Topic: [ANN][RATING] Digital Rating Agency (ICOs, cryptocurrencies): launching - page 7. (Read 2450 times)

Founders of Lala World are developing a new ecosystem, which would allow to provide financial services and technologies to those people who nowadays do not have any access to banking products and services.

Lala World Team has strong end experienced participants and well-known consultants. The intention of the team to develop such a system is unquestionable. Fraud Rate of the project can be assessed as Low.

On the other hand, taking into consideration the strict regulatory rules of the modern cryptocurrency system, we are questioning the ability of team members to implement some of their plans within the current project.

The full report is coming soon.

Thank you!

Please find information about our rating process below:

https://medium.com/@digitalratings/about-how-and-why-we-evaluate-ico-cryptocurrency-projects-bf8a319eeb74

You can order a rating review via our official mail [email protected]

Decentralized platform for building value virtual communities based on events.

Event organizers, within the framework of the platform, are given the opportunity to organize their "bounty programs" to motivate participants to promote them. Those who buy a ticket on the kickcity platform also receive a reward for using the platform in the form of KCY tokens. In addition, the option of event-crowdfunding is laid. The goal is the creation of value online communities that monetize information within it with real values (in this case, KCY tokens).

Another interesting attempt to make a symbiosis of Facebook, Slack, and Telegram using blockchain. "The basis of the platform" - smart KCY tokens on the Bancor protocol. Its value will directly depend on the ability of the team to find permanent partners among the major players of the industry, as well as on involving the participants in the project.

Despite the fact that it is the first team's attempt to implement the blockchain project, they managed to assemble a good pool of advisers, that includes world-class experts. However, there is information that raises questions, in particular, contact information and addresses. Connection with the real sector (event-industry) requires a significant amount of cash flow, that creates additional risks for investors in the legal field of the Russian Federation and other countries.

The full report is coming soon.

I think COMSA ICO is scam. They have fake DEV members.

This is good service. Can i sent you some ICO program for you to review ?

The DigRate team has assigned A2 rating score of investment attractiveness to Playkey project: medium-to-high probability of investment return, considerable sensitivity to market environment.

Playkey – cloud gaming provider – is planning to conduct an ICO on November 1st with the intent of exponentially accelerating the pace of cloud gaming development through decentralization. The aim is to provide gamers with a reasonably-priced opportunity to play top-rated games anytime and anywhere, using any device connected to Internet, without having to purchase a high-end PC or console.

Playkey has been providing services in the cloud gaming field for four years. The team has extensive experience and the necessary skills to construct a business model. Playkey.io - the next stage of the company's development, can bring it to the international arena.

The price of the token directly depends on demand for the company’s services. Therefore, the profitability of the investment depends on the decisions made by the team, on the marketing strategy and many other factors.

More details about the factors that affect the investment attractiveness of the project can be found in our report.
http://digrate.com/uploads/ico_report/Playkey_eng.pdf

The DigRate team has assigned A2 rating score of investment attractiveness to BioCoin project, launched by the farm cooperative LavkaLavka: medium-to-high probability of investment return, considerable sensitivity to market environment.

BioCoin sets itself the global goal of uniting farms and companies that promote the principles of green economy into a single platform based on an international loyalty system. The undoubted advantage of the project is its social orientation, as well as the ability to use BIO tokens immediately after the acquisition. We conducted a detailed analysis of BioCoin and described all the pros and cons that are still present in the project.

The DigRate team reminds that investments in any crypto asset content high risk in it.
http://digrate.com/uploads/ico_report/BioCoin_ENG.pdf

The Bitclave project team was able to give clear answers to our analysts' questions, to present the project with excellence, to convince us of the deep understanding of the topic and the ability to implement the announced project, as well as making it in demand. They also have raised $16.5M during pre-sale and are actively working in the US market.

We congratulate the team with the highest rating and wish them great success. But remember, everyone who participates in crowdfunding should be aware of risks. Be reasonable and you will succeed.

http://digrate.com/uploads/ico_report/Bitclave_eng_6d3szu3.pdf

The GoldMint project (Fraud Rate High, B2 rating score of investment attractiveness - low development potential, highly speculative investments) extended its ICO for another 20 days.

The project states that it raised $ 6 million (a little more than 10% of the desired amount of $ 49 million), so, as real purchases of external investors we can uniquely identify funds in the amount of $ 2.5 million only (about 5% of the of the declared limit). Lack of liquidity will be a big problem for investors when the funds announced in the project, which bought tokens at a price probably much lower than the current offering, will begin to make profit.

Contrary to the very professional and powerful PR, the crypto community agreed with our evaluation of the project. It's great!

Digital Rating Agency has assigned "B1" rating score of investment attractiveness to MicroMoney project: Considerable risk exposure, high sensitivity to market conditions.

The issuance of loans to the population is a highly competitive segment where competitors can be banks, microfinance organizations, mobile operators and even search engines and social networks. Online lending with automatic scoring has been around for a long time and has its own pros and cons. The MicroMoney project team believes that it will be able to work much better than the market as a whole.

Advantages of the ICO are the availability of the core expertise of the team, productive PR-campaign, Advisory Board, and interesting investors. The main disadvantage is the absence of an obvious need for a decentralized system and tokens, as well as the low profitability of the credit business.

More details in our report.
http://digrate.com/uploads/ico_report/MicroMoney_ENG.pdf

Thank you for your question. We have our rating scale wich includes Fraud Rate. We assign an estimate Fraud Rate after we have quite full understanding aroud the project but (usually) several days befor investment attractivnes  report release. We match some reasons about  Fraud Rate when it's published but  more complete description of our conclusions are inside investment attractivnes report

very helpful for beginners who are new to crypto world, especially for investors who want to invest in ico.
but I want to ask, how can you declare that a project is a fraud? is there a particular reason?

DigRate has assigned "B1" rating score of investment attractiveness to Robomed Network project: Considerable risk exposure, high sensitivity to market conditions.

Robomed Network - is a medical network managed by a blockchain tokens and designed to provide the most effective medical care. The Robomed Network ecosystem connects healthcare service providers and patients on the basis of a smart contract, the value criteria of which are the performance metrics of a specific medical service and satisfaction of patient.

The Company will have to face different health systems and completely different legal framework in different countries, with the problem of access to personal data of patients. For example, in the US, this industry is extremely conservative and regulated. Most likely, the Company simply will not be able to work with medical centers because of legislative restrictions.
Whether medical centers will agree to the conditions offered to them by the Company is a controversial issue at this stage.
The future growth of tokens is expected to be secured by the growth of the Company's turnover, which can provide investors with a potential profit.

See detailed description of risks in our report.
http://digrate.com/uploads/ico_report/Robomed_ENG.pdf

There are not so many projects where you can talk about a full (or at leat some) technical expertise. You don't need to be genius to look through standart smart contrats and uniq code things are quite rare at the moment

Not now, but one of evolution way in the future

Nice project. Are you going to offer a technical analysis of the ICO contracts?

In the opinion of the Digital Rating Agency team, XRONOS is a perfect example of a project that combines a wide range of fraud signs in it.

According to the official website, "XRONOS is an aggregator of cryptocurrency and blockchain-technologies. XRONOS target is to create the first truly stable cryptocurrency." We identified several alarm signs, on the basis of which we reached conclusions on the low investment attractiveness of the project:

1. Guaranteed profitability. The promise of profitability above the bank deposit is a serious reason to think about the sources of this income. The multiple profit guarantee is a clear sign of fraudulent projects.

2. Questionable social networks profiles. The vast majority of participants' accounts are closed and don't contain a mention of the project.

3. A language mix for making the project meaningful. Part of the text, including Terms & Conditions, isn't translated into Russian, while the main website content is translated, and the team itself obviously has Russian roots and attracts funding among the Russian-speaking audience.

4. The team hasn't been in contact to answer our questions.

5. Complex words and constructions, whereas all the same can be described much easier and more clearly, can be a sign of deliberate complication of the perception, which is not very good for investors.

6. A small number of subscribers in social networks.

7. Considerable discrepancies in the text on the website and the laid out documents. For example, on the website's Terms & Conditions we couldn't find the promised guaranteed profitability, moreover, there is a complete disclaimer of liability.

Among the advantages, there are stylish pictures on Facebook, the presence of Edgar Otchenshenko in the team, whose Facebook page is more like the living one, and the fascinating White Paper.

The DigRate team highlighted this project because of advertising in Yandex.Direct, which, in our opinion, is aimed at the least informed users. The Digital Rating Agency recommends thinking carefully before investing in such assets and assessing all the risks. ICO with signs of fraud, buying advertising placements, will always cause the DigRate team increased interest. We will sensitize the public to projects that pursue the goal of enrichment by inexperienced investors. In our opinion, the listed facts are sufficient to assign ratings without a more detailed express report. According to the collective opinion of Digital Rating Agency, the investment attractiveness rating of the XRONOS is "C" - low investment attractiveness, high default risk in the short term. Fraud Rate Scam.

This evaluation expresses the view of Digital Rating Agency and is not a fact-finding or recommendation to buy, hold or sell those or other assets, make investment decisions. We do not blame anyone for fraudulent actions, but we express our opinion about high risks. Digital Rating Agency assumes no responsibility for any consequences, interpretations, conclusions, recommendations or other actions directly or indirectly related to the evaluation performed by DigRate?s rating actions, as well as the observations and conclusions contained in the rating report and press releases, or absence of all of the above. The only source that reflects the current state of assessments is the official website www.digrate.com.

DigRate team congratulates crypto.tickets on the ICO start and reports that has assigned "A2" rating score to the project. Medium-to-high probability of investment return, considerable sensitivity to market environment.

The crypto.tickets is a project building a blockchain ecosystem that will change the mass event ticket sales market. For the time being, the global ticket industry faces the everyday problems, such as: speculation on the secondary ticket market, fakes and fraud, incomplete sale of tickets and lack of a common standard for the return of tickets. These are the main topics of all industry conferences around the world.

As founders promise, the blockchain technology will solve these problems forever, simplify the market parties’ intercommunications and provide transparency of all ticket transactions. The company claims that it will solve the problem of the lack of mutual trust as all transactions are made in blockchain and all relations are controlled by smart contracts.

Tokens of the Project have the potential for significant growth due to the architecture of the ecosystem, in which each ticket purchased for fiat currency in the Tickets Cloud and other ticket systems. Through the back-end it will be organized as a request to purchase the required number of TKT tokens on the exchange. However, the motivation of companies selling tickets to receive payment in TKT tokens is not clear at the moment. Moreover, their motivation to instantly exchange TKT for fiat currency threatens the economic stability of the crypto.tickets system and the future value increase of tokens.

Read our recommendations on project improvement in the report. Let's get ready for the crypto-party!
http://digrate.com/uploads/ico_report/Crypto_Tickets_eng.pdf

We have enough experience in evaluating investment attractiveness of other financial institutions, however our reports express just opinion of our experts. It can't be treated as the strong recommendation to buy or sell anything, it's up to you. We just provide some additional information you can use or ignore.

You do not have a quality agency with unknown specialists. How do you prove that your ratings are not corrupt?