Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][Q2C] QubitCoin new secure hashing (CPU/GPU) (NEW) Update 0.8.4.1 - page 17. (Read 351541 times)

legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
Hmm, a sr member reporting a similar experience of low power consumption with Deepcoin, a Peter Bushnell fresh fork of 0.8.x changed to use qubit:

In and mining. Power consumption is very nice. Using less than any other algo available thus far.

Another useful datum point to reference.

Cheers

Graham
wgd
legendary
Activity: 1815
Merit: 1005
real qubit is the only one still bravely drifting on the ocean altcoins !!  Shocked
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Let´s clone back ... (if Xryptbit has some new useful code).
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
Qubitcoin clone coming out: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-xbit-xryptbit-xryptclean-coming-soon-722102

Xryptbit is a new crytocurrency that uses the Qubit algorithm (Luffa, Cubehash, Shavite, Simd and Echo) proving to be more secure and energy efficient than X11/X13/X15 consuming 15-20% less power.
full member
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
Graham,

Any news about development plan?

legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice
i disagree ....

...
also we could contact MYR coin ... for making Deepcoin with MYR merged mining

Ooooo, Mary, Mary quite contrary Smiley


Cheers

Graham
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice


i disagree ....



Because?
sr. member
Activity: 244
Merit: 250
i love to mine qubit via myriad, i would love it even more to get qubitcoins out of it Smiley

especially since the Qubit team and community continues to hold steady despite hard times.

honestly i think it may be a win-win for both parties
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice
i disagree ....

Ha ha, very funny. You're already mining qubit via myriad ...

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8027265

so I guess you're leg-pulling/trolling.

(Well, I did enourage people to post Smiley)

Cheers

Graham

hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice


i disagree ....



May i ask why? Do you not want your coin to have an increase in network security?. Do you not want your coin to have better profitability?. Do you not want more devs helping your coin with essential features?
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice


i disagree ....

legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice

I know from experience that the QubitCoin community is not shy about raising objections (c.f. other erstwhile devs' proposals), so if there aren't any raised, we can reasonably assume broad agreement.

Unless anyone feels like organising a vote thread in the interests of improved transparency --- or even, possibly, representational responsibility?

It's not an especially demanding task, community respect and fame beckons, plus an opportunity to publish a donation address (I'm confident that this resurgent community will appreciate an opportunity to demonstrate solidarity of purpose).


Cheers

Graham (currently stacked out)

hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Bitrated user: ahmedbodi.
I will make a Merged Mining Hard Fork Patch. If its accepted then i will add Qubitcoin to PolyMyr if not then thats your choice
wgd
legendary
Activity: 1815
Merit: 1005
https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_q2c ekhem? XD

DING on 128 sat

penambang gjhiggins thx,

there you can see how many people did not move their coins from the time of extraction. Potentially you can think of the number of coins in circulation is a lot less than the declared MAX MONEY

legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
gjhiggins you are able to carry out analysis of addresses, and rank them by size of the q2c capital
You mean like this?
Code:
https://coinplorer.com/Q2C/Addresses/0/Top

Yes, except we need all the wallet addresses that have a transaction recorded somewhere in the blockchain, i.e. received or sent Q2C at some point.

Note: only those wallet addresses/accounts that have been referenced in a transaction recorded in the blockchain can be identified for possible retention.

Cheers

Graham
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Lets bring this coin back to daily trading and usage! I think we need to get this on Bittrex and/or Mintpal
hero member
Activity: 548
Merit: 501
gjhiggins you are able to carry out analysis of addresses, and rank them by size of the q2c capital
You mean like this?
Code:
https://coinplorer.com/Q2C/Addresses/0/Top
wgd
legendary
Activity: 1815
Merit: 1005
gjhiggins you are able to carry out analysis of addresses, and rank them by size of the q2c capital

I'll certainly have a go, I'll take a look this evening at what's involved. It's just a matter of calculating the residual balance of all the txIns and txOuts to each address, isn't it?

Cheers,

Graham

As for predicting address rich lists
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1290
gjhiggins you are able to carry out analysis of addresses, and rank them by size of the q2c capital

I'll certainly have a go, I'll take a look this evening at what's involved. It's just a matter of calculating the residual balance of all the txIns and txOuts to each address, isn't it?

Cheers,

Graham
wgd
legendary
Activity: 1815
Merit: 1005
gjhiggins you are able to carry out analysis of addresses, and rank them by size of the q2c capital
Pages:
Jump to: