Author

Topic: [ANN][SILKCOIN][DARKSILK PREANN][TESTING STORMNODES/DarkSIlk MARKET/I2P] - page 132. (Read 289509 times)

sr. member
Activity: 463
Merit: 250
Let's try 111%.
It will be interesting.
full member
Activity: 195
Merit: 100
What about de-listing on Bittrex???
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
SILK. All the cool kids are buying it.
hero member
Activity: 480
Merit: 500
hero member
Activity: 480
Merit: 500
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
SILK. All the cool kids are buying it.
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
SILK. All the cool kids are buying it.
.... and there shall be signs and wonders.....
hero member
Activity: 480
Merit: 500
Not sure why, but I went to vote and somehow I kept hitting 111%.  Damn you guys and your subliminal messaging.
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
SILK. All the cool kids are buying it.
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
SILK. All the cool kids are buying it.
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
SILK. All the cool kids are buying it.
member
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
SILK. All the cool kids are buying it.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 505

New Poll active!  
POS percentage RAISE

CHOICES

11 % POS
111 % POS
and 1111 % POS!!


Download your wallet and purchase your POS % VOTE NOW!!!

hero member
Activity: 480
Merit: 500
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 505
1111% is a bit drastic don't you think. The amount of coins will multiply by more than 11x a year. There is no amount of development that could fund improvements to counteract the drop in value especially because the price will drop before anything has a chance to be developed. How many times do you see an improvement for a coin cause the price to rise 11x? Never? rarely? It would never balance out it is a losing proposition.


just saying. I suppose we don't have much to lose since most silk holders only have a few hundred $$$$ invested at current price but I thought we were on track with just the voting system to support development and and attract new people to silk.

 

I don't think 1111% is too drastic. Don't want to talk about other coins here, but Hyperstake has 750% and it is doing quite well in the 2 months it has been active. So as long as it is managed well it will work fine.

 It is possible 1111 could work..  again yes as long as it would be managed properly and have a use.   The silkweaver could be that use.  But is not complete.

  At 1111 we would quite easily increase supply to billions.. If there is a timely use would make sense.

  111 is perhaps a more sensible choice and may just be a nice sweet spot.
sr. member
Activity: 404
Merit: 250
The more I think about it, 111 might be okay, but holy crap 1111 is extreme.

Agree, we can't be too greedy
voted
hero member
Activity: 480
Merit: 500
The more I think about it, 111 might be okay, but holy crap 1111 is extreme.
hero member
Activity: 480
Merit: 500
I agree with an increase in interest, but I like 11% better.  2% is a little to low to encourage savings, but anything under 20% would be okay.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
1111% is a bit drastic don't you think. The amount of coins will multiply by more than 11x a year. There is no amount of development that could fund improvements to counteract the drop in value especially because the price will drop before anything has a chance to be developed. How many times do you see an improvement for a coin cause the price to rise 11x? Never? rarely? It would never balance out it is a losing proposition.


just saying. I suppose we don't have much to lose since most silk holders only have a few hundred $$$$ invested at current price but I thought we were on track with just the voting system to support development and and attract new people to silk.

 

I don't think 1111% is too drastic. Don't want to talk about other coins here, but Hyperstake has 750% and it is doing quite well in the 2 months it has been active. So as long as it is managed well it will work fine.
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
Jump to: