Interesting that the coin network is operational:
- network speed is about 0.5 GH/s
- blocks are generated steadily, no long delays between the blocks
- halving stage was successful
- soon must be POS stage
If another developer or team take up this project - it would be great
Topic: [ANN][PWR] POWERCOIN - Distributed Computing made easy [NOW TRADING] - page 30. (Read 145761 times)
July 12, 2016, 12:43:05 AM
July 11, 2016, 04:45:30 AM
Dev go back on PWR! .
Last Active: June 15, 2016, 01:03:57 PM. very sad,but I still hope he comeback with a great news
July 11, 2016, 04:32:33 AM
when launching wallet on windows 7, msvcr120.dll installed
it launches &than instantly "The program has requested the runtime to terminate in an unusual manner"
there should be a way to ignore the error and force it to keep running???
it launches &than instantly "The program has requested the runtime to terminate in an unusual manner"
there should be a way to ignore the error and force it to keep running???
July 11, 2016, 03:47:14 AM
Dev go back on PWR! .
July 10, 2016, 10:19:59 PM
Ive seen abandoned coins resurrect from the dead with a new dev team.
nope, not this time, here is pwr Dev new coin, join airdrop party : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crxchronoscoin-pos-now-penny-auction-site-launched-dividends-on-chain-1544723 July 09, 2016, 03:41:23 PM
Ive seen abandoned coins resurrect from the dead with a new dev team.
nope, not this time, here is pwr Dev new coin, join airdrop party : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crxchronoscoin-pos-now-penny-auction-site-launched-dividends-on-chain-1544723 
July 07, 2016, 01:34:26 PM
Ive seen abandoned coins resurrect from the dead with a new dev team.
That's what I am hoping for. I don't hold a LOT ... but the concept was interesting.
It seems like the most natural method to monitize the web. Just 'rent' out cpu/cycles.
July 07, 2016, 02:14:16 AM
Ive seen abandoned coins resurrect from the dead with a new dev team.
July 06, 2016, 08:07:30 PM
POS started? My wallet is no unlocked for POS production
pos will start after block 86000i was thinking just like a concept of ponzi early holders wins and the rest will cry and accused being scammed.
July 06, 2016, 06:13:42 PM
POS started? My wallet is no unlocked for POS production
pos will start after block 86000
July 06, 2016, 04:29:13 PM
POS started? My wallet is no unlocked for POS production
pos will start after block 86000
July 06, 2016, 02:26:59 PM
POS started? My wallet is no unlocked for POS production
pos will start after block 86000 July 06, 2016, 01:19:11 PM
POS started? My wallet is no unlocked for POS production
July 06, 2016, 12:19:51 PM
That's the wrong coin. Here is the correct one. You'll be even more disappointed. https://yobit.net/en/trade/PWR/BTC
July 06, 2016, 10:35:02 AM
July 06, 2016, 10:33:14 AM
I see the thread was quite lively so did another escrow handle it? The last page does not look like it ended well so I wonder what happened.
Your contract might have changed the dev mind about doing an ICO (the true goal being to scam people). This coin was airdropped within a few hours timeframe. Most of it was probably just taken by the dev himself. Once listed on an exchange, the price held for a few days before sinking to the bottom. The dev probably “earned” a few BTC by selling all of his stash during these days, and then disappeared.Only want to know if I need to keep track of ICO-requests and if I could have done anything to protect potential investors without hurting a legit ICO.
There were no signs of this going the wrong way?
I don't think many people bought this coin. The thread activity was probably generated by the initial beneficiaries of the airdrop, hoping for a pump in order to cash out.There were no signs of this going the wrong way?
This project smelled fishy to me from the start. The “roadmap” was very very thin, merely a short list with random goals. Every aspect of the project was made very hastily, and without substance. How it would end was written all over it, IMHO.
Anyway, congrats for being so dedicated to prevent scams around here!
I'm sure he kept a lot of the airdrop. The powerclient beta testing post was the final pump so he could dump the rest. Shady guy.
July 06, 2016, 10:31:14 AM
guys, its july ^^ summer beach etc
July 06, 2016, 10:29:25 AM
Dev is inactive on BCT for 3+ weeks now...
Name: Petersen
Posts: 97
Activity: 70
Position: Member
Date Registered: April 09, 2016, 04:38:21 PM
Last Active: June 15, 2016, 01:03:57 PM
Name: Petersen
Posts: 97
Activity: 70
Position: Member
Date Registered: April 09, 2016, 04:38:21 PM
Last Active: June 15, 2016, 01:03:57 PM
July 05, 2016, 07:55:24 PM
I see the thread was quite lively so did another escrow handle it? The last page does not look like it ended well so I wonder what happened.
Your contract might have changed the dev mind about doing an ICO (the true goal being to scam people). This coin was airdropped within a few hours timeframe. Most of it was probably just taken by the dev himself. Once listed on an exchange, the price held for a few days before sinking to the bottom. The dev probably “earned” a few BTC by selling all of his stash during these days, and then disappeared.Only want to know if I need to keep track of ICO-requests and if I could have done anything to protect potential investors without hurting a legit ICO.
There were no signs of this going the wrong way?
I don't think many people bought this coin. The thread activity was probably generated by the initial beneficiaries of the airdrop, hoping for a pump in order to cash out.There were no signs of this going the wrong way?
This project smelled fishy to me from the start. The “roadmap” was very very thin, merely a short list with random goals. Every aspect of the project was made very hastily, and without substance. How it would end was written all over it, IMHO.
Anyway, congrats for being so dedicated to prevent scams around here!
July 05, 2016, 05:26:12 PM
I'm cleaning up old unused escrow addresses and found that I have an old address for the PWR-Coin-ICO I created on May 12th. Petersen asked me for it but it looks like he did not react anymore when I sent him my standard ICO contract.
I see the thread was quite lively so did another escrow handle it? The last page does not look like it ended well so I wonder what happened.
Only want to know if I need to keep track of ICO-requests and if I could have done anything to protect potential investors without hurting a legit ICO.
There were no signs of this going the wrong way?
I see the thread was quite lively so did another escrow handle it? The last page does not look like it ended well so I wonder what happened.
Only want to know if I need to keep track of ICO-requests and if I could have done anything to protect potential investors without hurting a legit ICO.
There were no signs of this going the wrong way?
Jump to: