a few numbers from the pledge: So far 0.55btc has been collected (only from a small number of rather large donator).
so we are about 0.95btc from the goal.
It would be good at that point if small miners were also starting to send a little to the pledge.
The point here is to have contribution from as many members as possible of the community.
Time for people to wake up. If the pledge does,'t reached its goal, it will most likely be released as private...
Topic: [ANN]pledge for the release of 100% faster cuda 7.5 nvidia miner for neoscrypt - page 15. (Read 17315 times)
January 10, 2016, 08:30:03 PM
January 10, 2016, 07:31:38 AM
You should change the title to 25% faster neoscrypt miner for nvidia cards 
yeah probably... concerning cuda 7.5, I didn't have time to do any optimisation and for the moment, the sm 3.5 (780ti), doesn't work with it.
the 750ti reports roughly the same hashrate and the 980 are reporting 800kh/s rather than 850kh/s with cuda 7.5
testing right now the sp 78 compiled with cuda 7.5, I get 98kh/s with the 750ti (still getting with with mine 200kh/s) so I guess I am 100% faster with cuda 7.5
ok updated the title: [ANN]pledge for the release of 100% faster cuda 7.5 nvidia miner for neoscrypt
(yeah well...
, I won't mention the fact that with sp miner, I can't run my 2 980 at the same time) January 10, 2016, 06:08:10 AM
You should change the title to 25% faster neoscrypt miner for nvidia cards
January 09, 2016, 06:24:28 PM
Djm34, does this version work fast on cuda 7.5? How does it compare to itself compiled on 6.5? Thanks.
i can fully test this compiled with 7.5 on fedora 23 x64 ...
if you want to test it - i will allocate the miners for the donation link and add more to the pledge ...
just a thought you might want to ponder ...
#crysx
January 09, 2016, 11:55:59 AM
87a38017a306d45152261735da5a2c21473bd7891886783cd960b05bb2f45a67
Even if you don't reach the goal, consider this a thank you for your previous work and an incentive to opensource a little more, and troll a little less ;-)
Thanks for your support, can't promise much on the trolling part though Even if you don't reach the goal, consider this a thank you for your previous work and an incentive to opensource a little more, and troll a little less ;-)
(which is usually a reaction on something I consider as trolling)
January 09, 2016, 09:10:14 AM
Djm34, does this version work fast on cuda 7.5? How does it compare to itself compiled on 6.5? Thanks.
January 09, 2016, 06:43:37 AM
As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote) So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's)Hmmmm no.... your version should do 650-700 while mine does 560 on the 970.
ok I did a few check with the sp/pallas version (74), this new version is "only" 25% faster at this point.
January 08, 2016, 05:31:26 AM
Any chance we get numbers on a 970? Also, are these stock figures or with OC?
Regarding the 970, I don't have one... so it is difficult to say...
djm34 ...
is there a way we can gauge how far into the pledge we are as time goes on? ...
maybe an update in the op once every few days or something? ...
#crysx
sure, just need to use the block explorer: https://blockchain.info/address/16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw (+0.1btc actually)
I can add that link to the OP
January 08, 2016, 05:23:51 AM
Any chance we get numbers on a 970? Also, are these stock figures or with OC?
Regarding the 970, I don't have one... so it is difficult to say...
djm34 ...
is there a way we can gauge how far into the pledge we are as time goes on? ...
maybe an update in the op once every few days or something? ...
#crysx
January 08, 2016, 05:15:12 AM
Any chance we get numbers on a 970? Also, are these stock figures or with OC?
Regarding the 970, I don't have one... so it is difficult to say...
January 08, 2016, 05:04:38 AM
Any chance we get numbers on a 970? Also, are these stock figures or with OC?
January 08, 2016, 04:23:38 AM
Only 88% more in donations needed. Almost there! 
tbh, considering the pledge only started yesterday, this is rather good (and someone donated 0.1btc before the start of the pledge)Ah okay! That's better! Well, if you keep this thread alive, i'm sure you'll make it
Good luck!djm
January 08, 2016, 04:18:09 AM
Only 88% more in donations needed. Almost there!
tbh, considering the pledge only started yesterday, this is rather good (and someone donated 0.1btc before the start of the pledge)Ah okay! That's better! Well, if you keep this thread alive, i'm sure you'll make it
Good luck! January 08, 2016, 04:07:14 AM
Only 88% more in donations needed. Almost there!
tbh, considering the pledge only started yesterday, this is rather good (and someone donated 0.1btc before the start of the pledge) January 08, 2016, 03:58:44 AM
Only 88% more in donations needed. Almost there!
January 08, 2016, 03:07:24 AM
No. After Djm34 has released his new sourcecode I will add a few percent and add it to my fork as I usually do. Then you can donate.
thank you for allowing me to test the moderation January 07, 2016, 04:23:04 PM
As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote) So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's)will you look at adding support for cuda 2.1 djm ? or is it not applicable
I can look, however I can't promise; I tried on the previous version and didn't succeed.
January 07, 2016, 04:13:45 PM
As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote) So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's)Hmmmm no.... your version should do 650-700 while mine does 560 on the 970.
January 07, 2016, 04:10:57 PM
87a38017a306d45152261735da5a2c21473bd7891886783cd960b05bb2f45a67
Even if you don't reach the goal, consider this a thank you for your previous work and an incentive to opensource a little more, and troll a little less ;-)
Thanks for your support, can't promise much on the trolling part though Even if you don't reach the goal, consider this a thank you for your previous work and an incentive to opensource a little more, and troll a little less ;-)
(which is usually a reaction on something I consider as trolling)Djm
January 07, 2016, 04:10:27 PM
As far as I understand (please correct me, djm34, if I'm wrong), the 50% gain is based on the latest opensource kernel by djm34, NOT the one on the sp_ fork, which includes about 10% improvement by sp_ and another 10% by myself.
So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
don't know for sure actually, if you can tell me what is the hashrate of the opensource code (or which sp version to use, I can do a comparison, I think sp change on blake mixing was incorporated before I gave a quote) So the gain at the end should be about 30%.
ok so it is even more than 50% (I don't have a 970, I only have 980's)will you look at adding support for cuda 2.1 djm ? or is it not applicable
Jump to: