Author

Topic: [ANN][Q2C] QubitCoin new secure hashing (CPU/GPU) (NEW) Update 0.8.4.1 - page 118. (Read 351528 times)

sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
"Proof-of-Asset Protocol"
http://qbt.mine-pool.net/

What happened with them I lost a lot of money thinking theyre up.

Sorry, some problem with connect ...
now work fine ...
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 251
http://qbt.mine-pool.net/

What happened with them I lost a lot of money thinking theyre up.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0

Quote
I'm sorry but you're pretty much talking and not enough doing!

I have no desire to carry on a conversation about the code and the more indulge in the code with a man who on this forum has two post for all time. To me, you spam the user yet!

Sorry!

Thanks krecu for you for your clarification.

Thanks to the earlier poster advising me that the KGW is only relevant to scrypt-based hashing, that was next on my stack and you're right, I embarrassed myself by not holding my horses until I understood the details better.

Good luck.

Cheers,

Graham


newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Quote

you think now mining very complex and we need use KGW?

Maybe...

I guess you didn't get/read my PM. Not an opinion, fact. There's lots of evidence if you're looking.

https://bitcoil.co.il/pool_analysis.pdf

http://organofcorti.blogspot.co.il/

The mooncoin community also knows it as a fact.

http://www.reddit.com/r/MoonCoin/comments/1x2gon/why_does_the_difficulty_on_pools_takes_forever_to/
http://www.reddit.com/r/MoonCoin/comments/1wne3e/official_we_are_working_on_the_muchdemanded/

Are you aware of the above?

Actually, I'm far more concerned by the potential impact on users:

Quote
"My mining has dropped to almost nothing each day, can't wait for this gravity well implementation."

Quote
"I was finally able to have some fun mining a coin with my laptop and poof, its basically dead until the devs fix it."

But, it's not quite a no-brainer, see the cut'n'pasteable implementation in the fedoracoin codebase and the comments by the mooncoin developer.

https://github.com/fedoracoin/fedoracoin/commit/9102b387506acb230b65fd463f88119b348d6701

http://www.reddit.com/r/MoonCoin/comments/1wwfco/official_232014_gravity_well_progress_update/

He has my sympathies:

http://www.reddit.com/r/MoonCoin/comments/1x37j1/official_urgent_appeal_we_need_windowsmac_wallet/

And, as krecu has observed, 0 pre-mine means 0 $ in the kittty to fund this kind of thing. And, that's where "just not good enough" starts to come in.

PC-only binaries of demos, using code which has not been committed to the existing public github repos. I think that's misconceived - it's not transparent, it's completely opaque. Has the code been tested? Where's the continuous integration logs? There are alternative ways of demonstrating progress that will serve the community better than punting out preliminary PC binaries.

Punt out the Linux code first, then you've immediately got other, informed eyeballs on the source code. That's a lot of work you must have got through ...

According to my reading of the commit logs, the current QubitCoin source code remains largely unchanged from the original qubitcoin clone (of the lightcoin codebase) which was made at the end of August/beginning of Sept last year:

https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/4be9f4d40ea4bd40cf1c99649f1d613a28bb33e1

To summarise, the Jan 12 release of the Qubitcoins code was developed on a git clone of litecoin's codebase and then augmented by a copy'n'pasta addition of Max Guevara's addition of automatic checkpointing (clearly borrowed by Max from the ppcoin team's original code, the comments reveal all).

https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quark/commit/79c3190f111cd97cfa653c382417499c1614948c

At the time of writing this post, that particular commit is around 3/4 of the way down to the bottom of page 3 of the paginated list litecoin commits.

https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commits/master-0.8?page=3

If you take a look at the fedoracoins codebase, you can see that their dev team is keeping pace with litecoin fixes/basic_enhancements as well as making some eminently borrowable improvements of their own, which, if applied to the QubitCoin code, would directly benefit the community. That's how it's supposed to work., that's how it works everywhere else I've been and there's nothing special about this project to make it an exception.

So, as far as I can tell, the QubitCoins codebase is about six months behind litecoin/fedoracoin/dogecoin/uncletomcobleyandallcoin, so all those subsequent improvements (key-handling, coincontrol, kgw, qt4+5, greater resistance to attack, et.c) are missing from the QubitCoins codebase.

I'm surprised to have to beat the open source drum here: one enormous advantage of the open-source system is not having to re-invent the wheel and commits with compelling titles such as "Fix QT5 compatibility for Coin Control" are simply gifts from one's colleagues, it would appear churlish to ignore them.

With the aid of the litecoin/fedoracoin teams' changelogs, I've been trying to unpick the strands of the changes so that I can separate out the inapplicable scrypt-based material from the qubithash-based material and have been broadly partitioning it out into different branches.

https://github.com/gjhiggins/QubitCoin

That's my repos. I'm Graham Higgins, btw. If anyone wants to exchange notes, observations, etc, you can email me on [email protected]

https://www.bel-epa.com/gjh/
https://www.ohloh.net/accounts/gjhiggins

Does anyone else see a ludicrous incongruity in using pseudonyms in open source cryptocurrency work? Transparency is as transparency does.

So, given the now rapidly-ageing codebase, I hope you'll forgive me rudely asking a direct question - do you welcome PRs to the repos? What is the procedure for applying for commit privs to the official repos?

Cheers,

Graham

- GRAHAMx5hmAyhznHXg8AfGK7cbDzJyuokU
hero member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 535
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
"Proof-of-Asset Protocol"



Dear community!!!

*******************************************

Thank you for your support in the development of coins! All funds destined for promotional and etc. go to destination!

I would be happy if you're a little backed developer Q2C: GR1PUJR3BCfMA6Crpuz3gXoR9aFwcv4rnD  Smiley

Very thanks!

*******************************************




http://mine-pool.net/qubit/
Donate - 10 k

thanks for coin Smiley
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0



Dear community!!!

*******************************************

Thank you for your support in the development of coins! All funds destined for promotional and etc. go to destination!

I would be happy if you're a little backed developer Q2C: GR1PUJR3BCfMA6Crpuz3gXoR9aFwcv4rnD  Smiley

Very thanks!

*******************************************


newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Diff: 2819.07600455    Grin Grin Grin


legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
Quote
It's not full release, only simple update, full release in february!


Quote
it's not release and not time to update git source, with release will update all

Given the recent efforts to get Q2C listed on exchanges and significantly raise
its visibility, I'd be interested to know whether the upcoming release includes
an implementation of Kimoto's Gravity Well?


Cheers,

- GRAHAMx5hmAyhznHXg8AfGK7cbDzJyuokU

you think now mining very complex and we need use KGW?

Maybe...



why would q2c need kgw ... wtf....



it is made to prevent mutlipools from making diff stuck high .... do u get it that this is not scrypt !
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000


*********************************************************

Dear community!!!

Simple updated wallet for windows:
- created windows installed wizard
- auto add rules for firewall
- auto create config file with stable node
- update icon, load page

download here - http://www.q2c.cc/qbit_win_32_v.0.8.3.zip

before install, please backup you wallet file (wallet.dat)

It's not full release, only simple update, full release in february!

*********************************************************



source code seems was not updated on github...

it's not release and not time to update git source, with release will update all

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4895208
 Wink
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Quote
It's not full release, only simple update, full release in february!


Quote
it's not release and not time to update git source, with release will update all

Given the recent efforts to get Q2C listed on exchanges and significantly raise
its visibility, I'd be interested to know whether the upcoming release includes
an implementation of Kimoto's Gravity Well?


Cheers,

- GRAHAMx5hmAyhznHXg8AfGK7cbDzJyuokU

you think now mining very complex and we need use KGW?

Maybe...
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Quote
It's not full release, only simple update, full release in february!


Quote
it's not release and not time to update git source, with release will update all

Given the recent efforts to get Q2C listed on exchanges and significantly raise
its visibility, I'd be interested to know whether the upcoming release includes
an implementation of Kimoto's Gravity Well?


Cheers,

- GRAHAMx5hmAyhznHXg8AfGK7cbDzJyuokU
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
I downloaded the new wallet, but it just dont want to sync at all. Added nodes and all the stuff, still no sync

Same issue here.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
[ANN]

https://www.cryptorush.in added Q2C in 24 hours!

Very good news for us, thank you krecu!  Wink
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Jump to: