In your Whitepaper, you have a comparison chart. What do u mean with Production System? A working product?
Also, there are several wrong information about your "competitors".
e.g. HERO has a working product, offers (theoretically) more than one sports type with their API for 3rd parties and if I understand your "Revenue Distribution" right than also this is done by HERO with the "Pool Reward".
And finally, what is the reason you offer your service in the blockchain when you still have bookmakers?
Why not cutting out the bookies like HERO does?
Hi Mate.
We are not ragging on Hero, they are a great product. We are just highlighting whats around in the wagering space.
As for the transition to blockchain, we have been building wagering platforms for a decade now and we understand
at this stage some things work commercially on the blockchain and some things don't. We are very excited about our parimutuel racebook that will be fully decentralised and operate wholly via a smart contract. But with a sportsbook to get consensus on the number of markets that are required to be competitive just isn't feasible
at the moment. We didnt want to bullshit our community by saying things like "we are decentralised but we will operate centralised oracles" we just say that "at the moment we cant see a working solution for that amount of markets so we will use centralised oracles".
We are offering a full service sportsbook that is functioning and able to go to market immediately, that will help to fund the further development of our blockchain based offerings. Whilst providing revenue for our supporters and hopefully drive up token price as we deliver milestones.