Topic: [ANN][QTL] Quatloo, A DarkWaveGravity Scrypt Coin Mandatory UPDATE to v1.2.1 - page 13. (Read 408494 times)
December 26, 2016, 05:29:02 PM
Hi everyone, I have developed an arbitrage trader (Bittrex & Poloniex) based on similar logic of Quatloo trader. I'm busy with the ping pong partion and hope to have this finished soon. It makes some money for me at the moment. There's no UI yet but should be simple to add. The database design are quite rock solid. I may consider a commercial version if there are lots of interest. Let me know your thoughts.
December 23, 2016, 10:59:02 AM
Just wondering if anyone has bothered to try out the source ? Or even just check it out
December 17, 2016, 08:56:01 AM
I have uploaded the Q-node code for users to asses.
Please do so, and tell me what you think the collateral should be.
Qnode source
Please do so, and tell me what you think the collateral should be.
Qnode source
December 15, 2016, 05:18:34 AM
I will work on adding Q-nodes on a separate branch over the next two days. Is there a functional block explorer out there ?
this is the sort of thing that needs to be in the original post
here you go:
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Quatloo/
also mining pool:
http://pool.hashnova.com/pools/Quatloo/QTL/
Great, should have an update soon.
December 15, 2016, 01:13:39 AM
I will work on adding Q-nodes on a separate branch over the next two days. Is there a functional block explorer out there ?
this is the sort of thing that needs to be in the original post
here you go:
https://prohashing.com/explorer/Quatloo/
also mining pool:
http://pool.hashnova.com/pools/Quatloo/QTL/
December 15, 2016, 12:43:31 AM
I will work on adding Q-nodes on a separate branch over the next two days. Is there a functional block explorer out there ?
December 14, 2016, 03:31:40 PM
Q-nodes + Q-trader = Triskelion
Q-trader has been around for 2 years, no?
December 14, 2016, 03:27:47 PM
Q-nodes + Q-trader = Triskelion
December 14, 2016, 02:37:22 PM
MarKus the dev has always wanted it to be scrypt POW only, and the b.r. is pretty low and decreases every 2 years so it really doesn't need to be messed with. The big selling point of this coin was the QTL trader tool/bot, and it doesn't work with Poloniex anymore, and Cryptsy is gone, so only works with Bittrex. I have talked briefly to MarKus a couple times over the last year and he said he was going to fix the Poloniex bug in the trader, the price spikes up, and then he doesn't take the freaking 10 minutes to do it and goes awol for 6 months again. I really don't get him, because before that he was always honest and got things done in a timely fashion. Then his real job made him work 60hrs a week and he sold and gave away all his premine so I guess he lost interest. But I wouldn't change a thing other than DGW update and trying to get him to fix the trader, lol
^^ what he said
QTL trader BOT is the source code you want to get your hands on.
The Viking was working on QTL trader with Markus the dev before Markus went AWOL
Vikings twitter is: https://twitter.com/fyrstikken
and a video he made about QTL Trader: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOCQBECcZhM
Yes the block reward is pretty low, I do not intend to mess with it, rather just make it clearer. Conflicting information is never a good thing. Especially since i am updating the code to match almost 4 years worth of development, many things will need to be made extra crystal clear so there is no confusion.
With regards to PoW, the more i think on it , the stronger the arguments for adding merged mining.
Low PoW reward means most miners will avoid it unless there is a pump, but having a merged mining pool would result in regular blocks regardless.
It's really up to users.
Just want to point out that the website could be better....loads better.
Would you please try to contact these guys and get the source code for the trader? It would be a great start, but also, having just the one selling point won't be enough.
edit:- I intend to have multiple vps with pools and block explores setup and paid for for years in advance.
The only benefit with this coin was the trader. It was cheap and had some flaws but it worked for a short while.
Good luck with retriving the source code from them. I dont think that will happen without paying them.
There is an open source Qt trader in circulation. Push come to shove , we could adapt it.
I have tested open a source qt trader that was freeware. It was good. Probably the same you have seen.
December 14, 2016, 03:32:38 AM
I have a copy of the last version available of Quatloo Trader 2.3
Is clean but always remember use an antivirus, download at your own risk
Right now only works on Bittrex, you need 3000 QTL to have access to trade, arbitrage doesnt work right now because this bot dont work on Poloniex.
I hope it helps, the file will be available for 30 days, if anyone needs the bot after i can upload it again.
https://ufile.io/d2635
Is clean but always remember use an antivirus, download at your own risk
Right now only works on Bittrex, you need 3000 QTL to have access to trade, arbitrage doesnt work right now because this bot dont work on Poloniex.
I hope it helps, the file will be available for 30 days, if anyone needs the bot after i can upload it again.
https://ufile.io/d2635
Great, thank you. That is the windows version though. If anyone can get their hands on the source code, we can get moving.
I've uploaded the updated Quatloo client here :- https://github.com/BlockMechanic/quatloo-0.13 . it still needs extensive testing and a solution for the nBits issue, but it syncs just fine now. Once everything is ironed out, maybe we can make a windows and mac versions.
December 14, 2016, 03:00:40 AM
I have a copy of the last version available of Quatloo Trader 2.3
Is clean but always remember use an antivirus, download at your own risk
Right now only works on Bittrex, you need 3000 QTL to have access to trade, arbitrage doesnt work right now because this bot dont work on Poloniex.
I hope it helps, the file will be available for 30 days, if anyone needs the bot after i can upload it again.
https://ufile.io/d2635
Is clean but always remember use an antivirus, download at your own risk
Right now only works on Bittrex, you need 3000 QTL to have access to trade, arbitrage doesnt work right now because this bot dont work on Poloniex.
I hope it helps, the file will be available for 30 days, if anyone needs the bot after i can upload it again.
https://ufile.io/d2635
December 14, 2016, 01:18:09 AM
Did this coin ever use KGW?
December 13, 2016, 09:55:18 PM
MarKus the dev has always wanted it to be scrypt POW only, and the b.r. is pretty low and decreases every 2 years so it really doesn't need to be messed with. The big selling point of this coin was the QTL trader tool/bot, and it doesn't work with Poloniex anymore, and Cryptsy is gone, so only works with Bittrex. I have talked briefly to MarKus a couple times over the last year and he said he was going to fix the Poloniex bug in the trader, the price spikes up, and then he doesn't take the freaking 10 minutes to do it and goes awol for 6 months again. I really don't get him, because before that he was always honest and got things done in a timely fashion. Then his real job made him work 60hrs a week and he sold and gave away all his premine so I guess he lost interest. But I wouldn't change a thing other than DGW update and trying to get him to fix the trader, lol
^^ what he said
QTL trader BOT is the source code you want to get your hands on.
The Viking was working on QTL trader with Markus the dev before Markus went AWOL
Vikings twitter is: https://twitter.com/fyrstikken
and a video he made about QTL Trader: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOCQBECcZhM
Yes the block reward is pretty low, I do not intend to mess with it, rather just make it clearer. Conflicting information is never a good thing. Especially since i am updating the code to match almost 4 years worth of development, many things will need to be made extra crystal clear so there is no confusion.
With regards to PoW, the more i think on it , the stronger the arguments for adding merged mining.
Low PoW reward means most miners will avoid it unless there is a pump, but having a merged mining pool would result in regular blocks regardless.
It's really up to users.
Just want to point out that the website could be better....loads better.
Would you please try to contact these guys and get the source code for the trader? It would be a great start, but also, having just the one selling point won't be enough.
edit:- I intend to have multiple vps with pools and block explores setup and paid for for years in advance.
The only benefit with this coin was the trader. It was cheap and had some flaws but it worked for a short while.
Good luck with retriving the source code from them. I dont think that will happen without paying them.
There is an open source Qt trader in circulation. Push come to shove , we could adapt it.
December 13, 2016, 09:09:54 PM
This chain is a messy 
I'd like to standardize everything if possible. Seems the old client would allow mixing of block versions.
Code:
2016-12-14 01:59:37 ERROR: AcceptBlock: bad-cb-height, block height mismatch in coinbase (code 16)
2016-12-14 01:59:37 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED
I'd like to standardize everything if possible. Seems the old client would allow mixing of block versions.
December 13, 2016, 03:37:24 PM
MarKus the dev has always wanted it to be scrypt POW only, and the b.r. is pretty low and decreases every 2 years so it really doesn't need to be messed with. The big selling point of this coin was the QTL trader tool/bot, and it doesn't work with Poloniex anymore, and Cryptsy is gone, so only works with Bittrex. I have talked briefly to MarKus a couple times over the last year and he said he was going to fix the Poloniex bug in the trader, the price spikes up, and then he doesn't take the freaking 10 minutes to do it and goes awol for 6 months again. I really don't get him, because before that he was always honest and got things done in a timely fashion. Then his real job made him work 60hrs a week and he sold and gave away all his premine so I guess he lost interest. But I wouldn't change a thing other than DGW update and trying to get him to fix the trader, lol
^^ what he said
QTL trader BOT is the source code you want to get your hands on.
The Viking was working on QTL trader with Markus the dev before Markus went AWOL
Vikings twitter is: https://twitter.com/fyrstikken
and a video he made about QTL Trader: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOCQBECcZhM
Yes the block reward is pretty low, I do not intend to mess with it, rather just make it clearer. Conflicting information is never a good thing. Especially since i am updating the code to match almost 4 years worth of development, many things will need to be made extra crystal clear so there is no confusion.
With regards to PoW, the more i think on it , the stronger the arguments for adding merged mining.
Low PoW reward means most miners will avoid it unless there is a pump, but having a merged mining pool would result in regular blocks regardless.
It's really up to users.
Just want to point out that the website could be better....loads better.
Would you please try to contact these guys and get the source code for the trader? It would be a great start, but also, having just the one selling point won't be enough.
edit:- I intend to have multiple vps with pools and block explores setup and paid for for years in advance.
The only benefit with this coin was the trader. It was cheap and had some flaws but it worked for a short while.
Good luck with retriving the source code from them. I dont think that will happen without paying them.
December 13, 2016, 02:40:55 PM
What happened to quatloo trader, does it still require 20K deposit to enable arb
December 13, 2016, 02:31:14 PM
Not sure if it's me or the original dev, but something about PoW doesn't add up. the genesis has nBits == 0x1e0ffff0 but when you try to verify it, it should come up as 0x1e0fffff. this is what was preventing the new client from syncing.
I've made a temporary work around, but I will investigate further . Meanwhile it's syncing pretty well.
I've made a temporary work around, but I will investigate further . Meanwhile it's syncing pretty well.
Code:
{
"version": 130100,
"protocolversion": 70014,
"walletversion": 130000,
"balance": 0.00000000,
"blocks": 1274,
"timeoffset": 0,
"connections": 7,
"proxy": "",
"difficulty": 148.3164185437957,
"testnet": false,
"keypoololdest": 1481636748,
"keypoolsize": 100,
"paytxfee": 0.00000000,
"relayfee": 0.00100000,
"errors": ""
}
December 13, 2016, 08:43:08 AM
I would surely run a Q-node. Will it be like a coin mixer such as Dash like?
Running master nodes would get a lot of QTL off the exchanges.
Really like what DNET is doing with its master nodes http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/darknet/ (I am holding and running a DNET MN)
Running master nodes would get a lot of QTL off the exchanges.
Really like what DNET is doing with its master nodes http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/darknet/ (I am holding and running a DNET MN)
December 13, 2016, 08:29:40 AM
Nice, sent ya some.
Im for Q-nodes, used to like messing around with darkcoin(dash) masternodes.
great, let's get a few more replies, then we can decide. currently compiling new source based on bitcoin 0.13 Im for Q-nodes, used to like messing around with darkcoin(dash) masternodes.
You should probably start a new thread cause the original post lists wrong block explorer
I think i will start one once I have successfully synced and tested the new client. Meanwhile, Would be nice if long time community members also had their say with regards to my actions and suggestions. As well as contacting the exchanges to get their position on the updates.
Are you for or against the possible addition of custom Q-Nodes ?
Jump to: