually I was going to update the source on github but you make a good point
Maybe its good to keep source closed for a while. Would like to hear more opinions regarding this matterVoting for closed source in beta phase
August 10, 2014, 01:34:20 PM
keep up the good work dev
August 10, 2014, 01:33:58 PM
By the way, will it be open source?
yeah dont make it open source.
Its all good as long as you don't protect your code but don't stop people from copying the method otherwise
I think it's ok to have it closed source during beta, let the price rise, and then release open source final in a few weeks. That way even if a copy cat copies the technology, this coin will already be the dominant one with it. But for a new technology to be taken seriously it has to be open source. Nobody will trust closed source technology with their money.
actually I was going to update the source on github but you make a good point
Maybe its good to keep source closed for a while. Would like to hear more opinions regarding this matter August 10, 2014, 01:21:23 PM
Good looking coin. Great job Dev
August 10, 2014, 01:20:46 PM
By the way, will it be open source?
yeah dont make it open source.
Its all good as long as you don't protect your code but don't stop people from copying the method otherwise
I think it's ok to have it closed source during beta, let the price rise, and then release open source final in a few weeks. That way even if a copy cat copies the technology, this coin will already be the dominant one with it. But for a new technology to be taken seriously it has to be open source. Nobody will trust closed source technology with their money.
August 10, 2014, 01:16:43 PM
By the way, will it be open source?
yeah dont make it open source.
Its all good as long as you protect your code but don't stop people from copying the method otherwise
August 10, 2014, 12:58:12 PM
By the way, will it be open source?
August 10, 2014, 12:56:34 PM
dev, ETA on beta wallet? If you have to delay for more testing are we looking at a day, a couple days, a week? Thanks.
Should be no more then a day. I am hoping for couple more hours since it seems I've already found a solution to the scattering problem. Testing it right now
I have to say, I doubted you, as you can see by my comment in this thread. That's because of all the scams we've seen lately. I'm really excited to see this new tech you've got.
August 10, 2014, 12:38:05 PM
dev, ETA on beta wallet? If you have to delay for more testing are we looking at a day, a couple days, a week? Thanks.
Should be no more then a day. I am hoping for couple more hours since it seems I've already found a solution to the scattering problem. Testing it right now
Jump to: