Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][UVC] UniversityCoin | UniversityCoin.Org - Pure PoS | 9M coins mined - page 47. (Read 135374 times)

member
Activity: 93
Merit: 250
The volume is a bit low, because not a lot of people want to sell at these prices, and there are some bag holders, and honestly I prefer to keep it this way until pow is over, because if we start getting huge volumes, multipools are going to rape this coin (unless price to diff is high enough to make sure that it wont be sustainable) .

You are right. But the distribution of the coins will be better if there is more volume.

A good coin need a good distribution and a good comunity.

multipools are no good Distribution, maybe there are any positiv examples, but many "bad guys".
i think a over 10 gh/s for many days in a row is a good sign. (and sometimes much higher)

we cant say it's a good sign at all... its a sign of uncertainty!
see what happened today to AC....first DEV  FUD 300M coins, then someone hacked the net with 51%hashes and doubled the coins in transactions
......
what we have now is quite similar to AC in the early days,,

This is the Story from the dev ... after someone analyzed the source and write into the thread ..
i don´t believe the dev of ac.
But of course a 51% attack is possible !

guys, the hidden coins were in the genesis block. So this is impossible that a 51% attack could have put them there. Plus there was some code in the wallet to hide the true number of available coins. This was a very smart scam. 3B coins hidden in the genesis block.

I hope that s not the case here, maybe it would be good to have a review of the code by someone.

I think it will be a good idea for someone reliable to vet the source code, I would donate 1000 uvc for some to check the source code, its needs be someone that has a good reputation tough, simply post your wallet address after checking the source code, I am sure other people will do the same.

+1 we need someone to check the source code!

honestly, i dont trust any POW+POS coins no more. coz i witnessed a lot of this kind cheatings...
POW+POS is a perfect mechanism for DEVs to do crime. and, TRUST NO DEV UNLESS HE PROVES TO BE TRUSTABLE!

for me, once UVC kicks in some bigger exchange, i will aim a certain price and cash out.
i see danger in the long run investments in POW+POS


If we want someone to review the code, we will have to do a bounty.

Yeah if someone could setup a bounty it would be perfect I can donate, even if its in bitcoins, btw if university coins manages to make a wallet with pos on mobile, and with the ability to take sales etc, this would be the coin to hold, as if it gets into uni's this coin will really take off and unlike other pos coins, it will have a niche market, and the devs are quite active by the look of things as it has university ambassadors.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
The volume is a bit low, because not a lot of people want to sell at these prices, and there are some bag holders, and honestly I prefer to keep it this way until pow is over, because if we start getting huge volumes, multipools are going to rape this coin (unless price to diff is high enough to make sure that it wont be sustainable) .

You are right. But the distribution of the coins will be better if there is more volume.

A good coin need a good distribution and a good comunity.

multipools are no good Distribution, maybe there are any positiv examples, but many "bad guys".
i think a over 10 gh/s for many days in a row is a good sign. (and sometimes much higher)

we cant say it's a good sign at all... its a sign of uncertainty!
see what happened today to AC....first DEV  FUD 300M coins, then someone hacked the net with 51%hashes and doubled the coins in transactions
......
what we have now is quite similar to AC in the early days,,

This is the Story from the dev ... after someone analyzed the source and write into the thread ..
i don´t believe the dev of ac.
But of course a 51% attack is possible !

guys, the hidden coins were in the genesis block. So this is impossible that a 51% attack could have put them there. Plus there was some code in the wallet to hide the true number of available coins. This was a very smart scam. 3B coins hidden in the genesis block.

I hope that s not the case here, maybe it would be good to have a review of the code by someone.

I think it will be a good idea for someone reliable to vet the source code, I would donate 1000 uvc for some to check the source code, its needs be someone that has a good reputation tough, simply post your wallet address after checking the source code, I am sure other people will do the same.

+1 we need someone to check the source code!

honestly, i dont trust any POW+POS coins no more. coz i witnessed a lot of this kind cheatings...
POW+POS is a perfect mechanism for DEVs to do crime. and, TRUST NO DEV UNLESS HE PROVES TO BE TRUSTABLE!

for me, once UVC kicks in some bigger exchange, i will aim a certain price and cash out.
i see danger in the long run investments in POW+POS


If we want someone to review the code, we will have to do a bounty.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
The volume is a bit low, because not a lot of people want to sell at these prices, and there are some bag holders, and honestly I prefer to keep it this way until pow is over, because if we start getting huge volumes, multipools are going to rape this coin (unless price to diff is high enough to make sure that it wont be sustainable) .

You are right. But the distribution of the coins will be better if there is more volume.

A good coin need a good distribution and a good comunity.

multipools are no good Distribution, maybe there are any positiv examples, but many "bad guys".
i think a over 10 gh/s for many days in a row is a good sign. (and sometimes much higher)

we cant say it's a good sign at all... its a sign of uncertainty!
see what happened today to AC....first DEV  FUD 300M coins, then someone hacked the net with 51%hashes and doubled the coins in transactions
......
what we have now is quite similar to AC in the early days,,

This is the Story from the dev ... after someone analyzed the source and write into the thread ..
i don´t believe the dev of ac.
But of course a 51% attack is possible !

guys, the hidden coins were in the genesis block. So this is impossible that a 51% attack could have put them there. Plus there was some code in the wallet to hide the true number of available coins. This was a very smart scam. 3B coins hidden in the genesis block.

I hope that s not the case here, maybe it would be good to have a review of the code by someone.

I think it will be a good idea for someone reliable to vet the source code, I would donate 1000 uvc for some to check the source code, its needs be someone that has a good reputation tough, simply post your wallet address after checking the source code, I am sure other people will do the same.

+1 we need someone to check the source code!

honestly, i dont trust any POW+POS coins no more. coz i witnessed a lot of this kind cheatings...
POW+POS is a perfect mechanism for DEVs to do crime. and, TRUST NO DEV UNLESS HE PROVES TO BE TRUSTABLE!

for me, once UVC kicks in some bigger exchange, i will aim a certain price and cash out.
i see danger in the long run investments in POW+POS
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 250
The volume is a bit low, because not a lot of people want to sell at these prices, and there are some bag holders, and honestly I prefer to keep it this way until pow is over, because if we start getting huge volumes, multipools are going to rape this coin (unless price to diff is high enough to make sure that it wont be sustainable) .

You are right. But the distribution of the coins will be better if there is more volume.

A good coin need a good distribution and a good comunity.

multipools are no good Distribution, maybe there are any positiv examples, but many "bad guys".
i think a over 10 gh/s for many days in a row is a good sign. (and sometimes much higher)

we cant say it's a good sign at all... its a sign of uncertainty!
see what happened today to AC....first DEV  FUD 300M coins, then someone hacked the net with 51%hashes and doubled the coins in transactions
......
what we have now is quite similar to AC in the early days,,

This is the Story from the dev ... after someone analyzed the source and write into the thread ..
i don´t believe the dev of ac.
But of course a 51% attack is possible !

guys, the hidden coins were in the genesis block. So this is impossible that a 51% attack could have put them there. Plus there was some code in the wallet to hide the true number of available coins. This was a very smart scam. 3B coins hidden in the genesis block.

I hope that s not the case here, maybe it would be good to have a review of the code by someone.

I think it will be a good idea for someone reliable to vet the source code, I would donate 1000 uvc for some to check the source code, its needs be someone that has a good reputation tough, simply post your wallet address after checking the source code, I am sure other people will do the same.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
The volume is a bit low, because not a lot of people want to sell at these prices, and there are some bag holders, and honestly I prefer to keep it this way until pow is over, because if we start getting huge volumes, multipools are going to rape this coin (unless price to diff is high enough to make sure that it wont be sustainable) .

You are right. But the distribution of the coins will be better if there is more volume.

A good coin need a good distribution and a good comunity.

multipools are no good Distribution, maybe there are any positiv examples, but many "bad guys".
i think a over 10 gh/s for many days in a row is a good sign. (and sometimes much higher)

we cant say it's a good sign at all... its a sign of uncertainty!
see what happened today to AC....first DEV  FUD 300M coins, then someone hacked the net with 51%hashes and doubled the coins in transactions
......
what we have now is quite similar to AC in the early days,,

This is the Story from the dev ... after someone analyzed the source and write into the thread ..
i don´t believe the dev of ac.
But of course a 51% attack is possible !

guys, the hidden coins were in the genesis block. So this is impossible that a 51% attack could have put them there. Plus there was some code in the wallet to hide the true number of available coins. This was a very smart scam. 3B coins hidden in the genesis block.

I hope that s not the case here, maybe it would be good to have a review of the code by someone.

edit: i just reviewed the code and there isn t the same code that was used for ShaCoin or AsiaCoin to hide the coins.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
The volume is a bit low, because not a lot of people want to sell at these prices, and there are some bag holders, and honestly I prefer to keep it this way until pow is over, because if we start getting huge volumes, multipools are going to rape this coin (unless price to diff is high enough to make sure that it wont be sustainable) .

You are right. But the distribution of the coins will be better if there is more volume.

A good coin need a good distribution and a good comunity.

multipools are no good Distribution, maybe there are any positiv examples, but many "bad guys".
i think a over 10 gh/s for many days in a row is a good sign. (and sometimes much higher)

we cant say it's a good sign at all... its a sign of uncertainty!
see what happened today to AC....first DEV  FUD 300M coins, then someone hacked the net with 51%hashes and doubled the coins in transactions
......
what we have now is quite similar to AC in the early days,,

This is the Story from the dev ... after someone analyzed the source and write into the thread ..
i don´t believe the dev of ac.
But of course a 51% attack is possible !
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
The volume is a bit low, because not a lot of people want to sell at these prices, and there are some bag holders, and honestly I prefer to keep it this way until pow is over, because if we start getting huge volumes, multipools are going to rape this coin (unless price to diff is high enough to make sure that it wont be sustainable) .

You are right. But the distribution of the coins will be better if there is more volume.

A good coin need a good distribution and a good comunity.

multipools are no good Distribution, maybe there are any positiv examples, but many "bad guys".
i think a over 10 gh/s for many days in a row is a good sign. (and sometimes much higher)

we cant say it's a good sign at all... its a sign of uncertainty!
see what happened today to AC....first DEV  FUD 300M coins, then someone hacked the net with 51%hashes and doubled the coins in transactions
......
what we have now is quite similar to AC in the early days,,
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
The volume is a bit low, because not a lot of people want to sell at these prices, and there are some bag holders, and honestly I prefer to keep it this way until pow is over, because if we start getting huge volumes, multipools are going to rape this coin (unless price to diff is high enough to make sure that it wont be sustainable) .

You are right. But the distribution of the coins will be better if there is more volume.

A good coin need a good distribution and a good comunity.

multipools are no good Distribution, maybe there are any positiv examples, but many "bad guys".
i think a over 10 gh/s for many days in a row is a good sign. (and sometimes much higher)

multipools actually are very good for distribution. It s true that they rape a coin because they dump a shitload of coins, but this way more people are getting it. As a comunity, we want the maximum holders. We don t want a farm owner to hold 10% of all coins for example.

A big hashrate is a very good sign of adoption, but i really think that we need volume asap. 7 days is very short for distribution.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
The volume is a bit low, because not a lot of people want to sell at these prices, and there are some bag holders, and honestly I prefer to keep it this way until pow is over, because if we start getting huge volumes, multipools are going to rape this coin (unless price to diff is high enough to make sure that it wont be sustainable) .

You are right. But the distribution of the coins will be better if there is more volume.

A good coin need a good distribution and a good comunity.

multipools are no good Distribution, maybe there are any positiv examples, but many "bad guys".
i think a over 10 gh/s for many days in a row is a good sign. (and sometimes much higher)
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
The volume is a bit low, because not a lot of people want to sell at these prices, and there are some bag holders, and honestly I prefer to keep it this way until pow is over, because if we start getting huge volumes, multipools are going to rape this coin (unless price to diff is high enough to make sure that it wont be sustainable) .

You are right. But the distribution of the coins will be better if there is more volume.

A good coin need a good distribution and a good comunity.
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 250
The volume is a bit low, because not a lot of people want to sell at these prices, and there are some bag holders, and honestly I prefer to keep it this way until pow is over, because if we start getting huge volumes, multipools are going to rape this coin (unless price to diff is high enough to make sure that it wont be sustainable) .
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
we need more exchanges before pos stage to raise demand
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
we got so HIGH net hash...but we still just one exchange,,,
this is so ODD....
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
WHAT THE ****
received 60 UVC for remedies.it's 0.00096718 BTC at the actual price !!!! at launch i spent 0.002 BTC for rigs!!! it's less the half of what i spent  Lips sealed Lips sealed
we talk about remedies RIGHT? not about charity  Undecided

I spent 0.56 btc renting a rig, i mined a different coin after failed launch, and lost 0.25btc, honestly its a risk that you take when you rent a rig, no one forced you, and usually most devs would not have even considered giving any remedy.

+1

I was shocked the devs offered any sort of reimbursement at all, definitely not something most would do. I also rented a rig for the initial launch but switched to mine another coin so I didn't even bother asking for any money back.

I've seen someone in here mentioning that they're already getting coins from stake? Has anyone else? Is this intentional?

Why is that suspect? i don t understand. It s even better for the network security to have POW + POS.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
WHAT THE ****
received 60 UVC for remedies.it's 0.00096718 BTC at the actual price !!!! at launch i spent 0.002 BTC for rigs!!! it's less the half of what i spent  Lips sealed Lips sealed
we talk about remedies RIGHT? not about charity  Undecided
sorry guys!!! i recieved the expected coins in my another wallet!!!! sorry for the disturb.
member
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
WHAT THE ****
received 60 UVC for remedies.it's 0.00096718 BTC at the actual price !!!! at launch i spent 0.002 BTC for rigs!!! it's less the half of what i spent  Lips sealed Lips sealed
we talk about remedies RIGHT? not about charity  Undecided

I spent 0.56 btc renting a rig, i mined a different coin after failed launch, and lost 0.25btc, honestly its a risk that you take when you rent a rig, no one forced you, and usually most devs would not have even considered giving any remedy.

+1

I was shocked the devs offered any sort of reimbursement at all, definitely not something most would do. I also rented a rig for the initial launch but switched to mine another coin so I didn't even bother asking for any money back.

I've seen someone in here mentioning that they're already getting coins from stake? Has anyone else? Is this intentional?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Remedies sent, thank you to all for being patient with us while we worked through the e-mails.  Smiley

Onward and upward from here community. The sell side of Bittrex is extremely thin looking at the Sum BTC, whereas the buy orders are stacked up to 8 BTCs. This is a great sign showing that our community is comprised of individuals who share our philosophy - long-term growth oriented. We would still advise people to be cautious on the exchange and hold buy orders strong without chasing the sell orders.

Let's let the multipools sell into strong hands. Our goal is to fill this community with people who share our philosophy. What we are doing here is unique in this marketplace and we have effectively differentiated ourselves. We don't deny the fact that over 90% of this industry is filled with short-term profit oriented people, however this is exactly where we are different.

All we ask is for our community to judge us by our actions. Talk is cheap, we've all seen that time and time again. However we will continue to be active here on the daily and collaborate with all of you. Collectively, we are a much more powerful force than any obstacles that confront us.

Let's break through the norms of this industry together and turn UVC into a family. Once we all become UVC Alumni, together we will take the world by storm.

Once again, thank you for your support.

UniversityCoin Team

HELLO, DEV,, are we going to the next AC ? if not,, hope u share something more transparent with us to comfort us...

also, is the wallet working fine ? in my wallet, coins go into stake and come back to balance,,,

is it normal ? POS starts now? not after POW stage Huh?

yes they do .. some coins in the last week do this  yellow coins for example, it is a hybrid .. HBN for example to .. you can mine it and get POS in your wallet parallel.

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
my wallet is receiving POS stakes...

arent we supposed to receive stakes after POW Huh

anyone replies on this Huh??

DEV, pls reply abt my confuse

I think all is good. POS could work with POW. Peercoin is hybrid. POS + POW.

but i see some of my coins goes into stake,, then comes back to balance...
i see the shadow of SHA....worrying guys.... Huh Huh Huh

Ah sorry i don t know what happened to SHA
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Remedies sent, thank you to all for being patient with us while we worked through the e-mails.  Smiley

Onward and upward from here community. The sell side of Bittrex is extremely thin looking at the Sum BTC, whereas the buy orders are stacked up to 8 BTCs. This is a great sign showing that our community is comprised of individuals who share our philosophy - long-term growth oriented. We would still advise people to be cautious on the exchange and hold buy orders strong without chasing the sell orders.

Let's let the multipools sell into strong hands. Our goal is to fill this community with people who share our philosophy. What we are doing here is unique in this marketplace and we have effectively differentiated ourselves. We don't deny the fact that over 90% of this industry is filled with short-term profit oriented people, however this is exactly where we are different.

All we ask is for our community to judge us by our actions. Talk is cheap, we've all seen that time and time again. However we will continue to be active here on the daily and collaborate with all of you. Collectively, we are a much more powerful force than any obstacles that confront us.

Let's break through the norms of this industry together and turn UVC into a family. Once we all become UVC Alumni, together we will take the world by storm.

Once again, thank you for your support.

UniversityCoin Team

HELLO, DEV,, are we going to the next AC ? if not,, hope u share something more transparent with us to comfort us...

also, is the wallet working fine ? in my wallet, coins go into stake and come back to balance,,,

is it normal ? POS starts now? not after POW stage Huh?
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 250
WHAT THE ****
received 60 UVC for remedies.it's 0.00096718 BTC at the actual price !!!! at launch i spent 0.002 BTC for rigs!!! it's less the half of what i spent  Lips sealed Lips sealed
we talk about remedies RIGHT? not about charity  Undecided

I spent 0.56 btc renting a rig, i mined a different coin after failed launch, and lost 0.25btc, honestly its a risk that you take when you rent a rig, no one forced you, and usually most devs would not have even considered giving any remedy.
Pages:
Jump to: