Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][PRE-ICO] FidelityHouse - 🔥 Where your Content become Tokens 🔥 - page 33. (Read 85332 times)

jr. member
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
Users will finally be able to share their interests and find new friends in one place. This is a great service, I liked the idea of ​​this project!

This is a very difficult project, because it is difficult to implement a product that will be of interest to all people who have completely different interests.

I think that developers do not need to keep in mind all the hobbies of people, as people themselves will fill this platform!
newbie
Activity: 196
Merit: 0
Users will finally be able to share their interests and find new friends in one place. This is a great service, I liked the idea of ​​this project!

This is a very difficult project, because it is difficult to implement a product that will be of interest to all people who have completely different interests.
newbie
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
Users will finally be able to share their interests and find new friends in one place. This is a great service, I liked the idea of ​​this project!
newbie
Activity: 196
Merit: 0
What is the goal set by the developers? What are they talking about the future of their product and project as a whole? Is there such information in the public domain? I am interested to know these facts

Our mission is to become a reference platform for authors and publishers of original and high-quality content, offering services aimed at their attribution, protection and monetization.

I think that if developers at the early stages set themselves similar goals, then in the future the project will be successful against the background of other projects. It is interesting. I will follow you!

Taking advantage of the new technological paradigm, it is possible to make the management of the life cycle of content more equitable and transparent, design and certify the relationship between the author and the publisher.

Yes, it is tempting. And I liked this fact: FidelityHouse is the first publisher to choose this innovative approach that uses blockchain technology.
newbie
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
What is the goal set by the developers? What are they talking about the future of their product and project as a whole? Is there such information in the public domain? I am interested to know these facts

Our mission is to become a reference platform for authors and publishers of original and high-quality content, offering services aimed at their attribution, protection and monetization.

I think that if developers at the early stages set themselves similar goals, then in the future the project will be successful against the background of other projects. It is interesting. I will follow you!

Taking advantage of the new technological paradigm, it is possible to make the management of the life cycle of content more equitable and transparent, design and certify the relationship between the author and the publisher.
newbie
Activity: 196
Merit: 0
What is the goal set by the developers? What are they talking about the future of their product and project as a whole? Is there such information in the public domain? I am interested to know these facts

Our mission is to become a reference platform for authors and publishers of original and high-quality content, offering services aimed at their attribution, protection and monetization.

I think that if developers at the early stages set themselves similar goals, then in the future the project will be successful against the background of other projects. It is interesting. I will follow you!
jr. member
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
What is the goal set by the developers? What are they talking about the future of their product and project as a whole? Is there such information in the public domain? I am interested to know these facts

Our mission is to become a reference platform for authors and publishers of original and high-quality content, offering services aimed at their attribution, protection and monetization.
full member
Activity: 183
Merit: 101

Hello FidelityHouse  Team,
Congratulations! There is excellent news for you. Your ICO FidelityHouse https://coindelite.com/ico-details-fidelityhouse- is now listed on one of the most prominent ICO listing (ICO Calendar) -  CoinDelite.com. 

Your project has been reviewed and rated by our experts and has got a rating of

Notice:  Trying to get property of non-object in /var/www/html/dashboard/pages/ico-update.php on line 499

 out of 5. You can request edit access or write to us to claim any changes.
           
Your rating widget code is available at https://coindelite.com/widgets.
           
Our Telegram channel has 100k plus subscribers (https://t.me/coindelite); you may want to share your ICO there and promote your ICO.  To get in touch with us, you may write to us at [email protected] or contact Garry on Telegram (@Garry_x).
           
Best wishes,

Team CoinDelite
       
newbie
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
What is the goal set by the developers? What are they talking about the future of their product and project as a whole? Is there such information in the public domain? I am interested to know these facts
member
Activity: 220
Merit: 10
That is, I, as an author, can in the future get the right to moderate some content? If this is how it works then it is interesting in terms of personal growth.

I also think that this is quite logical and correct. If a person has earned a certain reputation, then he can be considered as one who is well versed in the matter.
I understand that the authors will receive some money from advertising after publication, but whether there will be some profit from the moderators, they won’t work for nothing.

Naturally, moderators also participate in the monetization of content and receive 5% of each article approved by them, so it is beneficial for them to be responsible in their work.
And if for some reason the moderator did his job poorly and the content is published? What awaits the moderator in this case?

I can not say what will happen in this case, but I think that some sanctions or restrictions will be applied to this moderator in the future. In addition, this situation is extremely unrealistic, I think.
jr. member
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
That is, I, as an author, can in the future get the right to moderate some content? If this is how it works then it is interesting in terms of personal growth.

I also think that this is quite logical and correct. If a person has earned a certain reputation, then he can be considered as one who is well versed in the matter.
I understand that the authors will receive some money from advertising after publication, but whether there will be some profit from the moderators, they won’t work for nothing.

Naturally, moderators also participate in the monetization of content and receive 5% of each article approved by them, so it is beneficial for them to be responsible in their work.
And if for some reason the moderator did his job poorly and the content is published? What awaits the moderator in this case?
member
Activity: 220
Merit: 10
That is, I, as an author, can in the future get the right to moderate some content? If this is how it works then it is interesting in terms of personal growth.

I also think that this is quite logical and correct. If a person has earned a certain reputation, then he can be considered as one who is well versed in the matter.
I understand that the authors will receive some money from advertising after publication, but whether there will be some profit from the moderators, they won’t work for nothing.

Naturally, moderators also participate in the monetization of content and receive 5% of each article approved by them, so it is beneficial for them to be responsible in their work.
jr. member
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
That is, I, as an author, can in the future get the right to moderate some content? If this is how it works then it is interesting in terms of personal growth.

I also think that this is quite logical and correct. If a person has earned a certain reputation, then he can be considered as one who is well versed in the matter.
I understand that the authors will receive some money from advertising after publication, but whether there will be some profit from the moderators, they won’t work for nothing.
member
Activity: 220
Merit: 10
That is, I, as an author, can in the future get the right to moderate some content? If this is how it works then it is interesting in terms of personal growth.

I also think that this is quite logical and correct. If a person has earned a certain reputation, then he can be considered as one who is well versed in the matter.
jr. member
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
That is, I, as an author, can in the future get the right to moderate some content? If this is how it works then it is interesting in terms of personal growth.
newbie
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
I don’t understand who the moderators are and what role do they play in the whole ecosystem of this project? I understand that they are practically the most significant people, am I right?

You are not quite right, the most significant people are the authors, the project team emphasizes this. Moderators only make their assessment of new content.
Yes, but the outcome of this assessment is whether the content is published or not published, which is why I say that they are the most important people in this project.

Moderators are only intended to evaluate, this is their task. If it is possible to skip any content of any kind, then in the end the whole platform will be disguised in the trash. Content should always be moderated by competent people.
Very interesting facts. I hope that developers as often as possible will delight their community with interesting facts about actual information about their project and its success!
newbie
Activity: 242
Merit: 0
I don’t understand who the moderators are and what role do they play in the whole ecosystem of this project? I understand that they are practically the most significant people, am I right?

You are not quite right, the most significant people are the authors, the project team emphasizes this. Moderators only make their assessment of new content.
Yes, but the outcome of this assessment is whether the content is published or not published, which is why I say that they are the most important people in this project.

Moderators are only intended to evaluate, this is their task. If it is possible to skip any content of any kind, then in the end the whole platform will be disguised in the trash. Content should always be moderated by competent people.
But how can I know that these people are really competent in this matter? Who will these moderators be and what is their motivation?
The consolidated experience of the Italian project, the born zero marketing budget, thanks to the unique performance along with important recognition, will become one of the leading sites in Italy with 750 million page views per year in a few years.

I think the moderators will be experienced authors who will be considered experts in some areas, perhaps some of the moderators will be hired, I do not know.
newbie
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
I don’t understand who the moderators are and what role do they play in the whole ecosystem of this project? I understand that they are practically the most significant people, am I right?

You are not quite right, the most significant people are the authors, the project team emphasizes this. Moderators only make their assessment of new content.
Yes, but the outcome of this assessment is whether the content is published or not published, which is why I say that they are the most important people in this project.

Moderators are only intended to evaluate, this is their task. If it is possible to skip any content of any kind, then in the end the whole platform will be disguised in the trash. Content should always be moderated by competent people.
But how can I know that these people are really competent in this matter? Who will these moderators be and what is their motivation?
The consolidated experience of the Italian project, the born zero marketing budget, thanks to the unique performance along with important recognition, will become one of the leading sites in Italy with 750 million page views per year in a few years.
jr. member
Activity: 140
Merit: 1
I don’t understand who the moderators are and what role do they play in the whole ecosystem of this project? I understand that they are practically the most significant people, am I right?

You are not quite right, the most significant people are the authors, the project team emphasizes this. Moderators only make their assessment of new content.
Yes, but the outcome of this assessment is whether the content is published or not published, which is why I say that they are the most important people in this project.

Moderators are only intended to evaluate, this is their task. If it is possible to skip any content of any kind, then in the end the whole platform will be disguised in the trash. Content should always be moderated by competent people.
But how can I know that these people are really competent in this matter? Who will these moderators be and what is their motivation?
newbie
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
What is the main main idea of ​​this project? I was told that the main feature is the creation of a unique platform for a large number of people all over the world!

Today, FidelityHouse is a social content network that allows users to update their own interests, publish content that earns on views.

I think it will be interesting for many of us, because most people have their own hobbies and everyone likes to find new acquaintances with people who are passionate about such ideas.
Pages:
Jump to: