Topic: [ANN][SEM] Semux - Official Thread - page 123. (Read 694126 times)

The idea of POW was abolished under the pressure of the community? And now the new idea of paying 1 sem for one line of code? Do you really think that this is a great idea? It seems to me delirious. 1 sem for 1 line of code)))
In my opinion the shorter and compact code, the better) Now the coders will have the opportunity to write any nonsense, and the more nonsense the better for them, in terms of payment.  I think the idea with the POW was much better.

dont think of that much, but whatever it is it worth listing, even if it needs community help
binance is a good space for coins and can help them very much

hope to see semux there

Binanc eis for ICO coins mostly. The most elaborate scams use Binance pumps. They sell a small percentage of their coins in an ICO, use the money for a binance listing and then dump their own coins on binance with a nice 10x.

We talk a lot about binance exchange but we do not know the specific conditions. Money? I thought the same thing before, but is that true? Do you know the full airdrop at binance?

Binance very good exchange, but listing fee is cost 1 000 000 $ . I'm think it is impossible on this moment to be listed on Binance 
But we have all chances in future.

We realized that some of the aidrop payments didn't go through.

Please check the airdrop logs at https://www.semux.org/airdrop/eth/summary

If you're on the logs but didn't receive the coins, let me know.

maybe Semux will be listed in Binance in 2020.

What exchange we are looking for.  Binance is the best.

I faced same issue. What is the resolution. Anyone help please.

Hi Dev,

I have multiple ETH address having ETH balances on it, Can I use Single Semux address to claim airdrop or not ?

Semux's team technology is pretty good, but now many people do not know the existence of this coin, so the project team needs to strengthen further marketing.

yeah, the price of SEM has stayed below 20k sats, however, I strongly believe it will bounce back and reach to its new all-time high than the historical price 20~25K sats.
Wish it can hit 100k or somewhere around the point when the green market coming.

Does it make sense now for the project to go to a large exchange? I think after the project is well tested it will be a good solution for growth.

When will the percentage of the increase in airdrop be distributed to the purse? Wish Semux more development.

This is possible, so the project team is working hard to meet more and more excellent exchanges. Semux's future development is worth looking forward to.

I've noticed that now that the validator bug has been fixed, the current voting system has become a kind of race to the bottom. It looks like the best strategy for delegates is to have the least amount of votes while remaining a validator. This seems a less than optimum way to drive security and demand for semux.

An idea I've thought about is what would happen if instead of all the validators getting the same reward (i.e. block frequency), there were several levels. For example, if the 100 validator positions were divided into roughly thirds.

Level 1 (validators 71-100) could have the same setup as is used now, with any delegate capable of reaching at least the 100 position getting the same rewards as any other validator up to the 71st position. Having the same rewards across all positions in level 1 would maintain some stability at this lowest entry point level.

Level 2 (validators 30-70) would have rewards scaled (the fun level  ), so that 69 would get slightly more blocks than 70, and 68 slightly more than 69, and so on, up to position 30. This scaled reward would eliminate the race to the bottom in terms of votes. It would instead make it a race to the top, increasing security, and increasing demand for semux.

Level 3 (validators 1-30) would be similar to level 1, in that all the validators get the same reward, but unlike level 1 the uniform reward is equivalent to the highest reward achievable in level 2. Having the top level rewards the same would help prevent centralization of semux votes at the very top positions.

I know it's probably too late to change now, and I also may be blind to a fatal flaw in this kind of scenario. But, I think it's interesting to think about how this kind of setup could operate from a game theory perspective in a way to drive demand for semux instead of people trying to get the minimum amount of votes while remaining a validator.

Just my 2 satoshis  

interesting, when will be new exchange because the Stocks is not reliable..

Pool Phash had some trouble last 2 days - back at business!

Please vote a bit to earn!

Price is just not reflecting the solid tech behind this project.

when can i use the signature ?