Loved the article, Evander pointed out what I'm sure many of us were thinking...
"I have no doubt that R3 made it worth Mike’s while to divest himself of Bitcoin and any such entanglements." ... "Maybe by buying out Hearn, they can destroy Bitcoin from the inside-out?"
"So why did I title this “Why I Applaud Mike Hearn For Turning on Bitcoin?” He is doing what is best for himself, financially. He is exposing himself as a true capitalist, not an altruistic computer developer devoting his life to Bitcoin, and seeing it through to the end. " This is a difficult problem for Bitcoin, who can really devote their lives to Bitcoin development long term without some sort of compensation. Eventually, without some sort of long term funding strategy, the money will just dry up. Development is very time consuming and needs dedicated people who can essentially devote their lives to it, especially with something as complicated as Bitcoin.
This story is all over the news. Mike may have had motivation to stretch the truth, but I wonder how much of a problem it will be for network stability as we start to reach capacity, that seems like it could be a real issue. I guess we are going to find out
"Sometimes it takes a crisis to get everyone in a room... So if we are going to have a crisis, let's get on with it. No better time than the present."