I absolutely do not understand anything. Participants of the bounty are waiting for their reward for a long several months. For what reason they were not paid ? HDAC is a serious project and I did not expect it to happen that way.
Personally im not too bothered, as HDAC is not trading on exchanges anyway - Im sure the team will distribute to bounty participants first, before doing any exchange listings.
http://www.bibox.com
trading here.
and mining here:
http://dac.signal2noi.se
Just to clarify that is an unofficial listing which the team did not engage. They have said when there is an official exchange they will announce it on their telegram.
https://t.me/Hdac_TGE
it's an official [s2n] pool and public for anyone to mine this open source project.
is the likes of Slush or Nanopool 'unofficial' pools for other coins?
I don't quite understand your logic in perpetually remarking that most community efforts of this coin are 'unofficial'
perhaps you would like to elaborate and explain the term 'official' when pertaining to DAC? Because it seems that a lot of miners are getting confused about all of this.
You make a project open-source, but only want official channels to support it?
I think the marketing team have some questions to answer here?
thanks.
Hey rgsnedds
As you said, Hdac is an open source project, anyone can mine the DAC tokens.
The message above was referring to the listing of DAC on exchanges.
In that case, as it was clarified - Hdac didn't list their coin officially yet.
Means that the company didn't ask BiBox/Bitonbay or any other exchange that did so until now, to list DAC there.
When Hdac will be listed officially on an exchange - it will be announced.
But even then, listing on an exchange is at the discretion of the exchange.
Therefore an 'official' exchange listing simply means "we've paid an exchange to have our coin on it"
If i were the developers, i'd be pretty pleased that an exchange wanted to carry the coin and stop the wishy-washy statements about 'not being officially invovled'
If the developers didn't want the coin to be open-source.. then why release it as an open source project.
Clearly there is not a great experience in crypto here.I've been involved since 2009 and to be quite honest, eithere the developers, or the marketing team have make huge mistakes here.
The ICO was sensible at 14% and the investment was huge. Huge enough to afford a prime-time television advert.
The initiative is great, the product looks fabulous and it looks like it could be a market leader.
here's my concern:
it's time the marketing team and the developers started looking after the miners of the blockchain and stop with the 'that's not official' statements, because at the end of the day, the blockchain does not exist without miners keeping it running.
And for christ sake... fix that diff retargeting, it's a shambles.
