Author

Topic: [ANN][PIVX] - PRIVATE INSTANT VERIFIED TRANSACTION - PROOF OF STAKE - ZEROCOIN - page 511. (Read 782382 times)

legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
Is solomining working for anyone? trying to gpu mine against the wallet, saying slow/down or wrong credentials.

Doesn't work for me either with ccminer. Happens with very few wallets. But I'm curious if that's universal (cgminer/etc).

Probably unhelpful but ccminer with protocol debug:

> POST / HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Basic *
Host: *
Accept-Encoding: deflate, gzip
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 45
User-Agent: ccminer/1.7.3
X-Mining-Extensions: longpoll noncerange reject-reason
X-Mining-Hashrate: 0

< HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
< Connection: close
< Content-Length: 76
< Content-Type: application/json
* Server darknet-json-rpc/v1.0.1.0-cbcb549 is not blacklisted
< Server: darknet-json-rpc/v1.0.1.0-cbcb549
<
* Closing connection 0
JSON protocol response:
{
   "error": {
      "code": -32601,
      "message": "Method not found"
   },
   "result": null,
   "id": 0
}
full member
Activity: 226
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 250
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Is solomining working for anyone? trying to gpu mine against the wallet, saying slow/down or wrong credentials.


legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
Read the ANN.. You must have a unique public IP for each Masternode. You can not use your loopback IP as the address.
hero member
Activity: 638
Merit: 500
I can find all of my "masternode outputs" listed in "masternode list" and "masternode start-many" didn't show any error. Does it mean all my MNs runing ok and receiveing fees?
And how much DNET could i get with 1 MN per day?

Yes. That sounds good.

Here's the formula for MN payment: 50 x 1440 / (total MN count) = 1 MN payment per day
Where total MN count can be figured out by running "masternode count" on your wallet.

284 masternodes total, so it's around 250 DNET per masternode per day now.
I launched 5 masternodes 2 hours ago and didn't get any payment yet. I should get around 25 blocks per day. Ok, i'll wait and watch.
3 of my 5 masternodes received payments during the night. I checked "masternode outputs" and "masternode list". Only 2 of my masternodes were in the list. I typed "masternode start-many" and 3 masternodes were added to the list again.
Why could they stopped during the night?
So after starting 5 masternodes 23 hr ago i received only 5 payments.


As the number of Masternodes increases it is becoming more and more difficult to find your Masternodes with "masternode list". A better way to check on your Masternodes is by using "masternode list-conf", it will show you the status of all Masternodes in your masternode.conf. Also, as opposed to using "masternode start-many", you should use "masternode start-alias XXX" replacing the XXX with the alias of the Masternode you want to start that you used in your masternode.conf. Using the start-many function causes all of you Masternodes to be moved to the end of the queue, resulting in lost payment opportunities. There are a variety of reasons for Masternodes to fall out of the list, start by double checking that the wallets are actually running, have sufficient connections, and that the appropriate configuration files are setup properly.

Thanks for useful post!
I have 4 masternodes on 4 VPS, they are working fine now. And i'm trying to run one MN on my controller wallet. It starts and in 20 minutes has status "MISSING".

Settings for this MN in masternodes.conf:
Code:
MN1 127.0.0.1:51472 MNPRIVATEKEY TX_ID TX_INDEX

Settings in darknet.conf:
Code:
rpcuser=USERNAME
rpcpassword=PASSWORD
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
listen=1
server=1
daemon=1
logtimestamps=1
maxconnections=256
masternode=1
masternodeprivkey=MNPRIVATEKEY

Am i missing something? Or running a MN on controller wallet is not allowed?

And one more question. If i want to release 10000 DNET from one masternode (leaving other masternodes untouched) which command should i type?
sr. member
Activity: 275
Merit: 250
full member
Activity: 228
Merit: 100
Profitable? Sure.
But then again.. so is prostitution.
Doesn't mean you have to sell ass.
What kind of man runs a masternode anyway?


member
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
Is setting up a masternode any profitable now?
sr. member
Activity: 295
Merit: 250
We are getting close to the first budget payout, s3v3nh4cks and I have decided we should see how people feel about throwing a bunch of coins into a general fund address. This could be used for just about anything related to the advancement of the coin, and we wouldn't have to wait until the next budget payment cycle. There have already been a few ideas regarding its use, paying to get listed on a larger exchange, funding a faucet, paying the fellow we have working on the new website, maybe a different block explorer, those types of things. Any money spent from the general fund would be done so with complete transparency.

I am breaking these 3 proposals into 3 posts. They will all be for a filling of the general fund's coffers, just for different amounts. The monthly budget allows for a total of 1,080,000 DNET, Vote for the amount of that you would like to see go into the general fund. I will edit each one of these with the voting information for it in just a bit.

#1 Proposal to add 1 million DNET to the general fund
hash=322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 no" to vote against


Excellent idea, I will upvote proposal#1 with all my master nodes.

I have the below doubts:
When will the voting end.
If more than 1 proposal gets more than 10% vote, which one will be approved and how the funds will be distributed.

Voting ends at block 43200. If multiple proposal receive enough votes to be approved the one with the most yes votes is paid first, and then the one with the second most yes votes is paid. This continues until all budget proposals are paid or there is not enough left in the budget to pay the next proposal in line.

Thanks for clarifying that.
full member
Activity: 226
Merit: 100
We are getting close to the first budget payout, s3v3nh4cks and I have decided we should see how people feel about throwing a bunch of coins into a general fund address. This could be used for just about anything related to the advancement of the coin, and we wouldn't have to wait until the next budget payment cycle. There have already been a few ideas regarding its use, paying to get listed on a larger exchange, funding a faucet, paying the fellow we have working on the new website, maybe a different block explorer, those types of things. Any money spent from the general fund would be done so with complete transparency.

I am breaking these 3 proposals into 3 posts. They will all be for a filling of the general fund's coffers, just for different amounts. The monthly budget allows for a total of 1,080,000 DNET, Vote for the amount of that you would like to see go into the general fund. I will edit each one of these with the voting information for it in just a bit.

#1 Proposal to add 1 million DNET to the general fund
hash=322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 no" to vote against


Excellent idea, I will upvote proposal#1 with all my master nodes.

I have the below doubts:
When will the voting end.
If more than 1 proposal gets more than 10% vote, which one will be approved and how the funds will be distributed.

Voting ends at block 43200. If multiple proposal receive enough votes to be approved the one with the most yes votes is paid first, and then the one with the second most yes votes is paid. This continues until all budget proposals are paid or there is not enough left in the budget to pay the next proposal in line.
sr. member
Activity: 295
Merit: 250
I have a proposal too.

Sell.

Yey, wonderloops is back. Now price will go up Smiley.

Please keep bumping the thread.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
full member
Activity: 228
Merit: 100
I have a proposal too.

Sell.
sr. member
Activity: 295
Merit: 250
We are getting close to the first budget payout, s3v3nh4cks and I have decided we should see how people feel about throwing a bunch of coins into a general fund address. This could be used for just about anything related to the advancement of the coin, and we wouldn't have to wait until the next budget payment cycle. There have already been a few ideas regarding its use, paying to get listed on a larger exchange, funding a faucet, paying the fellow we have working on the new website, maybe a different block explorer, those types of things. Any money spent from the general fund would be done so with complete transparency.

I am breaking these 3 proposals into 3 posts. They will all be for a filling of the general fund's coffers, just for different amounts. The monthly budget allows for a total of 1,080,000 DNET, Vote for the amount of that you would like to see go into the general fund. I will edit each one of these with the voting information for it in just a bit.

#1 Proposal to add 1 million DNET to the general fund
hash=322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 no" to vote against


Excellent idea, I will upvote proposal#1 with all my master nodes.

I have the below doubts:
When will the voting end.
If more than 1 proposal gets more than 10% vote, which one will be approved and how the funds will be distributed.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
Everyone, We now have 5 Proposals on the Docket. If you run a Masternode, please vote. Check the ANN for the Specifics.

Thanks,

s3v3n
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1722
https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF
s3v3nh4cks posted a forum message last week with regards to 'testing' anonymity and privacy settings for this crypto, when using Tor.

Being interested in this project purely from the network perspective of a crypto-currency towards digital-cash, herewith some example configurations;

CLIENT only (example);

.conf

Quote
listen=0
port=989
proxy=127.0.0.1:9150
maxconnections=8
onion=127.0.0.1:9150
addnode=y5kcscnhpygvvnjn.onion:989
addnode=5bmhtjvn2jvwpiej.onion:989
addnode=pyfdxkazur3iib7y.onion:989
addnode=ok3ym5zy6m5klimk.onion:989

Allows .exit traffic (pushes peer connectivity through Tor for anonymity) and addnode=.onion connectivity (within the Tor network).

torrc (example);

Quote
ClientOnly 1

SOCKSPolicy accept 127.0.0.1/8

LongLivedPorts 21, 22, 706, 989, 1863, 5050, 5190, 5222, 5223, 6523, 6667, 6697, 8300

ExitPolicy reject *:*

EDIT: SOCKSPort 9150  and  ControlPort 9051 are already set in torrc-defaults in TBB, removed from above to avoid confusion / start-up conflicts.

N.B. 'Default' LongLivedPorts + Port 989
See: https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html

- Using SOCKSPort 9150 allows connectivity through the Tor Browser Bundle. 'Expert' Tor package is still SOCKSPort 9050.
See: https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html#TBBSocksPort

CLIENT only addnode=.onion (example);

.conf

Quote
listen=0
port=989
maxconnections=4
onion=127.0.0.1:9150
onlynet=onion
addnode=y5kcscnhpygvvnjn.onion:989
addnode=5bmhtjvn2jvwpiej.onion:989
addnode=pyfdxkazur3iib7y.onion:989
addnode=ok3ym5zy6m5klimk.onion:989

N.B. addnode=.onion's / maxconnections=8 (you don't need more than 8 connections - more connections are worse for privacy.)

Disable wallet UPnP. Disable incoming connections.


'Dual Stack' Nodes and/or Masternode (example);

See: How-to set-up Tor on a Linux VPS: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/how-to-guide-set-up-tor-on-linux-ubuntu-and-connect-bitcoin-1374919

Regular dual stack node .conf (example) ;

Quote
listen=1
port=51472
maxconnections=256
onion=127.0.0.1:9050
addnode=y5kcscnhpygvvnjn.onion:989
addnode=5bmhtjvn2jvwpiej.onion:989
addnode=pyfdxkazur3iib7y.onion:989
addnode=ok3ym5zy6m5klimk.onion:989

or dual stack masternode .conf (example) ;

Quote
listen=1
daemon=1
server=1
port=51472
externalip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
rpcport=51471
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcuser=long random username
rpcpassword=longer random password
maxconnections=256
onion=127.0.0.1:9050
addnode=y5kcscnhpygvvnjn.onion:989
addnode=pyfdxkazur3iib7y.onion:989
addnode=ok3ym5zy6m5klimk.onion:989
addnode=5bmhtjvn2jvwpiej.onion:989
logtimestamps=1
masternode=1
masternodeprivkey=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Linux masternode VPS / Tor torrc (example);

Quote
ClientOnly 1

SOCKSPort 9050

SOCKSPolicy accept 127.0.0.1/8

Log notice file /var/log/tor/notices.log

ControlPort 9051

HiddenServiceDir /var/lib/tor/dnet/
HiddenServicePort 989 127.0.0.1:51472

HiddenServiceStatistics 0

ORPort 9001

LongLivedPorts 989

ExitPolicy reject *:*

DisableDebuggerAttachment 0

NumEntryGuards 8

N.B. example config. enables your addnode=.onion incoming address located here:

Code:
sudo nano /var/lib/tor/dnet/hostname

- Port 989 (ftps-data) example presented for better network transition over Tor, which is not really designed for P2P usage.
- https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy

...

This request coincided with the release of Bitcoin Core version 0.12.0 ...

Automatically use Tor hidden services
-------------------------------------

Starting with Tor version 0.2.7.1 it is possible, through Tor's control socket
API, to create and destroy 'ephemeral' hidden services programmatically.
Bitcoin Core has been updated to make use of this.

This means that if Tor is running (and proper authorization is available),
Bitcoin Core automatically creates a hidden service to listen on, without
manual configuration. Bitcoin Core will also use Tor automatically to connect
to other .onion nodes if the control socket can be successfully opened. This
will positively affect the number of available .onion nodes and their usage.

This new feature is enabled by default if Bitcoin Core is listening, and
a connection to Tor can be made. It can be configured with the `-listenonion`,
`-torcontrol` and `-torpassword` settings. To show verbose debugging
information, pass `-debug=tor`.


Thus, as to how exactly alt. crypto-currencies like DASH - with an existing focus towards privacy and anonymity of transactions were already handling this in terms of user required know-how - was interesting research.

...

It will also be interesting to see how the developers here can manage to successfully transition from PoW to PoS , with masternodes.

~ True anonymity and privacy of transactions will probably always remain less than 98.9% 'snake-oil' anyway ...

- Privacy and Money
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTRFuWtxawM - not a 'crazy' person  Cheesy

- 'CASHLESS SOCIETY'
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbLJ_ztxxAs - "from a non-practising agnostic"   Roll Eyes   ~ SWIM
  
full member
Activity: 226
Merit: 100
#3 Proposal to add 10 DNET to the general fund (10 DNET is the minimum allowable payment when preparing a proposal, this is effectively a vote to add nothing to the general fund)
hash=07d79d32962b0337ee7bfc026f2394a4f44d59016d393affd1ac27277f1ab25c
"mnbudget vote 07d79d32962b0337ee7bfc026f2394a4f44d59016d393affd1ac27277f1ab25c yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 07d79d32962b0337ee7bfc026f2394a4f44d59016d393affd1ac27277f1ab25c no" to vote against
full member
Activity: 226
Merit: 100
#2 Proposal to add 500k DNET to the general fund
hash=d884ccec200bdf737ac522c1dd7afa8a78fe8eb67b49385cc477dd9e28eb9e69
"mnbudget vote d884ccec200bdf737ac522c1dd7afa8a78fe8eb67b49385cc477dd9e28eb9e69 yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote d884ccec200bdf737ac522c1dd7afa8a78fe8eb67b49385cc477dd9e28eb9e69 no" to vote against
full member
Activity: 226
Merit: 100
We are getting close to the first budget payout, s3v3nh4cks and I have decided we should see how people feel about throwing a bunch of coins into a general fund address. This could be used for just about anything related to the advancement of the coin, and we wouldn't have to wait until the next budget payment cycle. There have already been a few ideas regarding its use, paying to get listed on a larger exchange, funding a faucet, paying the fellow we have working on the new website, maybe a different block explorer, those types of things. Any money spent from the general fund would be done so with complete transparency.

I am breaking these 3 proposals into 3 posts. They will all be for a filling of the general fund's coffers, just for different amounts. The monthly budget allows for a total of 1,080,000 DNET, Vote for the amount of that you would like to see go into the general fund. I will edit each one of these with the voting information for it in just a bit.

#1 Proposal to add 1 million DNET to the general fund
hash=322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 yes" to vote in favor
"mnbudget vote 322a8e3132c5dc4fd59c7c97d97c9198cbb6beeb87da6b8f5000f4161125f7f8 no" to vote against
Jump to: