Topic: [Announcement] HyperX Technologies presents current chip development - page 2. (Read 3778 times)
June 04, 2013, 05:06:55 AM
HyperX where is the proof that you are working closely with TMSC?
June 04, 2013, 05:01:10 AM
Is this the mythical bigfoot or loch ness?
Honestly if this was real there will be some creditable news coverage with that money. Never will it be shown in forums.
Don't know what you want to get us for but then again we never know do we?
Honestly if this was real there will be some creditable news coverage with that money. Never will it be shown in forums.
Don't know what you want to get us for but then again we never know do we?
It's hard to tell if the people in here taking it seriously are fake accounts to show it's "legit" or if they really are that stupid. If they are that stupid they deserve to lose their money.
June 04, 2013, 04:58:19 AM
Is this the mythical bigfoot or loch ness?
Honestly if this was real there will be some creditable news coverage with that money. Never will it be shown in forums.
Don't know what you want to get us for but then again we never know do we?
Honestly if this was real there will be some creditable news coverage with that money. Never will it be shown in forums.
Don't know what you want to get us for but then again we never know do we?
June 04, 2013, 04:07:52 AM
Quote
P.S. If you want to donate us: 129WmWYybUer7hwvkpvHJREK8qCJeryzr2 Thank you very much!
It's amusing to see that someone who is receiving $5million+ is asking for donations
+1
HyperX is a trademark registered by Kingston.
http://trademark.markify.com/trademarks/ctm/hyperx/003598257
I call scam.
Oh, We havent registered trademark yet... Our company name is HyperX Technologies not HyperX...
June 04, 2013, 03:55:44 AM
Quote
P.S. If you want to donate us: 129WmWYybUer7hwvkpvHJREK8qCJeryzr2 Thank you very much!
It's amusing to see that someone who is receiving $5million+ is asking for donations
+1
HyperX is a trademark registered by Kingston.
http://trademark.markify.com/trademarks/ctm/hyperx/003598257
I call scam.
June 04, 2013, 03:17:52 AM
14nm? Are you guys teamed up with Cryoniks' bullshit department?
June 04, 2013, 03:14:29 AM
For initial design start we needed 25 Million Euros
The only thing that's real here is the 25 mio he needs
The only thing that's real here is the 25 mio he needs
We don't need nothing from you guys. We just want to show our baby to the world and get some support into development. We are not asking money for creating.
I for one will wait and watch for an offering. Glad to see another group jump into the asic design mix.
June 04, 2013, 02:51:49 AM
For initial design start we needed 25 Million Euros
The only thing that's real here is the 25 mio he needs
The only thing that's real here is the 25 mio he needs
We don't need nothing from you guys. We just want to show our baby to the world and get some support into development. We are not asking money for creating.
June 04, 2013, 02:50:01 AM
For initial design start we needed 25 Million Euros
The only thing that's real here is the 25 mio he needs
The only thing that's real here is the 25 mio he needs
June 04, 2013, 02:44:49 AM
14nm, LOL. Unless you are from the future I don't see that happening
June 04, 2013, 02:41:58 AM
We are not using simple sha256 core. The core of this chip was designed to perform multiple calculations across engines and share calculation data between chips (this is there speed come in) By calculating sha256 it split is jobs across several engines and save parts of data in memory and then computing second hash it uses that data. I can't perfectly describe this operation because myself don't know how it works. But it a lot better than simple sha256 core hash engines.
Better for what? Are you saying it has applications besides mining bitcoins and other SHA256 cryptocurrencies? If so, what are these other applications?
No I mean it's not simple sha256 core that everyone is using. It's highly revised and scaled engine which shares calculation data across other engines. Working in this it has faster hash rate than normal cores.
June 04, 2013, 02:36:57 AM
We are not using simple sha256 core. The core of this chip was designed to perform multiple calculations across engines and share calculation data between chips (this is there speed come in) By calculating sha256 it split is jobs across several engines and save parts of data in memory and then computing second hash it uses that data. I can't perfectly describe this operation because myself don't know how it works. But it a lot better than simple sha256 core hash engines.
Better for what? Are you saying it has applications besides mining bitcoins and other SHA256 cryptocurrencies? If so, what are these other applications?
June 04, 2013, 02:19:07 AM
Do you take Visa?
<3 Never seen this one. Thanks k9! June 04, 2013, 02:11:52 AM
This product will be a PCI Express card? That would be a great way to upgrade an existing GPU miner!
Sorry, but it only communicates with other chips via pci-e
We are not producing it we are just developing the design for it. The manufacturer process will not begin very soon...
So please don't shout here. We are working with the major companies who work with SoC and they are designing it.
Best Regards,
Tomas
Thanks for the heads up keep us posted.
No problem
Manufacturing Process TSMC 14nm
These people are so fucking stupid, if you are going to try and scam people don't claim you are building 14nm chips when no one has them, multiple billion dollars company's are hoping to get the tech by end of the year and your claiming you can do it now!! TSMC are hoping for end of 2014
SANTA CLARA, Calif. – Globalfoundries and Samsung are in a dead heat to get their first 14 nm production wafers out before the end of the year, aiming to beat rival TSMC Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. by as much as a year. Meanwhile, an IBM building in New York sits empty, waiting for an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machine to light the way to the industry’s longer-term future.
These people are so fucking stupid, if you are going to try and scam people don't claim you are building 14nm chips when no one has them, multiple billion dollars company's are hoping to get the tech by end of the year and your claiming you can do it now!! TSMC are hoping for end of 2014
SANTA CLARA, Calif. – Globalfoundries and Samsung are in a dead heat to get their first 14 nm production wafers out before the end of the year, aiming to beat rival TSMC Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. by as much as a year. Meanwhile, an IBM building in New York sits empty, waiting for an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machine to light the way to the industry’s longer-term future.
Dear Sikman,
We are not producing it we are just developing the design for it. The manufacturer process will not begin very soon...
So please don't shout here. We are working with the major companies who work with SoC and they are designing it.
Best Regards,
Tomas
P.S. We are working closely with TSMC for this design.
Care to show some kind of proof?
Edit: If i understood correctly scrypt protocol needs good memory, but SHA256 doesn't need that kind of memory. Why does an ASIC chip for Bitcoin require GDDR5 memory? I'm not so good on the technical stuff so i may be wrong.
50 GH for 180 W seems really bad for 14 nm. 3.6 W / GH. Asicminer chips are 7W/GH and they are like 110nm. A 2x increase in performance/power seems like very little for an 8x reduction in process size. Intel CPUs increased in performance from about 0.4 Gflops to 100 Gflops at the same power level with a comparable 8x reduction in process size (from 180 nm to 22 nm), a performance/power increase of 250x compared to your 2x...
Also no reason to build this on a PCIE interface... the data throughput is not needed, and it unnecessarily limits people to just a few per computer or requires expensive and finicky adapters/risers/extenders/etc, when it could just be USB.
Based on this, given that a real company spending millions on such a project would know the above, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say this isn't real...
Also no reason to build this on a PCIE interface... the data throughput is not needed, and it unnecessarily limits people to just a few per computer or requires expensive and finicky adapters/risers/extenders/etc, when it could just be USB.
Based on this, given that a real company spending millions on such a project would know the above, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say this isn't real...
We are not using simple sha256 core. The core of this chip was designed to perform multiple calculations across engines and share calculation data between chips (this is there speed come in) By calculating sha256 it split is jobs across several engines and save parts of data in memory and then computing second hash it uses that data. I can't perfectly describe this operation because myself don't know how it works. But it a lot better than simple sha256 core hash engines. Adding more chips to the same PCI-e bus will make computing power going not by 2x but I think 3x or even 4x it depends on firmware in ARM.
Prototypes will be made in 28nm technology and by the end of 2013 ar earlier we will start making 14nm protoypes.
What is your website address so I can pre order before anyone else?
Currently we don't have one. We will only start pre orders then we will make the first batch of the chips and pcb and everything is done.
We will take mainly BTC. With Fedex, DHL, UPS and local pick ups in our offices across the world.
So you're just designing it, but you're not the manufacturer? Is the manufacturer Cedartec?
Currently we now making only the chip design when we will be manufacturing it and after this we will start assebly line.
June 04, 2013, 12:22:49 AM
So you're just designing it, but you're not the manufacturer? Is the manufacturer Cedartec?
June 03, 2013, 11:18:13 PM
Interesting but seems difficult to to realize
too nice to be true
Too good to be True, more like a S
June 03, 2013, 11:05:53 PM
June 03, 2013, 10:56:46 PM
To quote the late great Carl Sagan:
I am not seeing it.
Quote from: carl sagan
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
I am not seeing it.
June 03, 2013, 10:46:22 PM
50 GH for 180 W seems really bad for 14 nm. 3.6 W / GH. Asicminer chips are 7W/GH and they are like 110nm. A 2x increase in performance/power seems like very little for an 8x reduction in process size. Intel CPUs increased in performance from about 0.4 Gflops to 100 Gflops at the same power level with a comparable 8x reduction in process size (from 180 nm to 22 nm), a performance/power increase of 250x compared to your 2x...
Also no reason to build this on a PCIE interface... the data throughput is not needed, and it unnecessarily limits people to just a few per computer or requires expensive and finicky adapters/risers/extenders/etc, when it could just be USB.
Based on this, given that a real company spending millions on such a project would know the above, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say this isn't real...
Also no reason to build this on a PCIE interface... the data throughput is not needed, and it unnecessarily limits people to just a few per computer or requires expensive and finicky adapters/risers/extenders/etc, when it could just be USB.
Based on this, given that a real company spending millions on such a project would know the above, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say this isn't real...
June 03, 2013, 10:37:31 PM
What is your website address so I can pre order before anyone else?
Jump to: