Topic: [ANN][🔥PRE - ICO OPEN🔥] LUST: DECENTRALIZED SEX MARKETPLACE WITH ESCROW! - page 47. (Read 91727 times)
August 26, 2017, 09:43:04 PM
Another interesting point for me - how compatible is anonymity and a meeting in real life with a prostitute?
August 26, 2017, 09:22:13 PM
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
The more the team works on the project, the better the finished product goes. In the meantime, it seems interesting, but half-ready
Inaccuracies in matters of legality - this does not mean that the project is not ready. To represent the legality of the platform, you need a good team of lawyers
The lawyers definitely miss this team ...
Does that make sense? Spending money on lawyers, when it is not yet clear, are users interested in this platform?
Any project related to crypto currency needs lawyers
August 26, 2017, 09:21:51 PM
TO THOSE OF YOU NOT LOGGED ON INTO BITCOINTALK, 85% OF THE PROFILE YOU SEE CHATTING WITH EACH OTHER ON THIS THREAD HAS A NEGATIVE TRUST, THAT MEANS ITS BEEN DEEM A PROFILE UTILIZED FOR SCAM AND SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED. YOU HAVE TO BE LOGGED ON IN OTHER TO SEE THE RED NEGATIVE TRUST, SO PLZ DON'T BE FOOLED BY THIS CONVERSATION BTW ACCOUNTS, THAT MIGHT CREATE AN ILLUSION THAT THEIR IS INTEREST IN THIS ICO. 65-70% OF THE POST ON THIS THREAD IS ORCHESTRATED BY SOMEONE USING STOLEN ACCOUNTS TO CHAT BTW DIFFERENT ACCOUNT. THE PROOF IS ON A THREAD BELOW THIS BANNER. DO A DILIGENT RESEARCH BEFORE YOU WASTE YOUR MONEY.
Save your money because you are going to be fleeced.
Proof:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lust-ico-is-a-scam-2077842
Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.
A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake
August 26, 2017, 09:20:37 PM
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
The more the team works on the project, the better the finished product goes. In the meantime, it seems interesting, but half-ready
Inaccuracies in matters of legality - this does not mean that the project is not ready. To represent the legality of the platform, you need a good team of lawyers
The lawyers definitely miss this team ...
Does that make sense? Spending money on lawyers, when it is not yet clear, are users interested in this platform?
At a minimum, this would demonstrate the integrity of the development team
August 26, 2017, 09:19:48 PM
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
The more the team works on the project, the better the finished product goes. In the meantime, it seems interesting, but half-ready
Inaccuracies in matters of legality - this does not mean that the project is not ready. To represent the legality of the platform, you need a good team of lawyers
The lawyers definitely miss this team ...
Does that make sense? Spending money on lawyers, when it is not yet clear, are users interested in this platform?
August 26, 2017, 09:18:50 PM
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
The more the team works on the project, the better the finished product goes. In the meantime, it seems interesting, but half-ready
Inaccuracies in matters of legality - this does not mean that the project is not ready. To represent the legality of the platform, you need a good team of lawyers
The lawyers definitely miss this team ...
August 26, 2017, 09:14:16 PM
TO THOSE OF YOU NOT LOGGED ON INTO BITCOINTALK, 85% OF THE PROFILE YOU SEE CHATTING WITH EACH OTHER ON THIS THREAD HAS A NEGATIVE TRUST, THAT MEANS ITS BEEN DEEM A PROFILE UTILIZED FOR SCAM AND SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED. YOU HAVE TO BE LOGGED ON IN OTHER TO SEE THE RED NEGATIVE TRUST, SO PLZ DON'T BE FOOLED BY THIS CONVERSATION BTW ACCOUNTS, THAT MIGHT CREATE AN ILLUSION THAT THEIR IS INTEREST IN THIS ICO. 65-70% OF THE POST ON THIS THREAD IS ORCHESTRATED BY SOMEONE USING STOLEN ACCOUNTS TO CHAT BTW DIFFERENT ACCOUNT. THE PROOF IS ON A THREAD BELOW THIS BANNER. DO A DILIGENT RESEARCH BEFORE YOU WASTE YOUR MONEY.
Save your money because you are going to be fleeced.
Proof:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lust-ico-is-a-scam-2077842
Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.
A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake
August 26, 2017, 09:10:11 PM
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
The more the team works on the project, the better the finished product goes. In the meantime, it seems interesting, but half-ready
Inaccuracies in matters of legality - this does not mean that the project is not ready. To represent the legality of the platform, you need a good team of lawyers
August 26, 2017, 09:08:26 PM
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
The more the team works on the project, the better the finished product goes. In the meantime, it seems interesting, but half-ready
August 26, 2017, 09:05:56 PM
In fact, absolutely no one can calculate everything, no matter how hard they tried. Therefore, it is not worth talking about any mistakes, you would not do better in their place
August 26, 2017, 09:04:53 PM
TO THOSE OF YOU NOT LOGGED ON INTO BITCOINTALK, 85% OF THE PROFILE YOU SEE CHATTING WITH EACH OTHER ON THIS THREAD HAS A NEGATIVE TRUST, THAT MEANS ITS BEEN DEEM A PROFILE UTILIZED FOR SCAM AND SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED. YOU HAVE TO BE LOGGED ON IN OTHER TO SEE THE RED NEGATIVE TRUST, SO PLZ DON'T BE FOOLED BY THIS CONVERSATION BTW ACCOUNTS, THAT MIGHT CREATE AN ILLUSION THAT THEIR IS INTEREST IN THIS ICO. 65-70% OF THE POST ON THIS THREAD IS ORCHESTRATED BY SOMEONE USING STOLEN ACCOUNTS TO CHAT BTW DIFFERENT ACCOUNT. THE PROOF IS ON A THREAD BELOW THIS BANNER. DO A DILIGENT RESEARCH BEFORE YOU WASTE YOUR MONEY.
Save your money because you are going to be fleeced.
Proof:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lust-ico-is-a-scam-2077842
Be wise, there is a reason the active accts all have negative trust. And it's the same accts chatting with themselves Stolen/ bought accts. the proof is under the banner.
A picture is worth more than a thousand words. Their original post till one of the admin acct was discovered as fake
August 26, 2017, 09:04:40 PM
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
It's okay, everything is for a good project
It still has to become a good project. For 9 days, they collected only 30% of the required amount
Do you think that this is not enough for such a period?
The amount definitely could be more, because the project is ambitious
The team needs at least 200k to collect, it's too early to talk about a larger amount
No, I mean, by this time the team had to collect half the amount needed
I think there can still be an element of randomness here. A large investor may not immediately come across this project
What kind of randomness can there be, if the money is at stake?
August 26, 2017, 08:52:23 PM
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
It's okay, everything is for a good project
It still has to become a good project. For 9 days, they collected only 30% of the required amount
Do you think that this is not enough for such a period?
The amount definitely could be more, because the project is ambitious
The team needs at least 200k to collect, it's too early to talk about a larger amount
No, I mean, by this time the team had to collect half the amount needed
I think there can still be an element of randomness here. A large investor may not immediately come across this project
August 26, 2017, 08:51:32 PM
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
It's okay, everything is for a good project
It still has to become a good project. For 9 days, they collected only 30% of the required amount
Do you think that this is not enough for such a period?
The amount definitely could be more, because the project is ambitious
The team needs at least 200k to collect, it's too early to talk about a larger amount
No, I mean, by this time the team had to collect half the amount needed
August 26, 2017, 08:50:43 PM
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
It's okay, everything is for a good project
It still has to become a good project. For 9 days, they collected only 30% of the required amount
Do you think that this is not enough for such a period?
The amount definitely could be more, because the project is ambitious
The team needs at least 200k to collect, it's too early to talk about a larger amount
August 26, 2017, 08:48:03 PM
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
It's okay, everything is for a good project
It still has to become a good project. For 9 days, they collected only 30% of the required amount
Do you think that this is not enough for such a period?
The amount definitely could be more, because the project is ambitious
August 26, 2017, 08:47:21 PM
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
It's okay, everything is for a good project
It still has to become a good project. For 9 days, they collected only 30% of the required amount
Do you think that this is not enough for such a period?
August 26, 2017, 08:45:09 PM
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
It's okay, everything is for a good project
It still has to become a good project. For 9 days, they collected only 30% of the required amount
August 26, 2017, 08:43:13 PM
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
It's okay, everything is for a good project
August 26, 2017, 08:42:00 PM
In fact, it's quite inconvenient. Not everyone stores savings in ETH
Jump to: