Thanks for your opinion,
Wow, no question asked, just marked as scam. I`ve contacted the writer and waiting for explanation.
Regarding the mail. We all have our mails with the domain name, I just prefer gmail, its the fastest way the people can reach me (+ I am using google docs of this address to calculate the bounties,...).
If anyone feels better they can write us on [email protected]
regards,
saso Hello
I'm the founder of the Tracker and one of the Curators.
Your project has been flagged as an alert. SCAM projects are marked for example so
https://icotracker.net/project/decloudsNext a few thoughts on why an Alert is set.
If you decide to appeal to the community for financial help in realizing your idea, the goodwill is so kind and open your faces in a broad sense. Give people irrefutable proof of your experience. Provide a technical proof of the concept. Justify your decision about such large bonuses for early birds... is not it easier to write 10% instead of 5? This is all a game of words often used by scammers. Show real development progress. During all this time, you wrote at least a couple of lines of code? So just show it on GitHub ) etc.
Do not misunderstand me. All these thoughts are based on a real 3-year experience of investing in ICO. I look at your website, which is made "on the knee" under the WordPress (on probation), and I catch déjà vu from the scamers for 3 years and I can not understand how the people who created this site can realize the notarial platform.
I hope I managed to convey the main idea.
Hi SeanPiknick,
I could go on and on on the same level of debate you started. Fortunately, some members of btt sugest us to calm down and not to reply to different provocations. However, your post and rating on your website is beyond just a simple one-man-band estimate of our project and Notary team (by the way, we started with Pre-ICO or presale, ICO is planed for September). I was always wondering what kind of people judge the others (with the high possibility of destroying their bussines, credibility, lives etc., if they are wrong) based on quick estimate of the available information, but at the same time, they were not able to even correctly rewrite few simple informations (you were not able to find a link to my LinkedIn account, but you were able to do that for many others; you gave us 50 points rating, but still we were given scam alert – yes, I noticed that you corrected the rating after my message to your curator who resets it to zero). Any suggestion, how should I judge your professionalism and objectivity of your post and ratings based on mistakes you did?
I do not argue about your rating. But on your website is stated: »Now it still in prototype phase. It’s means what ICO Tracker and his rating is only an idea and no more! You should not make any decisions on this rating because it’s completely subjective!« As I wrote above, such »subjective« ratings have consequences. I hope you can cope with that.
Our investors can get refunded after unsuccesful Pre-ICO which ended a few days ago (those who decided so, already got). Everything till now was transparent and it will remain so. We will continue with the project with the remaining funds or without them, only deliveries will be at different times. We made some mistakes and most likely, we will make more in the future. But we did and we will do our best to fix them. We have only one small request – please, let us allow to work and to focus on the project you estimated we do not have knowledge and competence for it. Let as allow to surprise you, whoever you are.
Last, but not least, I would like to thank our community, who support us. Kind words are welcome. It's true that harsh and unpleasant things/words make us stronger, but as humans, we can stand only a certain dose of them.
With this post I conclude the debate about our team and Notary Platform rating on
https://icotracker.net/project/ntry_platform .
Sean, I wish you the best.
Regards,
Iztok