Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN]pledge for the release of 100% faster cuda 7.5 nvidia miner for neoscrypt - page 4. (Read 17315 times)

hero member
Activity: 835
Merit: 1000
There is NO Freedom without Privacy
Ok i tried cuda 6.5 version as DJM said it faster. Here are my result which i will submit now to Elivop's site.

No flags/switches used, no OC. Efficiency is 99.5% for 750ti & 970. These are numbers after 1 hour run

sp rel71
750ti: 172 kh/s
970: 520 kh/s

djm 6.5

750ti: 202 kh/s(17.5%)
970: 605 kh/s(16.5%)

djm6.5nosync

750ti: +2-3kh/s
970: +10kh/s

EDIT: Forgot to thank djm34. Thanks for all your work. Last time you didn't answer my PM about mining donation i thought you really only want to sell to big miners & may be you do. Now i can see that with help of all parties in ecosystem a crowdfund can be successful. If you keep doing such crowdfunds every few months with similar improvements i think this can work.
Agreed!!

I donated .1 not because I'll ever earn that back but to support devs, especially djm which has done a lot for ccminer.

P.S. anything worth mining with the faster miner, haven't even downloaded yet. Just mining most profitable algo's at the moment. Planning to fill some bags with FTC but for now gotta earn this months electric costs before the bill comes  Grin
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Ok i tried cuda 6.5 version as DJM said it faster. Here are my result which i will submit now to Elivop's site.

No flags/switches used, no OC. Efficiency is 99.5% for 750ti & 970. These are numbers after 1 hour run

sp rel71
750ti: 172 kh/s
970: 520 kh/s

djm 6.5

750ti: 202 kh/s(17.5%)
970: 605 kh/s(16.5%)

djm6.5nosync

750ti: +2-3kh/s
970: +10kh/s

EDIT: Forgot to thank djm34. Thanks for all your work. Last time you didn't answer my PM about mining donation i thought you really only want to sell to big miners & may be you do. Now i can see that with help of all parties in ecosystem a crowdfund can be successful. If you keep doing such crowdfunds every few months with similar improvements i think this can work.
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
Quote from: djm34
the nosync refers to the command __syncthreads() which should be used when initializing the shared memory. However in some case (and some card) it isn't really needed and as it tends to slow down the kernel and removing it may increase the hashrate. however on some card it may cause some cpu validation issues.  


i notice sir. already try it and it does give about 10 kH/s more than standard cuda65 version but yes it also give many cpu validation in my card.

i think i will stick with cuda 65 default version. Smiley

i sincerely thank you for your work and all the donator that make this happen Cheesy


PS:
sorry i can't afford any donation, i'm doing this as a new hobby to run from the stress of my daily work for the past 8 weeks, i mine only about 4-5 hours and not every day, and only get about 0.001xxx BTC once a week on nicehash. purely to make me feel i can achieve something... even for that small amount. Sad
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 Grin

already submitted Smiley

the nosync refers to the command __syncthreads() which should be used when initializing the shared memory. However in some case (and some card) it isn't really needed and as it tends to slow down the kernel and removing it may increase the hashrate. however on some card it may cause some cpu validation issues.  
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 Grin

already submitted Smiley

I noticed! Already activated mate! Greatly appreciated!

You can find your card in the Nvidia section, if you hover over it you'll see your name :-)

Thx again!


Keep them coming guys! This will benefit everyone!


(Sorry for "kind of" spamming your thread Djm34)  Smiley
it's ok, I just came from sp ccminer which is in full retard mode... so not much I can't handle here Grin

Haha, i noticed, i kind of stopped reading it. It's gone to far.... :p
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 Grin

already submitted Smiley

I noticed! Already activated mate! Greatly appreciated!

You can find your card in the Nvidia section, if you hover over it you'll see your name :-)

Thx again!


Keep them coming guys! This will benefit everyone!


(Sorry for "kind of" spamming your thread Djm34)  Smiley
it's ok, I just came from sp ccminer which is in full retard mode... so not much I can't handle here Grin
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 Grin

already submitted Smiley

I noticed! Already activated mate! Greatly appreciated!

You can find your card in the Nvidia section, if you hover over it you'll see your name :-)

Thx again!


Keep them coming guys! This will benefit everyone!


(Sorry for "kind of" spamming your thread Djm34)  Smiley
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 Grin

already submitted Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
Cmon guys, i see a lot of results here, screenshots, speeds from different cards.


If it's not to much to ask.

Add those results here : Mining Hardware Comparison

 Grin
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
Test run cuda65.exe, both 970 and 980 up 14% from 1.5.74, thanks djm!

[2016-01-24 21:14:19] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060087
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 874
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 714
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 879
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] accepted: 114/114 (100.00%), 1552 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 21:14:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 711
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
Latest github

Centos 6, EVGA 750ti SC

cuda 7.5  ---> 135 KH/s
pool rate 175 KH/S !!!
works at -i 15, crashes at -i 16
no nonce errors after 5 minutes

cuda 6.5
    client: 125 KH/s client
    pool: +/ 5%
same intensity limits

SP_MOD r74 cuda 6.5 ---> 105 Kh/s
same intensity limits

The pool rate can't be faked by the miner so congratulations, 70% increase.

This is a critical milestone for ccminer and cuda 7.5. It is proof it can be more efficient
than 6.5. I much prefer your approach of more substantial increases in performance
with a limited period of exclusivity for donors. Keep up the good work.

Edit: corrected cut/paste error.

im getting 213 on my 750ti SC without -i
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
Latest github

Centos 6, EVGA 750ti SC

cuda 7.5  ---> 135 KH/s
pool rate 175 KH/S !!!
works at -i 15, crashes at -i 16
no nonce errors after 5 minutes

cuda 6.5
    client: 125 KH/s client
    pool: +/ 5%
same intensity limits

SP_MOD r74 cuda 6.5 ---> 105 Kh/s
same intensity limits

The pool rate can't be faked by the miner so congratulations, 70% increase.

This is a critical milestone for ccminer and cuda 7.5. It is proof it can be more efficient
than 6.5. I much prefer your approach of more substantial increases in performance
with a limited period of exclusivity for donors. Keep up the good work.

Edit: corrected cut/paste error.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
full member
Activity: 279
Merit: 104
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe
it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970

dope ill give you speeds Cheesy!!!


cant get it to run it just instantly closes but i can see something about x11 in it lol


edit nvm i fixed it i had brain fart brb will get speeds



[2016-01-24 13:16:18] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060042
[2016-01-24 13:16:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 907
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 904
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 54/54 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 889
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 55/55 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 884
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] accepted: 56/56 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:33] GPU #0: result for nonce $00D376D9 does not validate on CPU!
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 903
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 979
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] accepted: 58/58 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!

the cuda 6.5 counterpart nosync is on the release as well


kk testing 2 mins.  and dude i can give you access to one of my 980ti rigs if you need it to test?



6.5 no sync 980ti

[2016-01-24 13:39:43] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 989
[2016-01-24 13:39:43] accepted: 63/63 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1009
[2016-01-24 13:39:46] accepted: 64/64 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:46] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1000
[2016-01-24 13:39:47] accepted: 65/65 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 883
[2016-01-24 13:39:47] accepted: 66/66 (100.00%), 1880 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:49] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060071
[2016-01-24 13:39:49] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1003
[2016-01-24 13:39:49] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 853
[2016-01-24 13:39:53] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 993
[2016-01-24 13:39:53] accepted: 67/67 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:58] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 1002
[2016-01-24 13:39:58] accepted: 68/68 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:39:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 995
[2016-01-24 13:39:59] accepted: 69/69 (100.00%), 1881 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:40:04] GPU #0: result for nonce $00C5907F does not validate on CPU!
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
Great work, DJM!

My poor gtx750 1gb ))
start /realtime ccminer_cuda65.exe --cpu-priority 5 -a neoscrypt



First miner I see that uses bus interface load ~10% ))
looks good indeed
I am jealous of your 1gb 750, my poor 750ti wuth 2gb  gets only 200kh/s Grin
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe
it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970

dope ill give you speeds Cheesy!!!


cant get it to run it just instantly closes but i can see something about x11 in it lol


edit nvm i fixed it i had brain fart brb will get speeds



[2016-01-24 13:16:18] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060042
[2016-01-24 13:16:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 907
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 904
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 54/54 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 889
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 55/55 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 884
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] accepted: 56/56 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:33] GPU #0: result for nonce $00D376D9 does not validate on CPU!
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 903
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 979
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] accepted: 58/58 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!

the cuda 6.5 counterpart nosync is on the release as well
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
Great work, DJM!

My poor gtx750 1gb ))
start /realtime ccminer_cuda65.exe --cpu-priority 5 -a neoscrypt



First miner I see that uses bus interface load ~10% ))
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe
it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970

dope ill give you speeds Cheesy!!!


cant get it to run it just instantly closes but i can see something about x11 in it lol


edit nvm i fixed it i had brain fart brb will get speeds



[2016-01-24 13:16:18] neoscrypt.usa.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060042
[2016-01-24 13:16:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 907
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 904
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 54/54 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 889
[2016-01-24 13:16:25] accepted: 55/55 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 884
[2016-01-24 13:16:27] accepted: 56/56 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:33] GPU #0: result for nonce $00D376D9 does not validate on CPU!
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 903
[2016-01-24 13:16:34] accepted: 57/57 (100.00%), 1853 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 979
[2016-01-24 13:16:37] accepted: 58/58 (100.00%), 1852 kH/s yes!
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
I have added a new exe to the release: ccminer_cuda75_nosync.exe
it should be faster for the 980ti, but may cause cpu validation on the 960/970
Pages:
Jump to: