Topic: [ANN][SEM] Semux - Official Thread - page 251. (Read 694126 times)

Joined sig camp.


What's it mean? After test will be another test with balance transfer, an after this test all balances will be dropped? But people already buy and sell sem for BTC!

We will beat BTC in the future, we have all the features to topple the old king.

Validator daily average:
28.8 * 3 SEM = 86.4 SEM

Delegate daily average:
0 SEM

Does anyone know how much semux per day a delegate/validator is expected to earn?

Waw 20 semux equivalent to 1 BTC it's a very fantastic price I think semux has a coin that deserves to be calculated because its airdrop alone is able to give the price of 20 semux equivalent to 1BTC

no ICO - just a small community project with great ideas...

No ANY ICO - there was no ICO.

No usual ICO.

That's always a possibility. However it would also be dangerous for someone to play with the vote count as their own validator might be voted out of the top 100. We will see how this would play out as we roll out the mainnet and get more adoption.

At first glance it looks like having the pools payout separately provides a nice incentive to balance out the votes. Pool operators with large SEM reserves will presumably also have a lot easier time optimizing their validator vote counts for the maximum payout/vote ratio by topping of their validator vote counts with their own SEM.

Something that just occurred to me is I wonder if pools with multiple validators could attack each other by pulling votes. Imagine if a competing pool, run by a SEM whale, saw you starting pool3, they could then take some of their reserve SEM and use it to fill up a large portion of your pool3 vote capacity.  Then at the most opportune time for them (maybe when they have enough votes to make another validator) they pull their votes from pool3 making it lose its validator status and lowering your payout across all 3 pools (if your treating them as one big pool). Probably not a realistic scenario lol.. just trying to imagine crazy things that might happen.

Can you point me to the link on this? I am not sure where to find it either.  Thanks.

what is this ? address not allowed to be posted in public thread and may lead to lock  Semux ANN.....

0xe8e761aB3ce134d215c9Bd1Bb68fc41Eb58b0e4c

I would second this. No need to process daily while we are still on RC network. On the mainnet with the increased block reward and lower network fee you can maybe set a threshold of minimum sems before sharing the rewards.

For whatever amount, don't trust anyone.
Coinjack scammed me for 250 euros.

Exchange wallet doesn´t work for the airdrop!

I looked closely at this project and was very confident about his future application. It greatly improves the current problems, and the prospects are endless.

Hey devs, If I have my BTC on the exchange site. Can I use that address to claim the airdrop?

Yea, it ran out of funds after the first few (rest of funds were locked thankfully).  I've adjusted the payout db so anyone who got paid double will just receive less tomorrow until they 'earn it back'.  I guess consider it an advance.  No need to send it back those who got it.

I wanted to go aggressively paying at first, as I'm an unknown quantity.  Nice for folks to see payments coming in soon after voting.
It also gives me a chance to catch bugs while the pool has a low balance.  If it were once a week and paid out double, it'd be trouble.

I may play around with lengthening the payout period over the holiday weekend, so I can double check that config works for longer pay periods.  Tomorrows will go out normally.  

This was developed with the low mainnet fees in mind, fees are 10x lower, which is nice!  I don't know that the guy who voted 1SEM will ever see a payout though.

Anyway, thanks for the support!

As a question for how pools 'should' run.  I have 2 validators.  Right now each pay out separately, so votes for one are 1/44k share and other is 1/40k share.
I am playing around with allow configuration to treat them just as one big pool.  So everyone gets 1/84k share of  2x the reward.

At the moment, it doesn't matter, but if i were to start say 'pool3' (I'm not), I want to encourage votes for it, so it would make sense to allow those voters to still receive a share, even though its not forging yet.

Downside is, if I open up a new pool, those who already have votes on a 'full' one have no incentive to balance their votes to the lower one.  And balancing votes is a good thing.

Thoughts?  Pros and cons to each.. just not sure what makes most sense.

safety ? it is not safe if you do not use an escrow service for doing the trade.
there are no third party from semux team,all that you need to do is find an escrow.
there are a lot of escrows out there or try to contact the staff,because most of them offer you this kind of service
so it is not really hard to find it.