Topic: 🚀[ANN][PoSToken]First PoS Smart Contract Token[Lending Platform Available] - page 46. (Read 348494 times)
March 28, 2018, 02:25:08 PM
is it possible that i get less tokens if i wait longer then 3 months (90 days ) with staking? , wasn't aware off that
March 28, 2018, 01:36:12 PM
or does he have no time to deal with the project? and dev can transfer the project to the community, to make the transition smoother?
can someone contact him directly?
can someone contact him directly?
March 28, 2018, 01:28:34 PM
Why does pos dev like to come online on bitcointalk but won't bother to say anything here. Has his account been hijacked or maybe he has been kidnapped
March 28, 2018, 12:20:06 PM
Now I just finished a project to write (a couple of days). I am looking for a community and a strong idea that now are dead to make it great. If there is will, everything is possible and POStoken is still the first pos token on ethereum network.
Would be nice if at least POStoken 2.0 were a swap so that people who invested at first do not lose out; also an actual desktop wallet where you can run the POS staking would be nice - would we have to load the whole bloated eth blockchain to run a PoStoken 2.0 wallet?
Also I recommend a PoS algorithm similar to the Bullion coin (CBX), they have the PoSP algo where only participants to securing the network get rewarded (allowing better income for participants as they also get the rewards from non-active wallets), I think this is how PoS should be. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bullion-cbx-the-digital-precious-metal-2019-roadmap-published-951753
March 28, 2018, 09:40:11 AM
Yes I am. By myself it could take a week or two, with a few more guys we can do it in days. All I want to see is a community open for something like this!
You mean you can create POStoken 2.0 from POStoken in a week or two? In such short time, there would not be much innovation; what matters for the value of the token is some level of innovation. How would it work - POStoken 2.0 would be a token swap?
Well, obviously not in a week or two. I can start working on it asap. I said one week or two as a general statement.
I am going to create a telegram channel where i will wait all of you to express your thoughts
i have some pos token on the lending platform but i did not try to withdraw them
maybe some day dev will return with some good updates or developments. or maybe not
Now I just finished a project to write (a couple of days). I am looking for a community and a strong idea that now are dead to make it great. If there is will, everything is possible and POStoken is still the first pos token on ethereum network.
March 28, 2018, 08:03:12 AM
Yes I am. By myself it could take a week or two, with a few more guys we can do it in days. All I want to see is a community open for something like this!
You mean you can create POStoken 2.0 from POStoken in a week or two? In such short time, there would not be much innovation; what matters for the value of the token is some level of innovation. How would it work - POStoken 2.0 would be a token swap?
Well, obviously not in a week or two. I can start working on it asap. I said one week or two as a general statement.
I am going to create a telegram channel where i will wait all of you to express your thoughts
i have some pos token on the lending platform but i did not try to withdraw them
maybe some day dev will return with some good updates or developments. or maybe not
March 28, 2018, 02:49:59 AM
Yes I am. By myself it could take a week or two, with a few more guys we can do it in days. All I want to see is a community open for something like this!
You mean you can create POStoken 2.0 from POStoken in a week or two? In such short time, there would not be much innovation; what matters for the value of the token is some level of innovation. How would it work - POStoken 2.0 would be a token swap?
Well, obviously not in a week or two. I can start working on it asap. I said one week or two as a general statement.
I am going to create a telegram channel where i will wait all of you to express your thoughts
March 27, 2018, 11:32:52 PM
Did any of the withdrawal from the lending platform go through in the last few days? Is there any chatter about the dev coming back?
March 27, 2018, 01:21:06 PM
Yes I am. By myself it could take a week or two, with a few more guys we can do it in days. All I want to see is a community open for something like this!
You mean you can create POStoken 2.0 from POStoken in a week or two? In such short time, there would not be much innovation; what matters for the value of the token is some level of innovation. How would it work - POStoken 2.0 would be a token swap?
March 27, 2018, 11:57:15 AM
With great respect to you.
In my subjective opinion, we should wait for DEV.
But we are confronted with the question, how long will we wait for it?
Nevertheless, no one bothers us to prepare for the seizure of the PoSToken2 project. (POSX-PoSTokenX)
None of us has encryption skills in ethereum networks.
1) We can start posting announcements about our problem in suitable sections for this, in this forum. (lack of developer on the ethereum smart)
And also you can start writing it in social networks.
We have a huge community, we can do it.
Perhaps we should turn to the ACC team - accelerator.network
2)Priority should be the return of tokens from the credit platform, at the expense of the owners, ie the transactions will be paid by us.
Confirmation of ownership will be TxHash to the address of the credit platform.
Grant access to the account, credit platform.
And also confirmation of ownership by e-mail specified in the credit platform account.
Nothing terrible will happen if we start preparing for the transition to the pos(2)-X
Since we will inevitably face many problems.
It's better to start making mistakes now.
It will be worse if we do not start preparing for it.
Subsequently, the community will be able to independently determine the motion vector POSX
Approve or reject this or that idea for the development of the project.
But maybe the developer will have their own worthwhile ideas.
We can arrange a vote 1-10 tokens on the address for the promotion of one or another branch of development, etc.
Sincerely.
PS
I do not have assets on the credit platform, but most importantly - do not create conditions for the separation of the community.
In my subjective opinion, we should wait for DEV.
But we are confronted with the question, how long will we wait for it?
Nevertheless, no one bothers us to prepare for the seizure of the PoSToken2 project. (POSX-PoSTokenX)
None of us has encryption skills in ethereum networks.
1) We can start posting announcements about our problem in suitable sections for this, in this forum. (lack of developer on the ethereum smart)
And also you can start writing it in social networks.
We have a huge community, we can do it.
Perhaps we should turn to the ACC team - accelerator.network
2)Priority should be the return of tokens from the credit platform, at the expense of the owners, ie the transactions will be paid by us.
Confirmation of ownership will be TxHash to the address of the credit platform.
Grant access to the account, credit platform.
And also confirmation of ownership by e-mail specified in the credit platform account.
Nothing terrible will happen if we start preparing for the transition to the pos(2)-X
Since we will inevitably face many problems.
It's better to start making mistakes now.
It will be worse if we do not start preparing for it.
Subsequently, the community will be able to independently determine the motion vector POSX
Approve or reject this or that idea for the development of the project.
But maybe the developer will have their own worthwhile ideas.
We can arrange a vote 1-10 tokens on the address for the promotion of one or another branch of development, etc.
Sincerely.
PS
I do not have assets on the credit platform, but most importantly - do not create conditions for the separation of the community.
Credit platform? Do you mean the Credits (CS) project which promises to investors/people to have a 1 million TPS? The project who still doesn't have its git?
If that's what you're referring to, the number 2 option would still be unthinkable considering the platform itself have its own problem to fix.
Nevertheless, it would be a great revival for POS if they can deliver.
And about the swap procedure.
And not as a prospect, but the withdrawal of tokens from it, by means of the above-mentioned paragraph 2.
For people who have tokens on the credit platform, how they could get them in the swap process.
They just have to pay the transaction and prove the right of ownership.
And of course they need to be active.
Since, the previous developer can switch to the image of a new developer.
And to abandon the idea of swap from the credit platform, thereby increasing the cost of the new token.
But if not, if DEV does not return, we could at least address the ACC-accelerator.network command.
I am willing to work on POSToken 2.0 plan as it was described. Knowledges are not an issue. The only issue is the funding that are needed. I am not willing to pay the costs from my own pocket, I think we can start this project from 0 again but with no funding it is pointless
You are developer? PoSToken community is pretty big, I guess we can do crowdfunding.
Yes I am. By myself it could take a week or two, with a few more guys we can do it in days. All I want to see is a community open for something like this!
March 27, 2018, 07:52:53 AM
With great respect to you.
In my subjective opinion, we should wait for DEV.
But we are confronted with the question, how long will we wait for it?
Nevertheless, no one bothers us to prepare for the seizure of the PoSToken2 project. (POSX-PoSTokenX)
None of us has encryption skills in ethereum networks.
1) We can start posting announcements about our problem in suitable sections for this, in this forum. (lack of developer on the ethereum smart)
And also you can start writing it in social networks.
We have a huge community, we can do it.
Perhaps we should turn to the ACC team - accelerator.network
2)Priority should be the return of tokens from the credit platform, at the expense of the owners, ie the transactions will be paid by us.
Confirmation of ownership will be TxHash to the address of the credit platform.
Grant access to the account, credit platform.
And also confirmation of ownership by e-mail specified in the credit platform account.
Nothing terrible will happen if we start preparing for the transition to the pos(2)-X
Since we will inevitably face many problems.
It's better to start making mistakes now.
It will be worse if we do not start preparing for it.
Subsequently, the community will be able to independently determine the motion vector POSX
Approve or reject this or that idea for the development of the project.
But maybe the developer will have their own worthwhile ideas.
We can arrange a vote 1-10 tokens on the address for the promotion of one or another branch of development, etc.
Sincerely.
PS
I do not have assets on the credit platform, but most importantly - do not create conditions for the separation of the community.
In my subjective opinion, we should wait for DEV.
But we are confronted with the question, how long will we wait for it?
Nevertheless, no one bothers us to prepare for the seizure of the PoSToken2 project. (POSX-PoSTokenX)
None of us has encryption skills in ethereum networks.
1) We can start posting announcements about our problem in suitable sections for this, in this forum. (lack of developer on the ethereum smart)
And also you can start writing it in social networks.
We have a huge community, we can do it.
Perhaps we should turn to the ACC team - accelerator.network
2)Priority should be the return of tokens from the credit platform, at the expense of the owners, ie the transactions will be paid by us.
Confirmation of ownership will be TxHash to the address of the credit platform.
Grant access to the account, credit platform.
And also confirmation of ownership by e-mail specified in the credit platform account.
Nothing terrible will happen if we start preparing for the transition to the pos(2)-X
Since we will inevitably face many problems.
It's better to start making mistakes now.
It will be worse if we do not start preparing for it.
Subsequently, the community will be able to independently determine the motion vector POSX
Approve or reject this or that idea for the development of the project.
But maybe the developer will have their own worthwhile ideas.
We can arrange a vote 1-10 tokens on the address for the promotion of one or another branch of development, etc.
Sincerely.
PS
I do not have assets on the credit platform, but most importantly - do not create conditions for the separation of the community.
Credit platform? Do you mean the Credits (CS) project which promises to investors/people to have a 1 million TPS? The project who still doesn't have its git?
If that's what you're referring to, the number 2 option would still be unthinkable considering the platform itself have its own problem to fix.
Nevertheless, it would be a great revival for POS if they can deliver.
And about the swap procedure.
And not as a prospect, but the withdrawal of tokens from it, by means of the above-mentioned paragraph 2.
For people who have tokens on the credit platform, how they could get them in the swap process.
They just have to pay the transaction and prove the right of ownership.
And of course they need to be active.
Since, the previous developer can switch to the image of a new developer.
And to abandon the idea of swap from the credit platform, thereby increasing the cost of the new token.
But if not, if DEV does not return, we could at least address the ACC-accelerator.network command.
I am willing to work on POSToken 2.0 plan as it was described. Knowledges are not an issue. The only issue is the funding that are needed. I am not willing to pay the costs from my own pocket, I think we can start this project from 0 again but with no funding it is pointless
You are developer? PoSToken community is pretty big, I guess we can do crowdfunding.
Yes I am. By myself it could take a week or two, with a few more guys we can do it in days. All I want to see is a community open for something like this!
March 27, 2018, 06:45:06 AM
Dev active yesterday but nothing to do
Just log in and sign out
Just log in and sign out
Didn't notice that. What is his intentions? Make us burn?
March 27, 2018, 06:10:45 AM
Dev active yesterday but nothing to do
Just log in and sign out
Just log in and sign out
March 27, 2018, 05:57:10 AM
With great respect to you.
In my subjective opinion, we should wait for DEV.
But we are confronted with the question, how long will we wait for it?
Nevertheless, no one bothers us to prepare for the seizure of the PoSToken2 project. (POSX-PoSTokenX)
None of us has encryption skills in ethereum networks.
1) We can start posting announcements about our problem in suitable sections for this, in this forum. (lack of developer on the ethereum smart)
And also you can start writing it in social networks.
We have a huge community, we can do it.
Perhaps we should turn to the ACC team - accelerator.network
2)Priority should be the return of tokens from the credit platform, at the expense of the owners, ie the transactions will be paid by us.
Confirmation of ownership will be TxHash to the address of the credit platform.
Grant access to the account, credit platform.
And also confirmation of ownership by e-mail specified in the credit platform account.
Nothing terrible will happen if we start preparing for the transition to the pos(2)-X
Since we will inevitably face many problems.
It's better to start making mistakes now.
It will be worse if we do not start preparing for it.
Subsequently, the community will be able to independently determine the motion vector POSX
Approve or reject this or that idea for the development of the project.
But maybe the developer will have their own worthwhile ideas.
We can arrange a vote 1-10 tokens on the address for the promotion of one or another branch of development, etc.
Sincerely.
PS
I do not have assets on the credit platform, but most importantly - do not create conditions for the separation of the community.
In my subjective opinion, we should wait for DEV.
But we are confronted with the question, how long will we wait for it?
Nevertheless, no one bothers us to prepare for the seizure of the PoSToken2 project. (POSX-PoSTokenX)
None of us has encryption skills in ethereum networks.
1) We can start posting announcements about our problem in suitable sections for this, in this forum. (lack of developer on the ethereum smart)
And also you can start writing it in social networks.
We have a huge community, we can do it.
Perhaps we should turn to the ACC team - accelerator.network
2)Priority should be the return of tokens from the credit platform, at the expense of the owners, ie the transactions will be paid by us.
Confirmation of ownership will be TxHash to the address of the credit platform.
Grant access to the account, credit platform.
And also confirmation of ownership by e-mail specified in the credit platform account.
Nothing terrible will happen if we start preparing for the transition to the pos(2)-X
Since we will inevitably face many problems.
It's better to start making mistakes now.
It will be worse if we do not start preparing for it.
Subsequently, the community will be able to independently determine the motion vector POSX
Approve or reject this or that idea for the development of the project.
But maybe the developer will have their own worthwhile ideas.
We can arrange a vote 1-10 tokens on the address for the promotion of one or another branch of development, etc.
Sincerely.
PS
I do not have assets on the credit platform, but most importantly - do not create conditions for the separation of the community.
Credit platform? Do you mean the Credits (CS) project which promises to investors/people to have a 1 million TPS? The project who still doesn't have its git?
If that's what you're referring to, the number 2 option would still be unthinkable considering the platform itself have its own problem to fix.
Nevertheless, it would be a great revival for POS if they can deliver.
And about the swap procedure.
And not as a prospect, but the withdrawal of tokens from it, by means of the above-mentioned paragraph 2.
For people who have tokens on the credit platform, how they could get them in the swap process.
They just have to pay the transaction and prove the right of ownership.
And of course they need to be active.
Since, the previous developer can switch to the image of a new developer.
And to abandon the idea of swap from the credit platform, thereby increasing the cost of the new token.
But if not, if DEV does not return, we could at least address the ACC-accelerator.network command.
I am willing to work on POSToken 2.0 plan as it was described. Knowledges are not an issue. The only issue is the funding that are needed. I am not willing to pay the costs from my own pocket, I think we can start this project from 0 again but with no funding it is pointless
You are developer? PoSToken community is pretty big, I guess we can do crowdfunding.
March 27, 2018, 04:22:24 AM
With great respect to you.
In my subjective opinion, we should wait for DEV.
But we are confronted with the question, how long will we wait for it?
Nevertheless, no one bothers us to prepare for the seizure of the PoSToken2 project. (POSX-PoSTokenX)
None of us has encryption skills in ethereum networks.
1) We can start posting announcements about our problem in suitable sections for this, in this forum. (lack of developer on the ethereum smart)
And also you can start writing it in social networks.
We have a huge community, we can do it.
Perhaps we should turn to the ACC team - accelerator.network
2)Priority should be the return of tokens from the credit platform, at the expense of the owners, ie the transactions will be paid by us.
Confirmation of ownership will be TxHash to the address of the credit platform.
Grant access to the account, credit platform.
And also confirmation of ownership by e-mail specified in the credit platform account.
Nothing terrible will happen if we start preparing for the transition to the pos(2)-X
Since we will inevitably face many problems.
It's better to start making mistakes now.
It will be worse if we do not start preparing for it.
Subsequently, the community will be able to independently determine the motion vector POSX
Approve or reject this or that idea for the development of the project.
But maybe the developer will have their own worthwhile ideas.
We can arrange a vote 1-10 tokens on the address for the promotion of one or another branch of development, etc.
Sincerely.
PS
I do not have assets on the credit platform, but most importantly - do not create conditions for the separation of the community.
In my subjective opinion, we should wait for DEV.
But we are confronted with the question, how long will we wait for it?
Nevertheless, no one bothers us to prepare for the seizure of the PoSToken2 project. (POSX-PoSTokenX)
None of us has encryption skills in ethereum networks.
1) We can start posting announcements about our problem in suitable sections for this, in this forum. (lack of developer on the ethereum smart)
And also you can start writing it in social networks.
We have a huge community, we can do it.
Perhaps we should turn to the ACC team - accelerator.network
2)Priority should be the return of tokens from the credit platform, at the expense of the owners, ie the transactions will be paid by us.
Confirmation of ownership will be TxHash to the address of the credit platform.
Grant access to the account, credit platform.
And also confirmation of ownership by e-mail specified in the credit platform account.
Nothing terrible will happen if we start preparing for the transition to the pos(2)-X
Since we will inevitably face many problems.
It's better to start making mistakes now.
It will be worse if we do not start preparing for it.
Subsequently, the community will be able to independently determine the motion vector POSX
Approve or reject this or that idea for the development of the project.
But maybe the developer will have their own worthwhile ideas.
We can arrange a vote 1-10 tokens on the address for the promotion of one or another branch of development, etc.
Sincerely.
PS
I do not have assets on the credit platform, but most importantly - do not create conditions for the separation of the community.
Credit platform? Do you mean the Credits (CS) project which promises to investors/people to have a 1 million TPS? The project who still doesn't have its git?
If that's what you're referring to, the number 2 option would still be unthinkable considering the platform itself have its own problem to fix.
Nevertheless, it would be a great revival for POS if they can deliver.
And about the swap procedure.
And not as a prospect, but the withdrawal of tokens from it, by means of the above-mentioned paragraph 2.
For people who have tokens on the credit platform, how they could get them in the swap process.
They just have to pay the transaction and prove the right of ownership.
And of course they need to be active.
Since, the previous developer can switch to the image of a new developer.
And to abandon the idea of swap from the credit platform, thereby increasing the cost of the new token.
But if not, if DEV does not return, we could at least address the ACC-accelerator.network command.
I am willing to work on POSToken 2.0 plan as it was described. Knowledges are not an issue. The only issue is the funding that are needed. I am not willing to pay the costs from my own pocket, I think we can start this project from 0 again but with no funding it is pointless
March 27, 2018, 02:49:06 AM
With great respect to you.
In my subjective opinion, we should wait for DEV.
But we are confronted with the question, how long will we wait for it?
Nevertheless, no one bothers us to prepare for the seizure of the PoSToken2 project. (POSX-PoSTokenX)
None of us has encryption skills in ethereum networks.
1) We can start posting announcements about our problem in suitable sections for this, in this forum. (lack of developer on the ethereum smart)
And also you can start writing it in social networks.
We have a huge community, we can do it.
Perhaps we should turn to the ACC team - accelerator.network
2)Priority should be the return of tokens from the credit platform, at the expense of the owners, ie the transactions will be paid by us.
Confirmation of ownership will be TxHash to the address of the credit platform.
Grant access to the account, credit platform.
And also confirmation of ownership by e-mail specified in the credit platform account.
Nothing terrible will happen if we start preparing for the transition to the pos(2)-X
Since we will inevitably face many problems.
It's better to start making mistakes now.
It will be worse if we do not start preparing for it.
Subsequently, the community will be able to independently determine the motion vector POSX
Approve or reject this or that idea for the development of the project.
But maybe the developer will have their own worthwhile ideas.
We can arrange a vote 1-10 tokens on the address for the promotion of one or another branch of development, etc.
Sincerely.
PS
I do not have assets on the credit platform, but most importantly - do not create conditions for the separation of the community.
In my subjective opinion, we should wait for DEV.
But we are confronted with the question, how long will we wait for it?
Nevertheless, no one bothers us to prepare for the seizure of the PoSToken2 project. (POSX-PoSTokenX)
None of us has encryption skills in ethereum networks.
1) We can start posting announcements about our problem in suitable sections for this, in this forum. (lack of developer on the ethereum smart)
And also you can start writing it in social networks.
We have a huge community, we can do it.
Perhaps we should turn to the ACC team - accelerator.network
2)Priority should be the return of tokens from the credit platform, at the expense of the owners, ie the transactions will be paid by us.
Confirmation of ownership will be TxHash to the address of the credit platform.
Grant access to the account, credit platform.
And also confirmation of ownership by e-mail specified in the credit platform account.
Nothing terrible will happen if we start preparing for the transition to the pos(2)-X
Since we will inevitably face many problems.
It's better to start making mistakes now.
It will be worse if we do not start preparing for it.
Subsequently, the community will be able to independently determine the motion vector POSX
Approve or reject this or that idea for the development of the project.
But maybe the developer will have their own worthwhile ideas.
We can arrange a vote 1-10 tokens on the address for the promotion of one or another branch of development, etc.
Sincerely.
PS
I do not have assets on the credit platform, but most importantly - do not create conditions for the separation of the community.
Credit platform? Do you mean the Credits (CS) project which promises to investors/people to have a 1 million TPS? The project who still doesn't have its git?
If that's what you're referring to, the number 2 option would still be unthinkable considering the platform itself have its own problem to fix.
Nevertheless, it would be a great revival for POS if they can deliver.
And about the swap procedure.
And not as a prospect, but the withdrawal of tokens from it, by means of the above-mentioned paragraph 2.
For people who have tokens on the credit platform, how they could get them in the swap process.
They just have to pay the transaction and prove the right of ownership.
And of course they need to be active.
Since, the previous developer can switch to the image of a new developer.
And to abandon the idea of swap from the credit platform, thereby increasing the cost of the new token.
But if not, if DEV does not return, we could at least address the ACC-accelerator.network command.
March 27, 2018, 02:19:54 AM
I really loved the idea of a PoS token, an ERC20 token that can earn interests, gains which are naturally proportional to the amount invested (you buy coin/token, instead of buying an expensive mining machine).
It would be nice if the dev of PoStoken would come back and be active on his own project, it WAS a great idea.
It would be nice if the dev of PoStoken would come back and be active on his own project, it WAS a great idea.
March 26, 2018, 04:50:49 PM
I think one lesson that can be learned from this is that any project that depends on one person is a bad project given the single point of failure. We have to remember that an advantage of blockchain technology is its distributed nature, so we must ask about the checks and balances when investing time or money in a project. In future cases, there should be assurances of a team or at least another person to take over if the primary person disappears. Besides abandonment, a developer can disappear due to an accident or death. There should be someone to take over. That, in hindsight, is the biggest lesson here.
Yeah you have a good point. I have learnt my lesson. A one man dev team is not a good idea to invest in. A solid project should have many devs and better if they are known and not anonymous.
March 26, 2018, 02:40:45 PM
All we've been hearing is a community take over but do we have an applicable technical guy here who have a high interest on continuing the PoSToken project?
If there is, I could at least give my hand on web development/web designing, though I'm not familiar on ethereum contract coding.
If there is, I could at least give my hand on web development/web designing, though I'm not familiar on ethereum contract coding.
"community takeover" is a nice concept, but unless there are tech guys in the community which get involved and they know what they are doing, "community takeover" is only a mantra which gets repeated hoping that the mere act of repeating it would be sufficient to do the miracle of resurrecting a dying project. Without some serious tech guy getting on board, any "community takeover" is just a tribal dance around the fire where the project is burning, in the hope that the dance alone will do the mircale.
Really nice metaphor there. I am of similar mind regarding community takeover. It is all well on paper but reality is that things get done much faster and better if you have a guy in charge and able development team under his payroll.
March 26, 2018, 02:35:12 PM
Hello everybody. Dear developers, please explain what happens to the coin. You plan to further develop the coin. Thanks for the answer. Good luck to all.
Want some news iam giving you. No news about Postoken since more than 2 months, Many people got stuck at platform still not receiving they withdraw and the developer already offline more than 2 month Jump to: