Topic: [ANN][SUPERCOIN]First P2p Decentralized Trustless Anonymous Wallet Coming Soon - page 378. (Read 473524 times)
June 16, 2014, 03:13:24 PM
OMG .... PionnerCoin , another anoncoin more volume than SC ............. and SM2, another anoncoin soon.
Bubble of anoncoins
June 16, 2014, 02:22:21 PM
Looks like after the whole Ninja debacle they are going to basically review every coin.
Lovely....
Lovely....
it would be awesome if bittrex could confirm that busoni made a mistake
June 16, 2014, 02:11:09 PM
Looks like after the whole Ninja debacle they are going to basically review every coin.
Lovely....
Lovely....
June 16, 2014, 02:07:31 PM
Jesus, what now?
Why has Super been disabled on bittrex?
it looks there is now a maintenance.Why has Super been disabled on bittrex?
June 16, 2014, 02:06:40 PM
super is not the only one, there quite a few that are too. wonder why?
Wallet server maintenance.
https://bittrex.com/News
June 16, 2014, 02:03:32 PM
super is not the only one, there quite a few that are too. wonder why?
June 16, 2014, 02:02:00 PM
Jesus, what now?
Why has Super been disabled on bittrex?
Why has Super been disabled on bittrex?
June 16, 2014, 01:36:24 PM
Cool, I bought some. All the FUD from Busoni actually got this coin some attention and lowered the price making it easy to buy in.
June 16, 2014, 01:25:11 PM
And the winner is...
great! really nice, strong design. the ONLY thing i didn't like about SUPER was the superman feel to the logo
definitely a million times better
June 16, 2014, 01:21:21 PM
And the winner is...
great! really nice, strong design. the ONLY thing i didn't like about SUPER was the superman feel to the logo
definitely a million times better
June 16, 2014, 01:19:40 PM
Vote for super every hours
June 16, 2014, 01:19:13 PM
dev coin logo revised
Let me know what you think
Let me know what you think
Thanks now it's really SUPER :-)
which one with or without stars
i think the stars tie the wording together nicely and keep the circular motion going around the edge, im not sure how else to put that, it sort of flows better
June 16, 2014, 01:17:34 PM
looks fantastic. good work!
multiplatform release with client updates please!
multiplatform release with client updates please!
June 16, 2014, 01:16:47 PM
And the winner is...
June 16, 2014, 01:16:31 PM
dev coin logo revised
Let me know what you think
Let me know what you think
very nice!
with stars or without stars.
stars make it slightly harder to read.. less pop.. nice flair though. no stars may be cleaner design.. stars are so currency though... hrmmm
June 16, 2014, 01:15:55 PM
dev coin logo revised
Let me know what you think
Let me know what you think
very nice!
with stars or without stars.
i think with the stars
June 16, 2014, 01:09:51 PM
wat eva people can read for themselves
i;ve wasted enough time already
have fun
i;ve wasted enough time already
have fun
gtfo noob.
Dev what is status with busoni
Although Busoni issued an apology (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7319548), it is not enough. They need to give a conclusion of their investigation: is Supercoin good or bad, do they find any issues, if at all? If no issues or no major issues, and since Supercoin was the first in voting list, they should add it to Poloniex, this is the only way they can clear all their mistakes.
Their debacle caused many investors to lose money, we demand an explanation from them on the conclusion of their investigation of supercoin!
But now I don't see any conclusions, and they have kept the title of that thread ("Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin" https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-poloniex-has-rejected-supercoin-652351), in a very misleading way. This title is translated to "We have rejected a bad coin", but what is bad? They did not or can not say anything (because Supercoin is a great coin!).
Before this is done, I can't see Busoni's apology is sincere at all. We demand Poloniex give a clear explanation on it!
June 16, 2014, 01:09:18 PM
wat eva people can read for themselves
i;ve wasted enough time already
have fun
i;ve wasted enough time already
have fun
gtfo noob.
Dev what is status with busoni
Although Busoni issued an apology (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7319548), it is not enough. They need to give a conclusion of their investigation: is Supercoin good or bad, do they find any issues, if at all? If no issues or no major issues, and since Supercoin was the first in voting list, they should add it to Poloniex, this is the only way they can clear all their mistakes.
Their debacle caused many investors to lose money, we demand an explanation from them on the conclusion of their investigation of supercoin!
But now I don't see any conclusions, and they have kept the title of that thread ("Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin" https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-poloniex-has-rejected-supercoin-652351), in a very misleading way. This title is translated to "We have rejected a bad coin", but what is bad? They did not or can not say anything (because Supercoin is a great coin!).
Before this is done, I can't see Busoni's apology is sincere at all. We demand Poloniex give a clear explanation on it!
+1 i agree with this.
June 16, 2014, 01:07:51 PM
wat eva people can read for themselves
i;ve wasted enough time already
have fun
i;ve wasted enough time already
have fun
gtfo noob.
Dev what is status with busoni
Although Busoni issued an apology (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7319548), it is not enough. They need to give a conclusion of their investigation: is Supercoin good or bad, do they find any issues, if at all? If no issues or no major issues, and since Supercoin was the first in voting list, they should add it to Poloniex, this is the only way they can clear all their mistakes.
Their debacle caused many investors to lose money, we demand an explanation from them on the conclusion of their investigation of supercoin!
But now I don't see any conclusions, and they have kept the title of that thread ("Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin" https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-poloniex-has-rejected-supercoin-652351), in a very misleading way. This title is translated to "We have rejected a bad coin", but what is bad? They did not or can not say anything (because Supercoin is a great coin!).
Before this is done, I can't see Busoni's apology is sincere at all. We demand Poloniex give a clear explanation on it!
+1. Yes absolutely!
makes a lot sense to me. Waiting for busoni to explain, clarify and correct...
June 16, 2014, 12:52:25 PM
You know as soon as i have some answers from busoni, i'll get back with this to the community. I am aware most of you stressed with this official giga fud. But both parties (dev team vs. poloniex) is positive, at least communicating for some time.
Jump to: