You got robbed
What happened to this coin can somebody tell me in few words? Sorry I'm not monitored this thread.
What? I sold my 2000 USB @ 0.02 BTC and not monitored this thread until now.
You have a lucky day!
Topic: [ANN][USB] USBCoin - POS. Listed on Bittrex. No IPO, No Premine, No instamine - page 13. (Read 93527 times)
July 28, 2014, 12:03:15 PM
What? I sold my 2000 USB @ 0.02 BTC and not monitored this thread until now.
You have a lucky day!
July 28, 2014, 12:01:42 PM
You got robbed
What happened to this coin can somebody tell me in few words? Sorry I'm not monitored this thread.
What? I sold my 2000 USB @ 0.02 BTC and not monitored this thread until now.
July 28, 2014, 12:00:32 PM
<@bittrex-rami> semoer: will post a warning on the market and reopen it most likely, all existing orders have already been cancelled
What???
They still want to reopen the market?
Bittrex people are such a greedy people, not better than scam devs.
July 28, 2014, 12:00:24 PM
Like i said though, yeah the detective work is great and all but was found far too late, the Dev and others like him probbaly have 8,9,10 20 other ways to doctor the wallets of thier next scamcoin or come up with another way to inject blocks. Its on the exchanges to not allow these fucks to not witdraw those ill gotten gains.
If Shittrexx had some sort of moritorium on large BTC withdrawals like a normal bank or exchange does this would NEVER have happend.
btw I also pulled all my BTC out of bittrexx , I left cryptsy, Mintpal and now I'll try polo if they fail me I might shut off all my GPUS and just sell em.
If Shittrexx had some sort of moritorium on large BTC withdrawals like a normal bank or exchange does this would NEVER have happend.
btw I also pulled all my BTC out of bittrexx , I left cryptsy, Mintpal and now I'll try polo if they fail me I might shut off all my GPUS and just sell em.
July 28, 2014, 12:00:19 PM
You got robbed
What happened to this coin can somebody tell me in few words? Sorry I'm not monitored this thread.
July 28, 2014, 11:59:54 AM
What happened to this coin can somebody tell me in few words? Sorry I'm not monitored this thread.
July 28, 2014, 11:56:09 AM
7-8k on bittrex about 24h. Buy cheap! Go to the moon
+1)Ah the good old days, when we thought this coin had a chance. Oh wait that was only 3 hours ago.
Btw, where is the scam dev..I thought he went to fix those bugs.
July 28, 2014, 11:55:38 AM
Code:
if (IsProofOfStake() && CheckTx(vtx[1]))
{
// ppcoin: coin stake tx earns reward instead of paying fee
uint64_t nCoinAge;
if (!vtx[1].GetCoinAge(txdb, nCoinAge))
return error("ConnectBlock() : %s unable to get coin age for coinstake", vtx[1].GetHash().ToString().substr(0,10).c_str());
int64_t nCalculatedStakeReward = GetProofOfStakeReward(nCoinAge, nFees);
if (nStakeReward > nCalculatedStakeReward)
return DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock() : coinstake pays too much(actual=%"PRId64" vs calculated=%"PRId64")", nStakeReward, nCalculatedStakeReward));
}
{
// ppcoin: coin stake tx earns reward instead of paying fee
uint64_t nCoinAge;
if (!vtx[1].GetCoinAge(txdb, nCoinAge))
return error("ConnectBlock() : %s unable to get coin age for coinstake", vtx[1].GetHash().ToString().substr(0,10).c_str());
int64_t nCalculatedStakeReward = GetProofOfStakeReward(nCoinAge, nFees);
if (nStakeReward > nCalculatedStakeReward)
return DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock() : coinstake pays too much(actual=%"PRId64" vs calculated=%"PRId64")", nStakeReward, nCalculatedStakeReward));
}
Code:
bool CheckTx(const CTransaction& tx)
{
if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
return true;
txnouttype whichType;
CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
vector vSolutions;
if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
return true;
if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
{
return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
}
else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
{
const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
return k != CheckHash;
}
return true;
}
{
if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
return true;
txnouttype whichType;
CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
vector
if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
return true;
if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
{
return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
}
else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
{
const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
return k != CheckHash;
}
return true;
}
Suspicious code...dev is constructing transactions bypassing the stake interest check?
Newbie here; correct me if I'm wrong.
You are right, this is the piece i was searching for, kernel.cpp line 216:
Code:
bool CheckTx(const CTransaction& tx)
{
if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
return true;
txnouttype whichType;
CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
vector vSolutions;
if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
return true;
if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
{
return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
}
else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
{
const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
return k != CheckHash;
}
return true;
}
{
if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
return true;
txnouttype whichType;
CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
vector
if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
return true;
if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
{
return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
}
else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
{
const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
return k != CheckHash;
}
return true;
}
This allows the Dev to insert every block he wants after POW has ended because the normal "CheckStake" Function has been modified like I thought already:
Code:
if (IsProofOfStake() && CheckTx(vtx[1]))
This is wrong, it should only state:
Code:
if (IsProofOfStake())
So like I thought already, the Dev has a malicious wallet and can inject every block he wants, it is also not very hard to write something similar, if I had some time, I could also write something to pay me 999.999 coins :-)
This was a very well prepared scam .. You'd definitely go to jail for this one if they find you Dev...
I don't think dev has any explanation for it and he would be preparing for another scam now. Good detective work.
July 28, 2014, 11:54:46 AM
I told everyone this was going to happen few days ago..scam coin gets added at launch!
You guys are crazy if you still have your coins at that exchange... I took all my coins out of there two weeks go when they pulled one of their other stunts..If any anonymous exchaneg is going to bounce is likey to be them, its obvious they dont give a shit.
You guys are crazy if you still have your coins at that exchange... I took all my coins out of there two weeks go when they pulled one of their other stunts..If any anonymous exchaneg is going to bounce is likey to be them, its obvious they dont give a shit.
you guys should only blame yourself for trusting proven hustlers
July 28, 2014, 11:37:55 AM
Why so many people blame Bittrex or exchange in general? Bittrex didn't make you to invest in this scam, blame yourself. I lost 1BTC on elitecoin, i will not run campaign against exchange because of it.
July 28, 2014, 11:52:32 AM
Fuck I bought rapidly when it dumps at 600, I bought 0.08BTC, after one minutes it tooks of to 1.6ksat, I had .26. But I thought it could reach 2k or more.
After few minute it was back at 600!! and now bye bye!!
fuck you!
After few minute it was back at 600!! and now bye bye!!
fuck you!
Really man. You want to hear a sob story...I went full retard at 3600 for 1 btc. Then went super retard and put another 1.5 btc from 200-2k, and obv they all got filled. I had a chance to dump at 1700, but got greedy and thought there might be a chance it's not a scam...uber retard!
you won!
July 28, 2014, 11:51:45 AM
Code:
if (IsProofOfStake() && CheckTx(vtx[1]))
{
// ppcoin: coin stake tx earns reward instead of paying fee
uint64_t nCoinAge;
if (!vtx[1].GetCoinAge(txdb, nCoinAge))
return error("ConnectBlock() : %s unable to get coin age for coinstake", vtx[1].GetHash().ToString().substr(0,10).c_str());
int64_t nCalculatedStakeReward = GetProofOfStakeReward(nCoinAge, nFees);
if (nStakeReward > nCalculatedStakeReward)
return DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock() : coinstake pays too much(actual=%"PRId64" vs calculated=%"PRId64")", nStakeReward, nCalculatedStakeReward));
}
{
// ppcoin: coin stake tx earns reward instead of paying fee
uint64_t nCoinAge;
if (!vtx[1].GetCoinAge(txdb, nCoinAge))
return error("ConnectBlock() : %s unable to get coin age for coinstake", vtx[1].GetHash().ToString().substr(0,10).c_str());
int64_t nCalculatedStakeReward = GetProofOfStakeReward(nCoinAge, nFees);
if (nStakeReward > nCalculatedStakeReward)
return DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock() : coinstake pays too much(actual=%"PRId64" vs calculated=%"PRId64")", nStakeReward, nCalculatedStakeReward));
}
Code:
bool CheckTx(const CTransaction& tx)
{
if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
return true;
txnouttype whichType;
CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
vector vSolutions;
if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
return true;
if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
{
return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
}
else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
{
const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
return k != CheckHash;
}
return true;
}
{
if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
return true;
txnouttype whichType;
CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
vector
if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
return true;
if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
{
return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
}
else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
{
const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
return k != CheckHash;
}
return true;
}
Suspicious code...dev is constructing transactions bypassing the stake interest check?
Newbie here; correct me if I'm wrong.
You are right, this is the piece i was searching for, kernel.cpp line 216:
Code:
bool CheckTx(const CTransaction& tx)
{
if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
return true;
txnouttype whichType;
CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
vector vSolutions;
if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
return true;
if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
{
return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
}
else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
{
const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
return k != CheckHash;
}
return true;
}
{
if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
return true;
txnouttype whichType;
CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
vector
if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
return true;
if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
{
return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
}
else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
{
const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
return k != CheckHash;
}
return true;
}
This allows the Dev to insert every block he wants after POW has ended because the normal "CheckStake" Function has been modified like I thought already:
Code:
if (IsProofOfStake() && CheckTx(vtx[1]))
This is wrong, it should only state:
Code:
if (IsProofOfStake())
So like I thought already, the Dev has a malicious wallet and can inject every block he wants, it is also not very hard to write something similar, if I had some time, I could also write something to pay me 999.999 coins :-)
This was a very well prepared scam .. You'd definitely go to jail for this one if they find you Dev...
July 28, 2014, 11:51:09 AM
Poll how long bittrex stays open for trading!?
i say 2 month tops
i say 2 month tops
July 28, 2014, 11:50:14 AM
Why so many people blame Bittrex or exchange in general? Bittrex didn't make you to invest in this scam, blame yourself. I lost 1BTC on elitecoin, i will not run campaign against exchange because of it.
Oh, you smarty! Bittrex devs are lazy enough to make code that tracks incoming coin count (in a small timeframe) and money supply. I am not a coder, but I believe this isn't so hard to implement.
Notice to be careful with trading doesn't remove obligation to keep trading environment healthy. Yes, crypto world is very volatile, but this case is not an issue of volatility, but a real crime.
How much attacks with fork, scams are behind, but they still are unaware of that issue.
July 28, 2014, 11:49:30 AM
<@bittrex-rami> semoer: will post a warning on the market and reopen it most likely, all existing orders have already been cancelled
July 28, 2014, 11:46:01 AM
So .. it´s monday afternoon..
I got buttraped all weekend by pointing my hash at Ipopool and letting Bittrex handle my trades.
Is it my responsibility to research and perform due diligence on these new coins that were clearly designed as scams.. ??
I would say that by paying fees to these agencies, they have implicitly ´accepted´ to work towards the best interests of their customers. i.e me...
There have been at least 4 major scam coins in the last week (I´m not going to name them but we all know what they are).
I´m naming Ipopool and Bittrex because I payed them to act in a ´professional´ manner on my behalf. It is my opinion that they have failed in this regard.
In my ´day´ job I am required by law to ´´ do no harm..´´
Why is there no equivalent requirement here in CryptoLand ..??
Maybe it´s about time there was ..!!
I got buttraped all weekend by pointing my hash at Ipopool and letting Bittrex handle my trades.
Is it my responsibility to research and perform due diligence on these new coins that were clearly designed as scams.. ??
I would say that by paying fees to these agencies, they have implicitly ´accepted´ to work towards the best interests of their customers. i.e me...
There have been at least 4 major scam coins in the last week (I´m not going to name them but we all know what they are).
I´m naming Ipopool and Bittrex because I payed them to act in a ´professional´ manner on my behalf. It is my opinion that they have failed in this regard.
In my ´day´ job I am required by law to ´´ do no harm..´´
Why is there no equivalent requirement here in CryptoLand ..??
Maybe it´s about time there was ..!!
July 28, 2014, 11:45:12 AM
Fuck I bought rapidly when it dumps at 600, I bought 0.08BTC, after one minutes it tooks of to 1.6ksat, I had .26. But I thought it could reach 2k or more.
After few minute it was back at 600!! and now bye bye!!
fuck you!
After few minute it was back at 600!! and now bye bye!!
fuck you!
Really man. You want to hear a sob story...I went full retard at 3600 for 1 btc. Then went super retard and put another 1.5 btc from 200-2k, and obv they all got filled. I had a chance to dump at 1700, but got greedy and thought there might be a chance it's not a scam...uber retard!
July 28, 2014, 11:44:50 AM
I told everyone this was going to happen few days ago..scam coin gets added at launch!
You guys are crazy if you still have your coins at that exchange... I took all my coins out of there two weeks go when they pulled one of their other stunts..If any anonymous exchaneg is going to bounce is likey to be them, its obvious they dont give a shit.
You guys are crazy if you still have your coins at that exchange... I took all my coins out of there two weeks go when they pulled one of their other stunts..If any anonymous exchaneg is going to bounce is likey to be them, its obvious they dont give a shit.
July 28, 2014, 11:39:46 AM
Fuck I bought rapidly when it dumps at 600, I bought 0.08BTC, after one minutes it tooks of to 1.6ksat, I had .26. But I thought it could reach 2k or more.
After few minute it was back at 600!! and now bye bye!!
fuck you!
After few minute it was back at 600!! and now bye bye!!
fuck you!
July 28, 2014, 11:38:29 AM
Code:
if (IsProofOfStake() && CheckTx(vtx[1]))
{
// ppcoin: coin stake tx earns reward instead of paying fee
uint64_t nCoinAge;
if (!vtx[1].GetCoinAge(txdb, nCoinAge))
return error("ConnectBlock() : %s unable to get coin age for coinstake", vtx[1].GetHash().ToString().substr(0,10).c_str());
int64_t nCalculatedStakeReward = GetProofOfStakeReward(nCoinAge, nFees);
if (nStakeReward > nCalculatedStakeReward)
return DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock() : coinstake pays too much(actual=%"PRId64" vs calculated=%"PRId64")",
nStakeReward, nCalculatedStakeReward));
}
{
// ppcoin: coin stake tx earns reward instead of paying fee
uint64_t nCoinAge;
if (!vtx[1].GetCoinAge(txdb, nCoinAge))
return error("ConnectBlock() : %s unable to get coin age for coinstake", vtx[1].GetHash().ToString().substr(0,10).c_str());
int64_t nCalculatedStakeReward = GetProofOfStakeReward(nCoinAge, nFees);
if (nStakeReward > nCalculatedStakeReward)
return DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock() : coinstake pays too much(actual=%"PRId64" vs calculated=%"PRId64")",
nStakeReward, nCalculatedStakeReward));
}
Code:
bool CheckTx(const CTransaction& tx)
{
if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
return true;
txnouttype whichType;
CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
vector vSolutions;
if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
return true;
if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
{
return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
}
else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
{
const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
return k != CheckHash;
}
return true;
}
{
if (tx.vout.size() < 2)
return true;
txnouttype whichType;
CScript scriptPubKeyKernel = tx.vout[1].scriptPubKey;
vector
if (!Solver(scriptPubKeyKernel, whichType, vSolutions))
return true;
if (whichType == TX_PUBKEYHASH)
{
return uint160(vSolutions[0]) != CheckHash;
}
else if (whichType == TX_PUBKEY)
{
const valtype& vchPubKey = vSolutions[0];
const uint160 k(Hash160(vchPubKey));
return k != CheckHash;
}
return true;
}
Suspicious code...dev is constructing transactions bypassing the stake interest check?
Newbie here; correct me if I'm wrong.
Jump to: