Is the giveaway still active?
Not sure, but something does not seem right about this coin. Looks like the consensus was quietly changed at some point or someone is doing something nasty.
2015-01-02 11:26:20 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : hash doesn't match nBits
2015-01-02 11:26:20 ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed
2015-01-02 11:26:20 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
Just look at all these nodes with different chain heights:
Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[addr] => 85.25.196.115:14333
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200490
[lastrecv] => 1420200260
[bytessent] => 5218573
[bytesrecv] => 775772
[blocksrequested] => 6757
[conntime] => 1419916221
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.6.1/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 17544
[banscore] => 0
)
[1] => Array
(
[addr] => 75.129.82.163:9333
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200474
[lastrecv] => 1420200474
[bytessent] => 2307139
[bytesrecv] => 4850800
[blocksrequested] => 0
[conntime] => 1419996092
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.7.2/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 703580
[banscore] => 0
[syncnode] => 1
)
[2] => Array
(
[addr] => 107.170.170.56:7559
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200493
[lastrecv] => 1420200478
[bytessent] => 472003
[bytesrecv] => 154702
[blocksrequested] => 1
[conntime] => 1420111408
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.9.2/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 164223
[banscore] => 0
)
[3] => Array
(
[addr] => 148.100.32.54:9027
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200462
[lastrecv] => 1420200289
[bytessent] => 1479040
[bytesrecv] => 270202
[blocksrequested] => 2217
[conntime] => 1420114678
[version] => 70003
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.6.2/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 47082
[banscore] => 10
)
[4] => Array
(
[addr] => 193.109.128.156:9333
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200399
[lastrecv] => 1420200168
[bytessent] => 1358582
[bytesrecv] => 250503
[blocksrequested] => 2237
[conntime] => 1420121323
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.7.4/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 0
[banscore] => 0
)
[5] => Array
(
[addr] => 2.121.15.15:9333
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200493
[lastrecv] => 1420200397
[bytessent] => 114369
[bytesrecv] => 105387
[blocksrequested] => 0
[conntime] => 1420171564
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.6.2/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 580787
[banscore] => 0
)
[6] => Array
(
[addr] => 91.226.172.8:9333
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200490
[lastrecv] => 1420200492
[bytessent] => 12797
[bytesrecv] => 78721
[blocksrequested] => 0
[conntime] => 1420189381
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.6.2/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 682986
[banscore] => 0
)
[7] => Array
(
[addr] => 54.178.177.173:9999
[services] => 00000003
[lastsend] => 1420200481
[lastrecv] => 1420200490
[bytessent] => 2594
[bytesrecv] => 77076
[blocksrequested] => 0
[conntime] => 1420194556
[version] => 70002
[subver] => /Satoshi:0.9.1.2/
[inbound] =>
[startingheight] => 75201
[banscore] => 0
)
)
The developer really needs to fix this by creating a new check point at block 70,000 with block hash:
48c1ea33b1b3fcdf599b8fb7438ce73263ac7d4c6195812ecc5678b24da78696
