edit: please don't put words in my mouth, I just said noxt is not a decentralized projecto
i think pikuchato means the governance of the project. Lets ASSUME Rofo would never appear again.
It would have a very hight chance to die in the current stage
(its about the stage of a project, its about the mind of an exiting community, NOT about a founding gap).
And pikuchato is correct in my view, same is for 98% of all projects here on bitcointalk including my own, Europecoin
in the beginning but there jumped many in in and it COULD survive if I would vanish, but the chance would be not too high either.
But thats it, decentralisation at the social layer is a PROCESS, not a property.
Nearly ALL Projects are one Person has a initial Idea/Plan/Vision,
may share it and then others follow, Thats not a decentratizized strukture eben when the Project is
building an TECHNICAL decentralized system that COULD get SOCIALY decentral over time. (like happened to Bitcoin)
This is not eval, but it is how things start - even bitcoin.
Did you realize how strange it is, that coins, left by their maintainer normally die?
(Beware: IRONIC SATIRE ATTEMPT) Well a vanished developer is a bad thing,
we had this in Btrcoin we don't want to have that again ... lol
from perspective from today’s people, even (spoiler: blaspheme attempt)
Sathoshi Nakamoto could get named scammer.
(dont even dare to put THESE words into my mouth: its an example)
in my first paper on the ERC takeover i wrote my opinion, that the biggest gap, we will have to fill,
is the decentralization of our minds, how we think, function and govern (or not govern) as a society.
This (great) discussion here, draws the full picture of what i meant with that.
By the way, great to heart from you Rofo, PM me if you need help with your hosting.
have fun
Matthias
.