Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN/PoC] Coldkey Cryptobond - FIRST Timelocked Physical Bitcoin - page 2. (Read 2159 times)

legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3158
Edit - Never mind, answer is 2 posts above. I guess I was blind last night! Cheesy

Thanks again! Grin

Hey Owlcatz Smiley

Thanks for your post !
I read the un-edited version but sorry I couldn't reply at that moment.

Good if you understood / found the answer you were looking for. Cheesy

I can't wait for BTC to hit block #622,000 so tests will begin. Grin

It's currently sitting at #621,489.
Krogoth's test Cryptobond should expire in ~4,1 days (prediction based on the production of 144 blocks / 24hr, which is uncertain)



You can try to broadcast the transaction, it should fail and not load the public address as long as the time-lock hasn't expired.
When it expires, try again. Any error should have disappeared and the funds should arrive to the public address. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
Edit - Never mind, answer is 2 posts above. I guess I was blind last night! Cheesy

Thanks again! Grin
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
You can use this tool for instance : https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/decodetx/
Another option: https://coinb.in/#verify (can be used offline).
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3158
Is block height the only variable that can be used to determine the “unlock” date or can months, years, etc also be used?

If only block heights, I think it would be very cool to release bonds based on the next few sets BTC halvings: 840k, 1.05m, and 1.26m. Possibly longer depending on interest from everyone.. Just an idea if it hasn’t already been mentioned  Smiley

We can determine the expiration of the Cryptobond either with :

1) Block height
2) Epoch timestamp



As LoyceV underlined it, the current format of what is universally used as a timestamp will not be good anymore in 2038 as it currently exists.
I don't feel serene using that format to lock anything after 2035. (Assuming that BTC will work as it does today in 15 years)

Using a timestamp with Cryptobonds isn't very elegant anyway, as there is a +/- 2h wiggle time that appears to be random, for the different nodes to consider the lock as expired or not.

I believe that, when it comes to BTC mining, miners will take negative risks towards seeing their block rejected by the network, so they will wait a little bit more than what's necessary.

That's why I mostly do not consider to make Cryptobonds based off a date & time, but rather based off a block.



144 * 365 = 52560 blocks/year
Locking until currentBlock + (52560 * nbOfYears) block will expire around ~9th March in 2020 + nbOfYears.
(The precision of this prediction gets worse as the nbOfYears gets higher since BTC block production follow Poisson's distribution)
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Is block height the only variable that can be used to determine the “unlock” date or can months, years, etc also be used?
Yes, but it's more tricky:
As for how "hardcoded" that is, the documentation just says anything above 500 million... We're not going to see 500 million blocks in a few centuries, (what's that equivalent to anyway, ... )

So 10 years is about 500,000 blocks ... 1 million blocks is 20 years... so 500 million blocks would have been ten thousand years.
That's my point: using a block number will work for a very long time, but using a UNIX timestamp I'm not so sure about: it's a 32 bit counter, and it has a Year 2038 problem.

If you want to set a Locktime 25 years in the future, it's already not possible and you'll have to rely on future fixes (and assume the implementation will still work for you). That can be a very expensive mistake if it fails.
hero member
Activity: 787
Merit: 501
Thats 12-18 months too early based on previous @Halfin-ings and price.
copper member
Activity: 588
Merit: 351
Is block height the only variable that can be used to determine the “unlock” date or can months, years, etc also be used?

If only block heights, I think it would be very cool to release bonds based on the next few sets BTC halvings: 840k, 1.05m, and 1.26m. Possibly longer depending on interest from everyone.. Just an idea if it hasn’t already been mentioned  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1089
Smiley Received. Beta test on its way.



legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3158
Very nice yogg, eager to hear about the test results!

Minor thing I would change because I try to avoid big privacy intruding companies, is to get rid of the word Google. I believe something more neutral like ‘Search’ would be sufficient (and maybe Google does not exist anymore or rebranded when the transaction can and needs to be spend).


Edit some more minor things, do as you like Smiley

- Normally the ‘:’ has no space after the word Instructions (same for AuthKey: and S/N:)
- Sentence 1 misses a dot.
- Sentence 4 says ‘privkey’, but under the hologram it says ‘private key’.
- I would replace BTC for Bitcoin, mentioned 3 times.

Thanks much bitebits for the suggestions and pointing out a few things ! Smiley
I agree with you. "Search" is a much better term.

I didn't think much about the instructions . I just typed them and it was it. Grin
When the tests expire I'll be around anyway.
When making the test Cryptobonds, I thought it'd be better to have any kind of hints about what to do.
That's why it is as it is right now, I needed to get them the tests done and instead of nothing I chose this, and this was it.
Instructions will be be more elaborate for the release. They're only intended for the test as they are right now.
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 12081
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
Looks very good and very nice yogg, will follow as well  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2210
Merit: 3172
Flippin' burgers since 1163.
Very nice yogg, eager to hear about the test results!

Minor thing I would change because I try to avoid big privacy intruding companies, is to get rid of the word Google. I believe something more neutral like ‘Search’ would be sufficient (and maybe Google does not exist anymore or rebranded when the transaction can and needs to be spend).


Edit some more minor things, do as you like Smiley

- Normally the ‘:’ has no space after the word Instructions (same for AuthKey: and S/N:)
- Sentence 1 misses a dot.
- Sentence 4 says ‘privkey’, but under the hologram it says ‘private key’.
- I would replace BTC for Bitcoin, mentioned 3 times.
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
This is great, thanks again Yogg...

Now... Is there ANY Android app or widget for a simple/latest block number showing on my screen? Grin

Thanks!
copper member
Activity: 3892
Merit: 2197
Verified awesomeness ✔
Damn, those cards look like 🔥!
copper member
Activity: 588
Merit: 351
Yeah testers, plz do everything asap and ahead of schedule so the masses can get our fix  Grin AMAZING PREVIEW PICS!
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1089
Smiley My mail box is ready.

Nice looking Cryptobond cards.

legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3238
The Stone the masons rejected was the cornerstone.
Great job Yogg!

Looking forward to receiving mine
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
The test Cryptobonds are ready !
I really like how they turned out Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3158
Very confusing to call it a bond. Where's the income?
Are opendimes not considered physical bitcoin? idk

Hey Last of the V8s, thanks for your comment.
It's just a name and not really the exact equivalent of corporate/treasury bonds in custodial finance, but there's the same spirit of locking funds now to retrieve them later.
If "bitcoin" was an entity, among them all I think it would be the one I'd trust most as of today in our world.

Also there's no income, let it be positive or negative. Smiley
Negative interest rates for EU-govt equivalent of treasury bonds are a thing, so I think this can be a better savings alternative than a large range of instruments.



I imagine the market for these could, in due time, extend far beyond the current collector circles as an alternative to a CD. I, for one, would like to gift these to many young family members.  That said, I'm hoping production isn't overly limited. Care to share any insight regarding potential issuance?

Yes !
There are many many things to do with these, potentially. Smiley
In some way, Cryptobonds are "future BTC". We'll see Cheesy

I've been thinking about issuance, and I'm not ready to reply as of now yet.
Most certainly, there will be a Collectible release soon.



I hate to sound like those who i actually report but this is really an amazing project. But why do you keep it only in the collectables board? Not so many people come here, so it's very limited exposure, sure you share it with the guys you know fir testing, but projects like that should be on the first page, really.


Thanks a lot for your kind words iasenko, it is much appreciated ! I'm honored that you think Cryptobonds should be on the first page. Smiley
I think maybe to post about it in other places, to bring some attention on how the test unfolds. I'm rather confident.



I will send an update next week to every tester. Smiley

Thanks a lot everyone for your support ! I'm super happy that that the concept appeals to you all.



Bump with an update ! Smiley

The test Cryptobonds are ready !

They have been shipped all together in an expedited manner to Mantis Warehouse.
Each tester will receive his test Cryptobond most likely during next week.






As for the tests, each test Cryptobond is set to expire 144 blocks from each other.
Here's the full list of Cryptobonds and the Block number that has been set as an expiry time :

Serial NumberBlock ExpiryTester
1#622080Krogothmanhattan
2#622224Minerjones
3#622368Lesbian Cow
4#622512ChiBitCTy
5#622656Sat0shisGhost
6#622800Owlcatz
7#622944Jcga
8#623088Me (yogg)



These Cryptobonds shouldn't be spendable before the block that they're locked to hasn't made it to the BTC blockchain.

To all testers :
Please try to execute the Cryptobond before expiry time, see what happens. Smiley

Thanks a lot to everyone who accepted to test them Cryptobonds, please do redeem them when doable.
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 3002
Very confusing to call it a bond. Where's the income?
Are opendimes not considered physical bitcoin? idk

This is as close to a comparison as a bond as you're going to find in the collectibles space, so why not? I funded one of my Kialaras several years ago with the same thought in mind, it forces you to not spend the coins, which at the time I liked the concept because it reminded me of bonds.  Sure you're not necessarily guaranteed to earn interest, but TECHNICALLY bonds aren't either ( I realize the safest investment on the planet is US Treasury Bonds but it's not like they are backed by gold anymore).

The term physical bitcoin does not have a set in stone definition..and I've heard them being called physical bitcoins before. I guess you could also consider it a hardware wallet, but that term does not really fit perfectly either.

I hate to sound like those who i actually report but this is really an amazing project. But why do you keep it only in the collectables board? Not so many people come here, so it's very limited exposure, sure you share it with the guys you know fir testing, but projects like that should be on the first page, really.



I think it belongs here and I guess it could also fit in the wallets board, but where on the first page would this fit?



Yoggy- awesome project, look foroward to testing it out!
copper member
Activity: 3892
Merit: 2197
Verified awesomeness ✔
I hate to sound like those who i actually report but this is really an amazing project. But why do you keep it only in the collectables board? Not so many people come here, so it's very limited exposure, sure you share it with the guys you know fir testing, but projects like that should be on the first page, really.
As it's a limited (thus collectable) item, it belongs in this board. Otherwise you would need to report it for being in the wrong section. Tongue

...
Edit: hahah why the hell would you “report” it? Is that offensive to you? Cheesy
I'm pretty sure they mean that they would normal report people who just say "Amazing project". A lot of account farmers/spammers do it on altcoin announcements (and the like).
Pages:
Jump to: