Why is that shitty list is so important to you? Did you received your share? Yes? then be happy that you've got something for free.Now go and dump your coins.
They clearly stated that 3 million POST is reserved for the forum. If they wanted so, they would have dumped it their coins already on the market. They didn't dumped. I don't think that they were working several weeks for like 1 btc.
>> Did you received your share? Yes? then be happy that you've got something for free.
I am not part of the free distribution but I am an investor who makes money by trading - not by feeding on the free coins.
The funny part is now you also need that shitty list to verify if I am telling the truth, isnt it?
I want to do my due diligence before investing in any coin and I dont want the dev to dump his stash once I am bought into it.
So I need full transparency before I put my hard earned BTC into any coin.
If 3M is reserved for the forum, show the ledger for the remaining coin distribution.
The fact that the dev is ignoring these requests itself looks fishy for genuine investors.
I understand that you got your free share of the coins and just want to sell at a higher price.
Why is it so hard for the dev to produce the shitty list anyway?
Decred devs did not disclosed such a list either, just because of privacy protection. If they would release such a list they would break my privacy as i did not accepted when subscribing that my email address or even my btt account may be published. For me it is more than enough that in 1 month they did not achieved to distribute the whole amount that was dedicated for the distribution when other coins were getting 1000 "valid" applications in just 20 minutes. Those are the coins where you should look for fraud not those where in 1 month they got less than 1000 applications from the whole bitcointalk community. Couldn't be just easier from them to take the remaining 15 million instead of burning it?They had the possibility but still decided to burn it and that's a plausible thing.
Actual market conditions are prooving more than anything that the distribution was the fairest amongst the airdrop coins.
What you are asking is something that breaks the privacy protection terms and i would highly doubt that such a list will appear unless they want serious fud from those who do not agree with publishing their personal data
Are you serious?
I would like to know how the privacy is broken by showing such a list?
I am not asking for their home addresses here.
I have seen scams like this before and if you want to succeed, transparency is the first thing you need in crypto.
NO transparency NO investors. You guys can pump dump and die at yobit.
For those feeding on free coins, the list dont matter as its free easy money for them,
but for those who want to invest with their own BTC, this does matter my friend.
Here is some basic maths for you.
There is 30 pages posts here. Each page can have max of 20 posts.
Lets take the best case scenario all these 20 posts are by different people.
So total members shown interest is 30X20 = 600
If all of these 600 members have 500 posts each (which is again very high) means each member gets 5000 coins.
So the best case distribution happend is 600 X 5000 = 3,000,000 coins.
How much does the dev hold in this case, 12-3 =
9,000,000 coins.
Why not destroy 15M coins, its fun
Please dont try to put this scam behind some imaginary privacy rules dude.
Note: The total number of members applied is much less than 600 and the average number of posts by each member is like 250 or so.