Technically speaking this is not true. I had a chat about it with some BTC developers on the other day. I heard again what they always say, actually they would be happy to see sensible blockchain 2 features e.g smart contracts on the BTC blockchain. All they did, as you know reduced the OP_RETURN output to 40 bytes to make the whole thing a bit sensible and avoid to implement dropbox type of apps on the blockchain. As I can see you do have OP_RETURN output on your source so nothing stopping you to implement blockchain 2 features. You are just not interested in that, you are working on same lame user name feature (which has nothing to dowith blockchain 2) and you are working on your mass worldwide adoption theme.
David is working on some 2.0 features, but we think having the world using VeriCoin will be much more valuable than a few people using smart contracts now. We're also still working with a decentralized exchange/smart contracts system.
40 bytes is not very large... we could tweak it with a mandatory update, but blockchain bloat is a serious issue. By the way, blockchain 2.0 does include usernames.
Sorry you don't like the whole mass adoption theme. That was something we stated as a theme (and we aren't going to quit our goals there) from the get-go. And that's also why our first features were VeriSMS and VeriBit. Because they make things easier for others.
We don't want VeriCoin to be an "altcoin" but rather VeriCoin-- a coin people don't relate to altcoins because it's bigger than that.
[/quote]
I understand what you guys want to achieve and make Vericoin something that is a payment system.
But we should at discuss which way VRC will take.
It smart to say we don't want to be another coin beside BTC and LTC just be VRC.
important: Utility, ease-of-use, and mass adoption.
But I don't see VRC becoming accepted by the public/Merchants as a payment. VRC will bite their teethes out if they want to compete with BTC / LTC / Dodgecoin even DRK. They all want to become ease to use and mass adopted. In the end Innovation doesn't make it currently more attractive for merchants because the standard coins are already much more wide spread ,known and just work fine for as a currency.
We have to think about other ways to become widespread by supporting BTC as a payment and provide services that are unique and not possible with bitcoin.
-I see that VeriSMS took a lot of time to work, but it's hard to use (Nobody wants to write a Wallet address in an SMS) on top Bitcoin has this implementation already: Coinbase Blockchain.info or even 37Coins.
- New wallet UI is nice and helps a lot to get new users the use them. But in the end there is still no lite Wallet is needed.
- Smart Contracts are also great, but Ethereum will be the prime predator when it comes to this. They are not just creating a blockchain 2 but also active regarding legal issues and so on.
In my eyes Vericoin has currently PoS + VerBit as a special.
a decentralized exchange based on the Blockchain combined with Veribank could become a golden Egg.