Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANNOUNCE] BitcoinStats.org - Graph of recent transaction confirmation times. (Read 5218 times)

sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 251
Is this dead? The charts don't work any longer...

Yes, the blockchain has grown too large for ABE (a block explorer) to catch up which I depended on. I've removed links to the project where I can find them on the Wiki and I suppose I should point the domain to a better stats website.
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
Is this dead? The charts don't work any longer...
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 501
There is more to Bitcoin than bitcoins.
It would be nice to also have histograms for the 'with fee' and the 'without fee' transactions (plotted on the same chart) so you could easily compare their expected confirmation times, and see how much time the standard fee inclusion will buy you. 

Bump, plus adding a vote for the histogram.  Many thanks for providing this service.
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 251
It is. This chart is more meant for new people to get an appreciation for the distribution of transactions and how long they take to get confirmed. The notion of TX size is foreign to them. Also, a scatter-plot of TX size vs confirmation time would be boring- it would be a solid straight line from left to right with a couple extra dots higher up for the few big transactions. It wouldn't convey any information since the plots along the line would be so dense that it would appear to be uniform.
sr. member
Activity: 440
Merit: 250
#SWGT CERTIK Audited
Isnt the tx size more important than the amount of BTC? Or maybe not.. I woulod like to see a graph of that, though. Tx size versus time to confirm.
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 251
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
What happened in the Thursday 10/6 timeframe?  The charts make it look to me like a total system failure of the Bitcoin network.

Are you asking what is the 'count' like after Oct 4th? If so, I don't know yet- The program that counts unique nodes runs on Tuesdays.

Oops.  =red-face=  I was thinking of this:

 http://bitcoinstatus.rowit.co.uk/hosts.html

I just went looking around for the announcement of that page (which had been in a browser tab of mine for a long time) and got the wrong announce mail.  Sorry about that.
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 251
What happened in the Thursday 10/6 timeframe?  The charts make it look to me like a total system failure of the Bitcoin network.

Are you asking what is the 'count' like after Oct 4th? If so, I don't know yet- The program that counts unique nodes runs on Tuesdays.
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
Bump.

What happened in the Thursday 10/6 timeframe?  The charts make it look to me like a total system failure of the Bitcoin network.
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 251
A chart tracking the difference between their means over time would also be nice for seeing how the miners' fee schedules evolve.

Thanks for the lovely charts!

That is an excellent idea. It would be interesting to see in the future. If I add another chart, it will probably be this one.


Awesome work!!

 But, at the "Versions" page, why you don't show "0.3.24" instead of "32400" at first place?
 So, we do not need a "caption" down the page...
 Congratulations!

Best,
Thiago

Thank You ^_^
32400 is the format used by the Bitcoin network. If I was to substitute it out for 0.3.24 myself, the site would not be forward compatible and I would constantly be bugging people to know what the next version numbers would be like this guy: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.529469
Also, there are 'curious' version numbers like 31903 that give evidence of custom implementations. Which I find interesting.


I very much enjoy the website. Every bitcoin website I've visited usually has a donate address somewhere, and so when I decided that I wanted to send a little something your way I was surprised that I couldn't find a link anywhere, not even in your sig! How ironic is it that most forum members contribute nothign of value and ask for free btc, while you created this website and don't beg.

But seriously, can you put up a donate link so I can toss a few bits your way?

That is very gracious of you! Thank You  Smiley
1MqJCduQmqyyxhQ2sjs6dhDJd4o61jDK7k
full member
Activity: 129
Merit: 100
I very much enjoy the website. Every bitcoin website I've visited usually has a donate address somewhere, and so when I decided that I wanted to send a little something your way I was surprised that I couldn't find a link anywhere, not even in your sig! How ironic is it that most forum members contribute nothign of value and ask for free btc, while you created this website and don't beg.

But seriously, can you put up a donate link so I can toss a few bits your way?
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!
Awesome work!!

 But, at the "Versions" page, why you don't show "0.3.24" instead of "32400" at first place?
 So, we do not need a "caption" down the page...
 Congratulations!

Best,
Thiago
sr. member
Activity: 461
Merit: 251
It would be nice to also have histograms for the 'with fee' and the 'without fee' transactions (plotted on the same chart) so you could easily compare their expected confirmation times, and see how much time the standard fee inclusion will buy you.  A chart tracking the difference between their means over time would also be nice for seeing how the miners' fee schedules evolve.

Thanks for the lovely charts!
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 251
hm, why does it show ten times more nodes than http://bitcoinstatus.rowit.co.uk ?
I'm curious about that myself. I have double-checked that I am not counting IPs twice.
hero member
Activity: 991
Merit: 1011
hm, why does it show ten times more nodes than http://bitcoinstatus.rowit.co.uk ?
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
Your site is Ballz! Nice job.
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 251
Very nice!  What accounts for the difference in the number of unique clients and the total of the clients by version?

One can only find out what version another node is running by connecting to them. The vast majority of hosts are behind a firewall and I cannot connect to them. I have to wait for them to connect to me. A couple additional hosts are already maintaining too many connections- like ~125- and aren't accepting more.


Nice statistics. Note that the number of BTC in transaction is less significant because people can send back and fro in short time. Instead it is better to show the graph of number of transaction vs time interval which will directly give information of the transaction waiting time distribution, which is expected to be Poison.

Such a chart would be more difficult for new users to grasp. Also it would never change and that would be a bit boring. I did consider it though. Similarly, it could be a line graph showing the percentage of transactions that were confirmed by that time. For example- at 1 minute, the line might be around 10%. At 10 minutes, the line would be around 50%. And at 60 minutes, the line would be around 90%. It would get to 99.9% somewhere around 300 minutes (just a guess).


For the count page, the number of client is larger than expectation because its number should be of the same order of magnitude of miner, as they are always connect the the network, which should only be few ten thousand only. You may take a look of http://bitcoinstatus.rowit.co.uk/ which shows that there is around 50k. Counting unique IP is not a good method because it is easier to change it occutionally.

I don't understand. Could you please elaborate? Or could someone else elaborate? Thank You.


Why does the graph on the transaction timer page start at -8.3? Shouldn't it start at 0? Or is it so you can better see those transactions which took less than a minute?

It makes it easier to see. If you drag a box to zoom in, it adjusts automatically.


Very nice service and good looking website! Can you make it so that we can look at transactions from longer periods than 4 hours? Maybe 24? Very nice all around though Grin

That's a thoughtful suggestion. I actually did have it set at 24 hours originally, but the number of transactions- and thus data points- that occur over a 24 hour period is extremely high and is too much for browsers to render. You'll notice that when zooming, it is already slow. Though if more people would like that much data, I could add a button to view the 24-hour chart. In the future, as Bitcoin becomes more popular, if browsers cannot handle all of the transactions [chart data points] that occur in a 4 hour period, I will need to lower this value further.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Very nice service and good looking website! Can you make it so that we can look at transactions from longer periods than 4 hours? Maybe 24? Very nice all around though Grin
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Why does the graph on the transaction timer page start at -8.3? Shouldn't it start at 0? Or is it so you can better see those transactions which took less than a minute?
o
member
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
Nice statistics. Note that the number of BTC in transaction is less significant because people can send back and fro in short time. Instead it is better to show the graph of number of transaction vs time interval which will directly give information of the transaction waiting time distribution, which is expected to be Poison.

For the count page, the number of client is larger than expectation because its number should be of the same order of magnitude of miner, as they are always connect the the network, which should only be few ten thousand only. You may take a look of http://bitcoinstatus.rowit.co.uk/ which shows that there is around 50k. Counting unique IP is not a good method because it is easier to change it occutionally.
Pages:
Jump to: