Rating to Peculium seems to be below :
https://wiserico.com/ico/peculium
4.7
https://cryptorated.com/ico-reviews/peculium/
1.8
https://foxico.io/project/peculium
6.5/10
https://icobench.com/ico/peculium
3.2
https://icoholder.com/en/ico/tge-peculium-ico-16009
3.68
This list is awesome, you can see that rating is vert different over sites. First link doesnt work. The second, 1.8 is pretty low because they rated competition and innovation low.
I honestly don't get the low ratings on innovation, i mean honestly AI machine learning based savings accounts, don't seem like something thats very abundant or highly competitive at the moment so why would they hit pcl's ratings for innovation on that, I really don't like cryptorateds style of reviewing where they throw out a rating but don't actually give a reasoning for why they rated a certain value low.
And worst of all WTF doe sthe fact that they are an ERC20 token mean they knocked down on overall ICO score, because they don't develop their own blockchain?!?! Most good company based ICO's are erc20 as theirs no reason for a brand new blockchain, it's what ethereum was developed for.
you should also realize that some ICO review site are only there for the money.. i mean they churn out review based on what and what they can get from this ICOs not necessarily because of due diligence.. the crypto world is relatively new so u don't expect all eggs to be good.
Dude majority of the ICO review videos are useless. I actually tried to reach to some and guess the pricing they ask? 4 BTC + average of 10k in fiat for an "unbiased" review. We know it is not going to be neutral that is for sure. so don't take those videos seriously
Wow you serious?? Is there that much manipulation and people paying that sort of money for a "review" or "promotion" that is bloody crazy... I guess similar to John McAfee with his tweets. Crazy money for some sort of 'marketing'
well u gotta weed out the hype ones, still good reviews out there. Even when paid.