Topic: [ANN]ROUND - CS:GO Competitive platform! ROUND IS WORKING! CHECK IT NOW! - page 96. (Read 90744 times)
November 19, 2016, 10:07:31 AM
This is a hybrid platform and what's good about this is that it prioritize e-sports. I suggest not just to create their own game then funded it. Sometimes, dota players like me just love to watch a game of my favorite international team and just like the other sports betting site i think that it is a thing that you should discuss as well.
November 19, 2016, 06:14:01 AM
12 sat, cheap, min=max= 100 btc, interesting, never seen so funny before. 
November 19, 2016, 06:02:23 AM
Interesting project I'm in.
When will you release the whitepaper?
When will you release the whitepaper?
November 18, 2016, 07:01:21 AM
I love liqui so I love ROUND. Good luck guys
November 18, 2016, 05:30:51 AM
An agreement was reached with Round project dev team (roundcoin.org), that Liqui Exchange will act as ICO Round organizer. ICO will be set up in format "sell wall" of 840 million ROUND tokens by fixed price 0.00000012. The collected funds will be transferred to Liqui’s escrow address https://blockchain.info/address/1E4r8MLnRW5v151eg2RvLKGX4ZTSG5DfAy and will be realized to developers only after tokens will be distributed to ICO participants.
Disclaimer! Liqui Exchange is in no way affiliated with Round project development team, all investments risks each participant fully assumes by himself.
We wish the guys from Round successful ICO.
Disclaimer! Liqui Exchange is in no way affiliated with Round project development team, all investments risks each participant fully assumes by himself.
We wish the guys from Round successful ICO.
November 17, 2016, 08:43:04 PM
So they have persuaded you, finally
Not sure if it is right or wrong decision, but it completely changes the game, and lets you collect money before doing anything, as opposed to your initial plan of earning money after doing things. The ICO is a "trend" now. You could even replace "before" with "instead of", if you decide so, like it is often done in crypto ICO world
. So... why not? Remember, with ICO you are stepping on a path with big temptations involved, any make yourself vulnerable to people asking/telling unpleasant things. I would really prefer to see an honest team earning from a real work done.
Anyway, recheck the numbers in picture above. There is a zero lost somewhere. With existing numbers of price and supply you aim for 1008 BTC, not 100 .
November 17, 2016, 04:26:00 PM
Now it becomes more interesting for sure.
November 17, 2016, 06:29:40 AM
November 16, 2016, 04:54:30 PM
Nice! Will be watching for updates.
November 16, 2016, 04:20:41 PM
Round team decided to distribute tokens via ICO. Maximum ICO amount - 100 BTC. All additional information will be available tomorrow. We already sent requests for some exchanges asking to manage ICO for our project, waiting answers from them.
Oh at least you decide!) Cool
I'm sure this is the right move. November 16, 2016, 03:52:27 PM
Round team decided to distribute tokens via ICO. Maximum ICO amount - 100 BTC. All additional information will be available tomorrow. We already sent requests for some exchanges asking to manage ICO for our project, waiting answers from them.
November 14, 2016, 09:03:26 AM
To launch ICO we need, marketing aside, to have a technical side ready – ico cabinet, etc. which takes a lot of time. We understand that we better spend this time developing. At the end of the day what’s more important, ICO or a perfect product?
Ok, then launch ICO via exchange, many do it this way. All you need is to talk an exchange into it. They can do it through buy wall, easy.
Sure, that is a valid option, but what’s the point for people to invest and wait another half a year until project is finally released?
You can distribute tokens just like Singular did (and it’s still being developed while their coin is already being traded hot). In this case you won’t have the pressure of traders asking you to speed up.
November 14, 2016, 07:24:55 AM
To launch ICO we need, marketing aside, to have a technical side ready – ico cabinet, etc. which takes a lot of time. We understand that we better spend this time developing. At the end of the day what’s more important, ICO or a perfect product?
Ok, then launch ICO via exchange, many do it this way. All you need is to talk an exchange into it. They can do it through buy wall, easy.
Sure, that is a valid option, but what’s the point for people to invest and wait another half a year until project is finally released?
November 14, 2016, 07:17:58 AM
Yes you can do it like that, nice one.
November 14, 2016, 06:00:40 AM
I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment
and initial distribution of coins.
Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process. So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.
If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.
We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.
Very much so. You better do everything openly instead of going into hiding and developing the project all by yourselves. Work publicly and if people want to invest, and according to forum there are some – it would be stupid if you don’t give them such option. I suggest that you tell a minimum amount you need for development and then announce ICO. If you get it – everyone benefits, if not – you don’t lose anything. On top of that we’ll see how strongly you believe in the project and want it working and decentralized.
We are tech geeks, we can’t do ICO. We are not strong when it comes to marketing and it’s easier for us to develope the platform then take profit of selling. And when the project kicks off – then we’ll be able to get some profit. I.e. people will use it and pay us.
Seriously bro, you have no idea how to get this thing going. For God’s sake, launch ICO )
To launch ICO we need, marketing aside, to have a technical side ready – ico cabinet, etc. which takes a lot of time. We understand that we better spend this time developing. At the end of the day what’s more important, ICO or a perfect product?
Ok, then launch ICO via exchange, many do it this way. All you need is to talk an exchange into it. They can do it through buy wall, easy.
November 13, 2016, 03:53:06 PM
I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment
and initial distribution of coins.
Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process. So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.
If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.
We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.
Very much so. You better do everything openly instead of going into hiding and developing the project all by yourselves. Work publicly and if people want to invest, and according to forum there are some – it would be stupid if you don’t give them such option. I suggest that you tell a minimum amount you need for development and then announce ICO. If you get it – everyone benefits, if not – you don’t lose anything. On top of that we’ll see how strongly you believe in the project and want it working and decentralized.
We are tech geeks, we can’t do ICO. We are not strong when it comes to marketing and it’s easier for us to develope the platform then take profit of selling. And when the project kicks off – then we’ll be able to get some profit. I.e. people will use it and pay us.
Seriously bro, you have no idea how to get this thing going. For God’s sake, launch ICO )
To launch ICO we need, marketing aside, to have a technical side ready – ico cabinet, etc. which takes a lot of time. We understand that we better spend this time developing. At the end of the day what’s more important, ICO or a perfect product?
Well, both are equally important, you just don’t get it
November 13, 2016, 03:50:14 PM
WTF?? Give us ICO! Its crypto LOL. You need a normal coin distributing, whith out this your market will be faild!
November 13, 2016, 03:31:47 PM
I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment
and initial distribution of coins.
Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process. So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.
If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.
We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.
Very much so. You better do everything openly instead of going into hiding and developing the project all by yourselves. Work publicly and if people want to invest, and according to forum there are some – it would be stupid if you don’t give them such option. I suggest that you tell a minimum amount you need for development and then announce ICO. If you get it – everyone benefits, if not – you don’t lose anything. On top of that we’ll see how strongly you believe in the project and want it working and decentralized.
We are tech geeks, we can’t do ICO. We are not strong when it comes to marketing and it’s easier for us to develope the platform then take profit of selling. And when the project kicks off – then we’ll be able to get some profit. I.e. people will use it and pay us.
Seriously bro, you have no idea how to get this thing going. For God’s sake, launch ICO )
To launch ICO we need, marketing aside, to have a technical side ready – ico cabinet, etc. which takes a lot of time. We understand that we better spend this time developing. At the end of the day what’s more important, ICO or a perfect product?
November 12, 2016, 05:20:13 AM
I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment
and initial distribution of coins.
Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process. So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.
If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.
We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.
Very much so. You better do everything openly instead of going into hiding and developing the project all by yourselves. Work publicly and if people want to invest, and according to forum there are some – it would be stupid if you don’t give them such option. I suggest that you tell a minimum amount you need for development and then announce ICO. If you get it – everyone benefits, if not – you don’t lose anything. On top of that we’ll see how strongly you believe in the project and want it working and decentralized.
We are tech geeks, we can’t do ICO. We are not strong when it comes to marketing and it’s easier for us to develope the platform then take profit of selling. And when the project kicks off – then we’ll be able to get some profit. I.e. people will use it and pay us.
Seriously bro, you have no idea how to get this thing going. For God’s sake, launch ICO )
November 11, 2016, 03:33:32 PM
I like your approach) Specifically, I think that you need to launch ICO which will ensure a huge interest from crypto community and take care of investment
and initial distribution of coins.
Frankly, initially we didn’t want to launch ICO because, firstly, we already have investors and we don’t need a lot for development, secondly, ICO is a time-consuming process. So we decided to focus on technical part instead of spreading ourselves thin on crowdfunding.
If you don’t need a lot of funds then you definitely should launch ICO and then you won’t depend on investors. Develop your project as you please and no one will ever restrict you while interested users will be able to invest and even profit, of course, if it’s a really good project.
We are not concerned with trading and price, what we really want now is to create a successful project. But there’s a bit of truth in that statement, if we won’t depend on investors then no one will pressure us. In addition, coin price will be stabilized by the time the platform is up and running.
Very much so. You better do everything openly instead of going into hiding and developing the project all by yourselves. Work publicly and if people want to invest, and according to forum there are some – it would be stupid if you don’t give them such option. I suggest that you tell a minimum amount you need for development and then announce ICO. If you get it – everyone benefits, if not – you don’t lose anything. On top of that we’ll see how strongly you believe in the project and want it working and decentralized.
We are tech geeks, we can’t do ICO. We are not strong when it comes to marketing and it’s easier for us to develope the platform then take profit of selling. And when the project kicks off – then we’ll be able to get some profit. I.e. people will use it and pay us.
Guys don't be stupid, announce ICO and give us opportunity to trade.
Jump to: