Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][SBC] From Death Comes Life – The Rebirth of StableCoin - URGENT UPDATE - page 40. (Read 198682 times)

sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 251
I've have to wonder if we've reached the point where there *needs* to be more than one developer on this project.

@artos, it's obvious you still have shit going on in your life that keeps you from addressing issues with this coin. We're now into the third day of a situation where the difficulty is pegged... and will only rise. Your response: it's being monitored. There is nothing to monitor. We need a fix. It's a simple fix. It's a fix that's been posted here. It's a fix that's been committed via GitHub... it's a matter of merging code. It simply couldn't be any easier.

There are a lot of us that have a great deal of money invested in SBC and we're left thinking 'am I an idiot for thinking this guy will stick with the project... after having abandoned it already?'

Dude, what the hell can we do to help? This thing is dying here and YOU are responsible.
Couldn't have said this better.

For the time being, I am moving my mining resources to another currency (DGC).  I am not certain I feel comfortable with Stablecoin until I begin to see some real responsiveness from artos.

Not certain at this time that eagle eye wasn't closer to the truth than not.  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4051283

I made this comment before and it still holds true.
Quote
Those of us who have been mining SBC have not been doing so out of the goodness of our hearts, we are doing so in the hopes that we are mining a coin that has a bright future and that will ultimately reward those who have expended their mining capacity on SBC's rather than another coin.

The key to success in any venture is open, frequent and informative updates.  We are all making a bet that our efforts will be rewarded and we're comfortable with that decision, as long as we feel that things are moving in the correct direction.  When communication lags, then investors (and miners--especially newbie miners) begin to get nervous . . . especially when you see the coin value and market cap in a slow, steady decline.

Gamblers and investors are a skittish lot and they require some degree of reassurance that they are not 1. Fools betting on a horse that can't cross the finish line, or 2. Gullible fools who are being played by those more experienced and knowledgeable than they.

Patience is needed on both sides, the miners and gamblers need to allow artos the time necessary to get whatever maintenance and corrective measures accomplished.  On the other hand, artos, hazard and others need to understand what the rest are going through and provide a little more thorough communications and updates--maybe even a pep-talk or two. Grin

Artos, Hazard, I know you aren't baby-sitters, but in taking on the responsibility for creating and promoting the StableCoin, you also incurred some responsibility to the people you are asking to trust you.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
I've have to wonder if we've reached the point where there *needs* to be more than one developer on this project.

@artos, it's obvious you still have shit going on in your life that keeps you from addressing issues with this coin. We're now into the third day of a situation where the difficulty is pegged... and will only rise. Your response: it's being monitored. There is nothing to monitor. We need a fix. It's a simple fix. It's a fix that's been posted here. It's a fix that's been committed via GitHub... it's a matter of merging code. It simply couldn't be any easier.

There are a lot of us that have a great deal of money invested in SBC and we're left thinking 'am I an idiot for thinking this guy will stick with the project... after having abandoned it already?'

Dude, what the hell can we do to help? This thing is dying here and YOU are responsible.
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 251
Difficulty's now at 7.579!!!!  Really? 

This is beginning to look like one giant clusterf***
FaT
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
Message from Cryptocult Pools - http://sbc.cryptoculture.net

Fellow miners, I learned a hard lesson tonight. Our late update to version 1.4 really screwed us up. I am very dedicated to providing the best service to my customers, so I am very sorry and I understand you disappointment as a fellow miner.

The late update to 1.4 caused the following issues. 1. Caused our pool to get corrupted. Therefore we had to create a new pool from scratch. 2. Many users received confirmed transactions for blocks that exists on the wrong blockchain - therefore were invalid. These invalid transactions corrupted the metadata of the pool and rendered it in-operational.

I hope everyone had autopayout enabled and got all of their valid StableCoins out of the pool.

The new pool is up, and you will have to recreate your login id.

This issue will NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN!!! I hope you will continue to support us.

Remove pool fee? Lost a lot of shares Sad
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Welcome to new pool.

SBC.FORKPOOL.COM!

Live support.
24/7 monitiring.
Good admin, does not bite.  Grin
Stratum.
Prop payouts.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
It's funny, as I was putting the code together for the restructuring of the difficulty algorithm patch, I noticed the same thing. I thought it was odd to see an integer type representing floating point data. However, I see the int64 datatype used all over the Bitcoin codebase for similar calculations. I wonder if the rest of the codebase is simply dropping precision and rounding up/down on those calculations.

In any case, it probably is just a simple fix to force floating point precision on those calculations. Hard to test this bit of code... I ran into that issue while writing the code that's currently sitting as a pull request.

Edit: updated my pull request with the change required to fix the loss-of-precision issue. Good find!
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
SO if we didnt have auto payout enabled we just lost all of our coins?Huh??

This really sux,,,


I lost around 40 coins, not much but it is to me....








sRFFQv5H8cLgDcfkYD31dd7DsFJAPrnDJe
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Just FYI, FedoraCoin adapted SBC's 1.4 difficulty algo for itself but it turns out the difficulty only adjusts up, not down, eg. we had 1gH/s when FedoraCoin started and the difficulty jumped to 38+, but when people left and the hashrate went down to 400mH/s the difficulty didn't change, and it hasn't changed since, so we had to go back to DogeCoin's difficulty algo for now
Doesn't mean that it is same with SBC. Since that would be a problem. I also think there was a larger hype at the begining as it is with every coin but it stabilize after a while. If such an issue exists with StableCoin hope it will get fixed.
It probably does, looking at the difficulty for SBC it doesn't seem to have dropped once since their new algo came in.

I think I've figured out why this is, in the new algo (and the one FedoraCoin adopted up until block 2500, for any fedora fans reading) he does
Code:
nActualTimespanMax = nTargetTimespan * (112/100); //12% down
nActualTimespanMin = nTargetTimespan * (100/111); //10% up
Where nActualTimespanMax/nActualTimespanMin and nTargetTimespan are all int64's, and from what I remembered int64's couldn't do floating point arithmetic directly without something bad happening

So I wrote some simple code to test it (long long is the VC++ name for int64):
Code:
long long nTargetTimespan = 600;
long long nActualTimespanMax = nTargetTimespan * (112 / 100); //12% down
long long nActualTimespanMin = nTargetTimespan * (100 / 111); //10% up

float expectedMax = (float)nTargetTimespan * (float)(112.f / 100.f);
float expectedMin = (float)nTargetTimespan * (float)(100.f / 111.f);

printf("ActualTimespanMax: %lld, ActualTimespanMin: %lld, expectedMax: %g, expectedMin: %g", nActualTimespanMax, nActualTimespanMin, expectedMax, expectedMin);

Which output:
Code:
ActualTimespanMax: 600, ActualTimespanMin: 0, expectedMax: 672, expectedMin: 540.541

So yeah, something is definitely wrong, he needs to fix this asap otherwise the difficulty will probably stick for SBC miners too, wish I found this out before I switched back to DogeCoin's algo, I don't think the FedoraCoin miners would like another hard fork update so soon...
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I definitely think it's going to rise. Artos is a dedicated developer, he's just taking a small holiday break.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
So, is SBC dead now after the initial hype or is it coming back in 2014?
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Just FYI, FedoraCoin adapted SBC's 1.4 difficulty algo for itself but it turns out the difficulty only adjusts up, not down, eg. we had 1gH/s when FedoraCoin started and the difficulty jumped to 38+, but when people left and the hashrate went down to 400mH/s the difficulty didn't change, and it hasn't changed since, so we had to go back to DogeCoin's difficulty algo for now
Doesn't mean that it is same with SBC. Since that would be a problem. I also think there was a larger hype at the begining as it is with every coin but it stabilize after a while. If such an issue exists with StableCoin hope it will get fixed.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
Greetings, I am getting an error with the new version of the wallet (1.4.0.0-g3aaa7ba-beta). When it tries to update, it says:

EXCEPTION:11DbException
Db::get: Not enough space
in ProcessMessages()

There is over 18gigs available on that SSD, shouldn't be an issue there. Anyone know what is going on here?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Just FYI, FedoraCoin adapted SBC's 1.4 difficulty algo for itself but it turns out the difficulty only adjusts up, not down, eg. we had 1gH/s when FedoraCoin started and the difficulty jumped to 38+, but when people left and the hashrate went down to 400mH/s the difficulty didn't change, and it hasn't changed since, so we had to go back to DogeCoin's difficulty algo for now
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
thimo the dev
Message from Cryptocult Pools - http://sbc.cryptoculture.net

Fellow miners, I learned a hard lesson tonight. Our late update to version 1.4 really screwed us up. I am very dedicated to providing the best service to my customers, so I am very sorry and I understand you disappointment as a fellow miner.

The late update to 1.4 caused the following issues. 1. Caused our pool to get corrupted. Therefore we had to create a new pool from scratch. 2. Many users received confirmed transactions for blocks that exists on the wrong blockchain - therefore were invalid. These invalid transactions corrupted the metadata of the pool and rendered it in-operational.

I hope everyone had autopayout enabled and got all of their valid StableCoins out of the pool.

The new pool is up, and you will have to recreate your login id.

This issue will NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN!!! I hope you will continue to support us.
what in the hell, i'm getting double my hashrate. What was in that update? GPU cocaine?
full member
Activity: 221
Merit: 100
Artos I have some serious issues at Cryptoculture Pool where users are not getting payouts and I think it has to do with a possible mismatch between Linux and Windows StableCoin Clients

I recently upgraded to 1.4 on my pool which uses Ubuntu.   I also downloaded the Windows client.  It appears the Linux and Windows clients are on different forks even though they are supposed to be the same 1.4 version... they are mining at different blockchain heights, also notice the difficulties are not the same.

When I do getinfo on the Ubuntu Server I get this
{
    "version" : 1040000,
    "protocolversion" : 1040000,
    "walletversion" : 60000,

    "blocks" : 314360,
    "connections" : 0,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 3.66631454,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1387902646,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}

Windows 1.4 Client I get this


{
"version" : 1040000,
"protocolversion" : 1040000,
"walletversion" : 60000,

"blocks" : 313979,
"connections" : 16,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 2.16682822,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1385871005,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00010000,
"errors" : ""
}

Delete the block chain and redownload it. The chain listed on http://sbc.blockexplorer.io/chain/Stablecoin is the correct one.

Hazard, thank you for the suggestion.  I do have a snapshot of the old pool and if I can fix it I will restore it.  In the meantime, I set up SBC CryptoPool 2.0 for miners to use.
full member
Activity: 221
Merit: 100
Message from Cryptocult Pools - http://sbc.cryptoculture.net

Fellow miners, I learned a hard lesson tonight. Our late update to version 1.4 really screwed us up. I am very dedicated to providing the best service to my customers, so I am very sorry and I understand you disappointment as a fellow miner.

The late update to 1.4 caused the following issues. 1. Caused our pool to get corrupted. Therefore we had to create a new pool from scratch. 2. Many users received confirmed transactions for blocks that exists on the wrong blockchain - therefore were invalid. These invalid transactions corrupted the metadata of the pool and rendered it in-operational.

I hope everyone had autopayout enabled and got all of their valid StableCoins out of the pool.

The new pool is up, and you will have to recreate your login id.

This issue will NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN!!! I hope you will continue to support us.
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
Artos I have some serious issues at Cryptoculture Pool where users are not getting payouts and I think it has to do with a possible mismatch between Linux and Windows StableCoin Clients

I recently upgraded to 1.4 on my pool which uses Ubuntu.   I also downloaded the Windows client.  It appears the Linux and Windows clients are on different forks even though they are supposed to be the same 1.4 version... they are mining at different blockchain heights, also notice the difficulties are not the same.

When I do getinfo on the Ubuntu Server I get this
{
    "version" : 1040000,
    "protocolversion" : 1040000,
    "walletversion" : 60000,

    "blocks" : 314360,
    "connections" : 0,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 3.66631454,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1387902646,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}

Windows 1.4 Client I get this


{
"version" : 1040000,
"protocolversion" : 1040000,
"walletversion" : 60000,

"blocks" : 313979,
"connections" : 16,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 2.16682822,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1385871005,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00010000,
"errors" : ""
}

Delete the block chain and redownload it. The chain listed on http://sbc.blockexplorer.io/chain/Stablecoin is the correct one.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
Don't know if this will help but I just restarted my miner and everything was fine after that. Shares are accepted and I get what I mine. Try paying out some small amount to be sure it works, that is the best way to test it I think.
Seems credit is building in the unconfirmed but not confirming?...I never have this many unconfirms and 0 confirms. also, looks like about 600 coins have not credited to my cryptsy account,,, the ones shown in the transactions with no blocks or showing n/a ....  not good Sad last payout was at 14:00 or 2pm today.... into my cryptsy account.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Don't know if this will help but I just restarted my miner and everything was fine after that. Shares are accepted and I get what I mine. Try paying out some small amount to be sure it works, that is the best way to test it I think.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
Artos I have some serious issues at Cryptoculture Pool where users are not getting payouts and I think it has to do with a possible mismatch between Linux and Windows StableCoin Clients

I recently upgraded to 1.4 on my pool which uses Ubuntu.   I also downloaded the Windows client.  It appears the Linux and Windows clients are on different forks even though they are supposed to be the same 1.4 version... they are mining at different blockchain heights, also notice the difficulties are not the same.

When I do getinfo on the Ubuntu Server I get this
{
    "version" : 1040000,
    "protocolversion" : 1040000,
    "walletversion" : 60000,

    "blocks" : 314360,
    "connections" : 0,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 3.66631454,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1387902646,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}

Windows 1.4 Client I get this


{
"version" : 1040000,
"protocolversion" : 1040000,
"walletversion" : 60000,

"blocks" : 313979,
"connections" : 16,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 2.16682822,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1385871005,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00010000,
"errors" : ""
}



Miner is still hashing and shares accepted, so are we on the blockchain or a fork right now? PS: Luv this pool please correct issues! Smiley
Merry Christmas!
Pages:
Jump to: