[ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[The Future is Almost Here] - page 124.

bathrobehero

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1051

ICO? Not even once.

Quote from: Oakey22 on February 01, 2017, 04:41:55 PM

sure something is wrong, i am putting 3200MH/s on one rig and 2500MH/s on the other at this and 0 blocks found

Read my previous comment.

The miner who has the time set furthest into the future hijacks the whole blockchain so nobody else can mine.

Whoever is finding the blocks is essentially the only miner on the chain until someone sets their time ahead of him.

jc12345

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1013

Quote from: ?? on ??

Can somebody host a node Huh

Maybe that will fix this time sync issue.

You should have put a stumbling block in the way of the GPU miners to let them figure it out for at least a few hours to have a better distribution by the minnow CPU miners while difficulty was low enough. Now a few GPU miners have chased up the difficulty higher from the word go and got all the easy blocks. If GPUs could have waited for a few hours it would have been better.

MrJaekin

sr. member

Activity: 275

Merit: 258

How do we host a node? Wallet without mining?

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

mmh no block so far 5GH in play, what is the net exactly, it can't be only 11GH like the explorer say...

eule

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 501

How to check difficulty and net hashrate?

HasHe

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 500

Theres no windows wallet to download

Oakey22

sr. member

Activity: 488

Merit: 322

sure something is wrong, i am putting 3200MH/s on one rig and 2500MH/s on the other at this and 0 blocks found

snook

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

takes the fun out of a launch watching greedy farm miners take all the blocks. damn I wish the days of bitcoin being $5 were back. oh well wishful thinking.

hope you guys have fun!!!

Please let there be a dev out there to create a coin that pays completely random. 1 cpu miner or a farm with 500 gpu's has an equal chance.

eule

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 501

Quote from: faxxer on February 01, 2017, 04:32:44 PM

It's like not working, because my RX480 just generate around 500MH+ not 16000MH+, something wrong somewhere and why your block still 0?

Ah shit didn't even notice that it said 160 thousand MH... Grin

Perhaps a bug, switched back to the original kernel for now. Cry

fikihafana

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Seriously my cpu can't compete with gpu Cheesy

. I prefer to mine cryptonite, it's more worth Tongue

. bye

Slava_K

hero member

Activity: 677

Merit: 500

Sombody set time on miner host +1.5 minutes. (kontikwp).

MrJaekin

sr. member

Activity: 275

Merit: 258

Wow! bahbahwp is cleaning up!!

Loepuenkyou

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

wait to bounty, but plan open bounty or not
translation bounty, signature campaign, social media campaign (twitter and facebook campaign)
you need indonesian translation, iam reserve indonesian translation if open bounty translation

jc12345

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1013

This sucks balls big time. Congrats to the couple of GPU miners that got things working out of the blocks.

eule

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 501

Quote from: MrJaekin on February 01, 2017, 04:31:49 PM

HAHA! Are you getting tons of blocks? Wink

160MH is nothing when a single 1070 does 750MH... so no, not 1 block yet. I am wondering if I should switch back to 50 MH...

Edit: More nodes!!!

faxxer

full member

Activity: 203

Merit: 100

Quote from: eule on February 01, 2017, 04:29:35 PM

Miner v0.2 with pascalsha.cl replaced by pascal.cl from the sgminer from suprnova (see https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17700276 ):

Before I got 50MH (AMD 6950). Not sure yet if it works properly though or if I am wasting my time and electricity...

It should work, right? Cheesy

@mtwelve: It is very rare, that it takes this long for a pool to appear though. During these weeks small people didn't stand a chance getting even one coin...

It's like not working, because my RX480 just generate around 500MH+ not 16000MH+, something wrong somewhere and why your block still 0?

MrJaekin

sr. member

Activity: 275

Merit: 258

Quote from: eule on February 01, 2017, 04:29:35 PM

Miner v0.2 with pascalsha.cl replaced by pascal.cl from the sgminer from suprnova:

Before I got 50MH (AMD 6950). Not sure yet if it works properly though or if I am wasting my time and electricity...

It should work, right? Cheesy

@mtwelve: It is very rare, that it takes this long for a pool to appear though. During these weeks small people didn't stand a chance getting even one coin...

HAHA! Are you getting tons of blocks? Wink

eule

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 501

Miner v0.2 with pascalsha.cl replaced by pascal.cl from the sgminer from suprnova (see https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17700276 ):

Before I got 50MH (AMD 6950). Not sure yet if it works properly though or if I am wasting my time and electricity...

It should work, right? Cheesy

@mtwelve: It is very rare, that it takes this long for a pool to appear though. During these weeks small people didn't stand a chance getting even one coin...

mtwelve

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1009

Quote from: eule on February 01, 2017, 04:17:45 PM

Miners:
CPU & AMD https://sourceforge.net/projects/pascalcoin/files/ (maybe tweakable with pascal.cl from https://pasc.suprnova.cc/sgminer-5.5.0-pascal-1-windows-amd64.zip Huh

)
NVIDIA: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ccminersp-mod-modded-nvidia-maxwell-pascal-kernels-826901

Quote from: mtwelve on February 01, 2017, 04:17:17 PM

Quote from: eule on February 01, 2017, 04:11:43 PM

Quote from: mtwelve on February 01, 2017, 04:10:05 PM

Unless there's an improvement from pascal 2 to pascal, I honestly do not see the reason why there should be a clone of it besides a quick cash grab from the inevitable PND if I'm being real with you guys. Can someone explain?

With pool software readily available, distribution should work better than with PASC1, where in the last few weeks only those with really big rigs were able to mine a block due to diff being very high and no pool being available.

All this could be fixed with a hard fork and some software development. I don't see the justification to split and make a new clone. We saw what happened with ETH when it split off into two currencies.

The damage is done though, only the big guys stand a change in getting more than a few PASC.

Re: NO BLOCKCHAIN Invalid time: I set my Windows clock two minutes forward and the error disappeared, not sure what's going on.

Isn't that the same for Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency that's been established? That's why pool mining is the meta if you're not mining a datacenter. So again, still don't see the justification for a new coin just to give miners another chance to mine some coin before difficulty goes up. So my answer stays no, there should not be a clone.

bathrobehero

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1051

ICO? Not even once.

Quote from: adaseb on February 01, 2017, 04:20:07 PM

No idea why we are getting the invalid time when during the testnet it ran fine.

Maybe the blocks are too close together, when the difficulty goes higher it will get better, I know that the original PascalCOin had this -negative time issue also.

I'm just guessing here, but...

Because the main miner's system clock was ahead of everyone else and I guess because there's only one node, so it doesn't care.

It baffles me that this coin uses timestamps like that to allow or prevent mining.

Anyway, I added +2 minutes to my system clock and I quickly found 2 blocks while before that my cards were only really mining for like 6 seconds total in 85 blocks or so because otherwise I was behind in time about a minute.

Hopefully, if we had a handful of nodes they'd have a clear consensus of the precise time so a miner who has the time set the farthest couldn't take all the blocks.

Anyway, I'm done with Pascal and all of its forks.

Topic: [ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[The Future is Almost Here] - page 124. (Read 164899 times)