What data are you going to collect and analyse for your reviews? How would that differ from existing services?
The data will be the one, presented by the projects (WP, Github, website), but it will be looked into in a critical manner. Through our guidelines analysts will be breaking down the business plan piece by piece, developers will be evaluating the code, researchers will be digging for any inconsistencies with the team' statements, alleged collaborations, etc. We'll be very skeptical and critical towards all projects. Investors need protection, while promising ventures need to be highlighted. Our strive is to introduce blockchain to the everyday life, not to promise everyone to be a millionaire someday.
We are mainly interested in the usability of the crypto-assets, hence, we are developing our own Proof of Usability concept. Beta-testers will be trying the products and services for themselves before laying down their estimates. If a product or a service cannot be adopted by the general public, then they have no future. Unlike our competitors, we are interested mainly in the disruptive projects, that could survive a possible market crash - not the speculative cryptocurrencies.
When we rate a project, some of the factors we will base that on will be the
Idea, Usability, Adoption, Development, Founders, Team, Advisers, Partners, Investors, Competitors, SM activity, Existing customer base, Roadmap, Code, Product and more.
As i understood, this team wants to hire some experts, in order to provide high quality analysis, so it won't be just another ICO-list with overall info and an estimate.